Brits singing Iraq swan song
Posted on February 20, 2007
All the more reason for us to redouble our efforts and get serious about winning…something we should have done 40 months ago of course, but nonetheless…
AP: Blair to announce plan for U.K. pullout from Iraq
LONDON // Prime Minister Tony Blair will announce on Wednesday a new timetable for the withdrawal of British troops from Iraq, with 1,500 to return home in several weeks, the BBC reported.
Blair will also tell the House of Commons during his regular weekly appearance before it that a total of about 3,000 British soldiers will have left southern Iraq by the end of 2007, if the security there is sufficient, the British Broadcasting Corp. said tonight, quoting government officials who weren’t further identified.
The BBC said Blair was not expected to say when the rest of Britain’s forces would leave Iraq. Currently, Britain has about 7,100 soldiers there.
Britain has long been the most important coalition member in Iraq after the United States. But Blair knows the British public and politicians from his own Labour Party want the troops out as quickly as possible, and don’t want to see Britain stick with the United States in Iraq for the long haul.
Militarily, a British withdrawal isn’t likely to have much effect on the stepped-up U.S. operation in Baghdad or the war with the Sunnis in Anbar province west of the Iraqi capital. However, Iraqi forces could have a tough time maintaining security in mostly Shiite southern Iraq, including Basra city.
Blair’s Downing Street office refused to comment on the BBC report, which also said Blair would tell the Commons that if the situation worsens on the ground on Iraq, his new game plan could change.
The announcement comes even as President Bush implements an increase of 21,000 more U.S. troops for Iraq.
Blair and Bush talked by secure video link this morning, and Bush views Britain’s troop cutbacks as “a sign of success” in Iraq, said U.S. National Security Council spokesman Gordon Johndroe.
Yeah, right. Nice spin…thanks for the memories.
“The president is grateful for the support of the British forces in the past and into the future,” Johndroe said in Washington. “While the United Kingdom is maintaining a robust force in southern Iraq, we’re pleased that conditions in Basra have improved sufficiently that they are able to transition more control to the Iraqis.
“The United States shares the same goal of turning responsibility over to the Iraqi Security Forces and reducing the number of American troops in Iraq,” Johndroe said. “President Bush sees this as a sign of success and what is possible for us once we help the Iraqis deal with the sectarian violence in Baghdad.”
“We want to bring our troops homes as well,” Johndroe said. “It’s the model we want to emulate, to turn over more responsibilities to Iraqis and bring our troops home. That’s the goal and always has been.”
The new Blair game plan comes at a time when other coalition partners are pulling out. The Italians and Slovaks have left, and the Danes and the South Koreans also want to start withdrawing.
Currently, according to the Brookings Institution, besides Britain, the major partners in the coalition include South Korea (2,300 troops), Poland (900), Australia and Georgia (both 800), Romania (600) and Denmark (460).
What? What do you mean “coalition partners?” I thought we were “going it alone!” all this time. I guess we are now. Be that as it may. We MUST win in Iraq, alone or in a crowd. Contrary to B. Hussein Obama’s verbal vomit about “wasted lives,” the troops’ lives are only wasted lives if we follow the Left’s path to defeat and if the invertebrate GOP continues its descent into comfortable minority.
Victory is the only option. Unfortunately, I’m not sure our civilian leadership has the will or the know-how to get this done. Channeling Blackjack Pershing…Chesty Puller…Lincoln…Truman…
» Filed Under Border Control/Homeland Security, News, War On Terror
Trackback URL




























