Muslim Denial Getting Worse
Posted on July 9, 2007
I mentioned on July 5 that new British Prime Minister Gordon Brown has forbidden reference to Muslims in connection with the recent terror attacks in England and Scotland.
It seems that the worse the Muslim attacks get, the more the Muslim involvement has to get covered up. The New York Times has also come to the party. It claims that the various Muslim attacks in Britian have brought “home to Britain fears of homegrown terrorist attacks among its disenfranchised South Asian population”
Since most South Asians in Britain are Hindus, that is straight-out deception. And how are any of them “disenfranchised”? Nobody is denied the vote in Britain on account of their religion or race. So desperate are they that we are now getting straight lies from the mainstream media. “The people must not be told the truth” might almost be the Leftist motto. It is certainly what they practice whenever they can.
Princeton economist Alan Krueger is one representative of the coverup among academics. He admits that the old fallback — poverty — does not cause terrorism and says that it is “suppression of civil liberties and political rights” that causes terrorism. Yet nowhere in the world do Muslims have such great civil liberties and political rights as they do in Britain. So that is why there have been so many Muslim attacks in Britain, you see! Anything at all will be grasped at rather than admit that Islam is the problem.
(For more postings from me, see TONGUE-TIED, EDUCATION WATCH INTERNATIONAL, GREENIE WATCH, POLITICAL CORRECTNESS WATCH, FOOD & HEALTH SKEPTIC, GUN WATCH, SOCIALIZED MEDICINE, AUSTRALIAN POLITICS, DISSECTING LEFTISM, IMMIGRATION WATCH INTERNATIONAL and EYE ON BRITAIN. My Home Pages are here or here or here. Email me (John Ray) here.)
» Filed Under ACLU
Trackback URL
Comments
9 Responses to “Muslim Denial Getting Worse”





























You are misguided and uninformed.
To ewe:
Why is he misguided and uninformed? Before making potshot remarks like that, hadn’t you better support it with some, oh..I dunno…data? Facts?
Actually, the dominant immigrant in Britain from “south Asia” are Pakistanis,
and have been for some time.
Hey Gary I. Day what difference is it where the Muslims come from
Pakistanis are mostly muslims, the same as from any other country
in that region. They are all barbarian murders.
My Friends:
When are we going to understand that Muslim are in search of libert, democracy or justice. The want to expand Islam by violent means. The West is the only remaining block of the world that it can afford to fight and stop this people. But we are constentley been percived as week because we have politicized the war on terror. Everbody wants to score political point, and this has given an advantage for the extremest to come to Europe and America pretend to assimilate enter our prestigase
schools and work place, study our security and at the end stike a blow.
We need to stop immigration from the Arab and Mulsim world period. Would that mean discriminating? Yes sometimes discrimination is in the interest of the nation.
Dethanial,
I was correcting a point in the original post, stating that most of
Britain’s south Asians were Hindu. If you didn’t know, Muslims and
Hindus are two vastly different religions. I was countering the point
that the Times was being deliberately deceitful.
SORRY, I GUESS I DID NOT READ ALL.
In the interest of being too politically correct, these terrorist groups flourish behind our fear of offending others. God forbid that we have to apologize for making a mistake. And that our apology will be accepted? We live in a time where common sense has gone right out the window and we now think before we speak for fear of inadvertenly saying the wrong thing. We all need to be offended on a semi-regular basis. This is what keeps us balanced and separates the worthy issues from the trivial. We have lost the ability to look at ourselves and say “I could have done that better”.
If you simply say Muslim, that’d be a “straight-out deception” as well. The most populous Muslim nation is Indonesia. You wouldn’t want to imply that the current terrorists are from Indonesia would you? (perhaps south asian muslims would be the most precise).
and your idea that islam is the reason for the violence, you’d be doing michael moore style social science. prior to the wonderfully successful war on terror, the largest number of terrorist attacks were committed by the tamil tigers in sri lanka.