Westboro Hate Cult Protest Memorial of Murdered Teen

Posted on February 23, 2008

Once again seeking attention, the retards of the Westboro Hate Cult try to outdo themselves in making people sick. They’ve made their reputation protesting the funerals of soldiers, and its hard to outdo their sickening attempt to protest the funeral of three murdered Amish children, but they try.

Reno Teenager and Santa Barbara College student Brianna Denison was abducted in January while staying with friends over Christmas break. The home was near the University of Nevada and close to two other recent rapes. Her body was later found this month 8 miles from where she disappeared.

The police have been working feverishly to find this killer. They have linked his DNA to the 2 other rapes and believe a 3rd rape case in the area may also be linked.

And now the hate freaks chime in:

Reno-Sparks Convention Center
4590 S. Virginia St.
This is for the memorial service for Brianna Denison. She was the “victim” of a serial rapist’s[sic] strangulation. We call it the Wrath of God being poured out on a nation of rebels without a cause. You brought this Wrath on your own head, Reno, NV because you (lst) raised your children to be dashed to pieces as rebellious, arragant[sic] soldiers of a Doomed nation of perverts and (2nd) when we warned you to not go to Hell like the dead soldiers and OBEY YOUR MAKER[......]

I’m sure there will be plenty there to counter-protest. If you are in the area, get involved in blocking these creeps out.

» Filed Under 1st Amendment, ACLU, Fallen Heros, News, Stupidity


Trackback URL

Comments

13 Responses to “Westboro Hate Cult Protest Memorial of Murdered Teen”

  1. Two Dogs on February 23rd, 2008 4:00 pm

    You simply have to love the Religious Left fanatics. What happened to that legislation that was making it through the house that would make these protests by Westboro illegal? Did the Dems find that their religious groups would be silenced by the bill?

  2. golden phoenix on February 23rd, 2008 6:01 pm

    Dont those ghouls have any respect for the dead? what would happen if one of them died?

  3. Two Dogs on February 23rd, 2008 6:49 pm

    golden phoenix, the left has been telling us for over forty years what they stand for, why do you not believe them by now? The sooner that we on the right stand up for what is proper and righteous, the sooner that we can return to proper behavior and replace the stigma of stupidity on stupid things. It is mainly our fault because we have not engaged their silliness. We are the intelligent adults.

    Why do we continue to feign shock at the behavior of the Left, I mean they march in support of the legality of killing children, is there anything more immoral and disgusting than that?

  4. Mark on February 23rd, 2008 10:27 pm

    Ha ha ha ha, So I live in Reno, NV and tonight the COWARDS from Westboro Hate Cult showed up to the memorial for Bri (all 3 of them) and they left about 20 minutes later…ha ha ha in a Police cruiser at that…ha ha ha They held up signs that made me sick to my stomach! I cannot beleive how sick these inbreds are!

  5. Jenny on February 24th, 2008 2:26 am

    Hypocrites!! How can you claim to do the work of God and at the same time say that ANYONE deserves to die the way Brianna did!!?? Those sick (insert obscenity here) are the ones that have to face Him in the end and they shame Him! I don’t know what kind of God would ever wish this kind of death on ANYONE, and if that is your God, I’d rather go to Hell. I’ll see you there! We’re all hypocrites in one way or another, but at least I know that I’m not perfect and don’t pretend to be better than anyone. Shame on you, you make me sick!! Tell me, why do you think you are the MINORITY in this?!? Get a clue!

  6. John Torch on February 24th, 2008 6:14 pm

    The WBC just got done attempting to protest not to far from me at NIU. Freedom of speech is one thing, but what they are doing is hiding behind a religious book in order to spread their hate.

    They love the anger people have towards them. They really do. The only way to actually cripple them is to turn their World upside down.

    My site http://Anarchology.org has a section devoted to dealing with that group.

