Jim Webb must have ghost-written “My Life” and Clinton’s Monica talking points…oral sex (with a kid) isn’t sexual

Posted on October 27, 2006

Jay asked me to move this back up top:

Update: Webb responds!…errrrr, pathetically. Hot Air has the audio.

Webb said the release of the excerpts was “a Karl Rove campaign tactic” and a “classic example of the way this campaign has worked. It’s smear after smear.”

He defended his fiction as “illuminative.”

“It’s not a sexual act,” Webb told Plotkin regarding the “Lost Soldiers” excerpt. “I actually saw this happen in a slum in Bangkok when I was there as a journalist.”

“The duty of a writer is to illuminate the surroundings,” he added.

Hmmm…seems he took the advice from Daily Kos on how to respond.
OK, so because you “actually saw” it in a “slum in Bangkok,” it’s not sexual? Aren’t the slums of Bangkok exactly where Euro pederasts are known to spend their holiday evenings for “non-sexual” reasons? Interesting explanation. I’m feeling a little zeitgeisty, so I’ll throw it out there…do we sense a little bit of “racism” — brown people and slum in the same sentence and them dumb foreigners don’t even know that pedofellatio is sexual…oh wait, that’s Jim Webb that doesn’t consider it sexual…whatever. Yes, yes, Jim Webb’s own book is a Rovian plot! You wrote it, own it.

American Princess thinks he dug himself a deeper hole……so does John Hawkins.

The headline on Drudge is of course, “Boy’s Penis in Father’s Mouth ‘Not a Sexual Act,’ Webb Tells Radio Host…”

Game over. Allen wins! Allen Wins! Allen Wins!

Also see Allen HQ Blog for the double standard of democrats on this.

Rick Moran says enough is enough!

» Filed Under Child Exploitation, Illegal Activities, News

Trackback URL

Comments

One Response to “Jim Webb must have ghost-written “My Life” and Clinton’s Monica talking points…oral sex (with a kid) isn’t sexual”

kerwin_brown on October 28th, 2006 8:30 pm

I do not believe he meant it the way that it is being taken. I believe he is saying his writing it down was not a sexual act which is some of the accusations I have heard fly.

The question is whether or not he should have included such graphic writings in his book in the first place. I say no as it can serve as propaganda to normalize such behavior.

I believe he found the act horrible to behold, and put it in his book to emphasize the lack or ethics of the central character of that part of the story. I only read the excerpt, which may have given me the wrong impression.