  7. Hyperbole on February 25th, 2008 1:43 am

    I was at this “protest” yesterday, myself. When it was over, it all seemed like a lot of commotion over very little. It was basically two old, fat women holding small signs that said “THANK GOD FOR DEAD CHILDREN”. They stood on the corner for 20 minutes and maybe all of 40 cars passed by the whole time - traffic in the area was totally backed up. Then a police cruiser picked them up.

    If it weren’t for the maybe 500 counter-protesters… I’m not sure anyone would have even noticed them.

  8. Eric H on February 25th, 2008 10:28 am

    First of all I have to ask Two Dogs what Religious Left Fanatic is, just seems like a contradiction of terms.
    Then I must remind you all that the ACLU denounced this group of protesters and did not defend their right to protest. While I’m at it I’ll remind you that the ACLU helped to void the conviction of Right Wing hero Ollie North when he was convicted in the Iran-Contra affair.
    When someone from the government comes to shut down your site guess who will be there defending your right to spread this bull@#$% propaganda? The ACLU !

  9. Two Dogs on February 25th, 2008 10:58 am

    First thing, Eric, the “conservative” and “liberal” definitions got switched somewhere down the line and I do not know exactly when that happened, so remember that when we talk about conservatives these days, we are actually talking about the true liberal mentality, granted, it is somewhat muted anf filtered now. Liberal, by definition, means that you do not believe in any government control of your life or the life of others. That certainly doesn’t define today’s left. Second thing, a contradiction cannot exist. If you find what appears to be a contradiction, you have a problem with your logic somewhere in your basic premises. Find that problem to correct your mistakes or misunderstandings.

    The new left very much possesses religious people. Granted, their opinions are far afield from traditional religious beliefs or biblical history and teachings. Point in case, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, headed by Barry Lynn. Also, in case you have not heard, there exists a religion called “Islam.” They too adhere to the basic premises championed by today’s Left, if you disagree with someone, do not try to debate on actual facts, simply destroy them by any means possible. Including bombs attached to mentally handicapped folks.

    Also, Phelps of the Westboro Baptist Church has always been an active Democrat. The Democrats that have always been conservative, racist and dictatorial, but today are called liberal or worse still, progressive. Do any search on his political activism and you will find that he has always been a Democrat. And his son attended Bill Clinton’s first inauguration in Fred’s stead.

  10. Eric H on February 25th, 2008 11:31 am

    Here’s the thing TD I consider myself to be left of center as far as gay marriage, freedom of choice, religious freedom and so on and am a registered Dem.
    but I only have a party affiliation so I can caucus. My state (Maine) does not allow independents to participate you must be a party member.
    When I look at some of the threads on this site this organization seems to have a pro-christian, repressive attitude. How do advocate gov control over a woman’s right to choose by making abortion illegal while saying you’re for less gov control. How do attack the ACLU when they have fought the US gov. in many battles? How do defend the Boy Scouts right to exclude anyone? By the way the BSA has had many documented cases of molestation by straight men and does nothing about it.
    Despite you deep thoughts on the word contradiction I assure you they do exist, so in the future let’s both drop the condescending tone and maybe have a real discussion.

  11. Two Dogs on February 25th, 2008 11:49 am

    Regressive by definition means to turn back to the ways of the past, Eric. Christians by definition look forward to infinity where they have to answer for their actions. There is no such thing as “regressive” Christian behavior. There exists a book called a “dictionary” that will explain to you the meaning of words. My suggestion would be that you purchase one straight away because you have no idea what you are talking about.

    As far as contradictions are concerned, I simply stated fact, Eric. I am sorry that I hurt your feelings. It is not deep thought, to point out truth, it is thought, period. Contradictions cannot exist. Point in case, your ridiculous “choice” argument. Two opposing ideas cannot exist together. One is right and one is wrong. If you believe that it is solely a woman’s right to choose to kill a child or not, then you cannot force the father to offer any part to that child’s life, such as support for any child, it is the mother’s responsibility entirely, it is her “fault” that she wound up pregnant. Do you acknowledge that your premises are flawed or will you simply ignore that truth? It is not a contradiction, it is admitting that you hold two totally conflicting opinions, which means that you developed the idea void of any rational thought. Feel your way through life, son.

    Yes, there have been homosexual (exclusively) molesters in the Boy Scouts, just as there have been in the priesthood, however these abnormalities are far and away the exceptions that prove the rules. These are people that possess no values or morals, much like you have explained and exhibited.

  12. Eric H on February 25th, 2008 4:52 pm

    I see we’re not going to drop the the condescending tone from this back and forth, so be it.

    The word I used was REPRESSIVE not REGRESSIVE
    May I suggest you purchase some reading glasses.
    Since you bring it up I do think that fundamentalist christian thinking and action is taking us, as a society, backward and so I guess both words would apply.

    contradiction |?käntr??dik sh ?n|
    noun
    a combination of statements, ideas, or features of a situation that are opposed to one another.
    There it is, cut and pasted right out of the dictionary. I didn’t even have to purchase it, it came with my Mac.

    Now, you know as well as I do that “a woman’s right to choose” is a turn of phrase and does not exclude the father from involvement with the child or the decision to have an abortion. You must also know that abortions took place before it was legal and would continue if it were illegal. You must also know that illegal abortions are unsafe and dangerous. Not only that, not everyone believes it is a sin and it is not up those who think it is to decide for others. Judge not lest… Let he is without sin… it was Jesus’ way of telling people to mind their own business.
    Please don’t call me “son” and I won’t insult you, OK?

    Next, are saying that everyone guilty of molestation in the BSA and Catholic church was gay? Many of the offenders in the BSA were married with kids, not that excludes you from being gay but it does cut odds drastically. Anyway my point was, who are is the BSA to judge anyone when they have covered up and protected abusers form prosecution to save their public image?

    Digest this and get back to with you next batch of faux intellectual “ideas” they mildly amuse me.
    If you just want to argue semantics don’t bother.

  13. Two Dogs on February 25th, 2008 5:52 pm

    Sorry Eric, I cannot find any other way to type other than simple declarative sentences on a keyboard, so if your self-esteem makes you interpret my typing as condescending, I can do nothing about that. It is simply text on a page, there is no emotion involved.

    And I did read “repressive” wrong, but of course you agreed with my reading of it as well, so everyone is happy.

    By definition, “abortion” is always unsafe. abortion: deliberate termination of a pregnancy. termination: an end. Pregnant: having a child or other offspring developing in the body. Conclusion: “An end of a child.”

    I am glad that you now know that a contradiction cannot exist, and I am glad we are finally treading on common ground, see there is progress right there in our communication.

    Your referring to a “woman’s right to choose” does not refer to a man, so I shall assume that you just forgot to type “and man’s” in your statement. Therefore, I agree, it is a woman and a man’s right to choose to end their child. And then they should go to jail, because the ending of a life is exactly that and it is against the law. (See Maine’s statutes to find possible penalties for this crime.)

    Also, the people that do not believe that abortion is a sin are by definition NOT following biblical teaching because of that little “Thou shalt not kill.” rule. (See paragraphs 2 & 4 of this comment for clarity. Also see Exodus 20:13 for source.)

    I am sorry that referring to you as “son” is offensive. I admit that I am not your father, but that is a reference from an older man to a younger man. It is actually a term of endearment and caring. My assumption of you being much younger than me stems from your lack of understanding of very basic words, I do not mean the comment in a derogatory manner at all.

    As far as the molestation is concerned, I used the word “homosexual.” “Gay” means “having or showing a merry, lively mood.” When a male of our (or any) species gets with another male of our (or any) species, that by definition is a homosexual act. “Homosexual” means that two or more members of the same sex are sexually active with each other.

    I am glad that definitions amuse you. You have come a long way today in making the accumulation of knowledge fun for yourself, sir. (Better?)

    If there are any more words of which you require the definition, please contact me at my e-mail or my blog.