ACLU: Kill Off The Children - But Make Sure You Let Killers Live
Posted on January 23, 2006
In 1983, Vernon Evens, Jr was convicted for brutally murdering 2 motel clerks in Baltimore County Maryland. The ACLU has decided to intervene. They do this, all the while strongly opposing ANY restrictions on the wide use of murder as population control and a method of contraception. Killing off the innocent for the sake of keeping killers alive. That’s logic for you.
Here are the facts of the case derived from an actual appeals court decision on his case.
Vernon Lee Evans, Jr., was hired by Anthony Grandison to kill Cheryl and David Scott Piechowicz. The Piechowiczes were scheduled to testify as witnesses against Grandison in a federal narcotics case. Grandison agreed to pay Evans $9,000 for carrying out the murders.
The Piechowiczes worked at the Warren House Motel in Baltimore County, Maryland. On April 28, 1983, Susan Kennedy, the sister of Cheryl Piechowicz, was working in Cheryl’s place along with Scott Piechowicz in the motel lobby. On that day, Evans, not knowing the Piechowiczes, entered the motel with the purpose of eliminating the couple on Grandison’s behalf. After a short wait, Evans shot Scott Piechowicz and Susan Kennedy in the motel lobby. Evans fired nineteen bullets at the victims with a MAC-11 machine pistol equipped with a silencer or noise suppressor. The victims died from multiple gunshot wounds.
Evans was arrested and charged with federal and state crimes. In November 1983, he was convicted in federal district court, along with Grandison, Janet Moore, and Rodney Kelly, of witness tampering and interfering with the Piechowiczes’ civil rights to be witnesses in a judicial proceeding. Evans was sentenced to life and ten years in prison, with the sentences to be served consecutively.
In 1984, Evans was tried on state charges in the Circuit Court for Worcester County, Maryland. Specifically, Evans was tried for two counts of first degree murder, conspiracy to commit murder, and the use of a handgun in the commission of a felony or crime of violence.
During the state trial, the prosecution offered overwhelming incriminating evidence against Evans through a number of witnesses. The most damaging testimony came from Charlene Sparrow, who was Evans’ girlfriend at the time of the murders. Sparrow testified that she accompanied Evans and Janet Moore to the Baltimore City Jail two days before the shooting. At the jail, Evans and Moore met with Grandison, who was awaiting his federal drug trial. Sparrow then inspected the reception desk area of the Warren House Motel. She reported to Evans concerning the people working there and the presence or absence of security features. Sparrow also obtained a room at the motel with Evans’ funds at his request. On the day of the murders, Evans told Sparrow to wait for him in the car behind the motel. Just before Evans walked to the motel, Sparrow looked inside the brown canvas bag he was carrying and saw a machine gun. Some ten to fifteen minutes later, Evans returned to the car, gave the smoking MAC- 11 machine pistol to Sparrow, and asked her to wipe it down. Evans had also told her that he would receive $9,000 “if he knocked both of them off.” Evans and Sparrow went to the mall that night to spend part of the proceeds from the murders.
Other witnesses also supplied incriminating testimony as to Evans’ central role in the murders. For example, Moore testified as to her and Evans’ visit to Grandison at the jail two days before the killings. Calvin Harper testified concerning the day of the murder and the two days leading up to it. Harper’s testimony included a description of Evans’ acquisition of the machine pistol used in the crime from Rodney Kelly and Evans’ statement that he liked the gun. Several other witnesses were able to place Evans in the motel lobby during the time immediately preceding the murders. For example, Etta Horne, who worked at the motel, identified Evans as the man she saw sitting in the motel lobby shortly before the murders. Helen Kondilidis, who had entered the motel shortly before the murders, also identified Evans as the man she saw sitting in the lobby.
The jury found Evans guilty of each of the crimes with which he was charged. The jury then sentenced Evans to death on each murder count. Evans was sentenced to life in prison for the conspiracy conviction and twenty years in prison for the handgun offense. These non-capital sentences were to run consecutively to each other, as well as consecutively to Evans’ federal sentences of life and ten years.
See a complete listing of his appeals and their decisions from my source here.
After 23 years of appeals, no court has found sufficient evidence to over-turn his death sentences. Yes sentences, 2 of them.
The ACLU can’t claim that their new poster child is an innocent victim of our vindictive society, so what is their approach now? They are challenging the method by which he will be put to death.
In a suit filed Friday in Baltimore Circuit Court, the ACLU, the Baltimore City Branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and the Maryland Citizens Against State Executions said that procedures by the Maryland Division of Correction “dangerously call for administration of two exceptionally painful paralytic agents and … fail to provide for continuous administration of anesthetics …”
The ACLU also contends that the DOC uses an additional drug in the lethal injection that was not approved by the General Assembly. SOURCE
This man was paid to kill. This man killed in cold blood. There is no doubt that he committed this crime or dispute of the facts of the case, yet the ACLU and the NAACP are fixated on allowing guilty murderers to live while they advocate the ending of innocent human life.
We are entering a dangerous period of time. We are going to be in a position where a pre-natal exam will reveal potential birth defects and those children will be terminated solely because of these test results. Keep in mind that these test results have often been wrong or wrongly interpreted.
These same tests have yielded healthy babies to parents who were willing to have the child with the developmental diseases or defects. So what’s next? Will we be able soon to tell the hair and eye color of unborn children? Will we be given the option of aborting those children who will not be born with the correct hair and eye color? People, we are starting to tread into dangerous waters.
China mandates that a second pregnancy MUST be terminated. The only exceptions are if you put the child up for foreign adoption, or the child dies. This is the reason why so many people adopt Chinese children. And if you notice, they are ALL girls.
Our culture of death is hypocritical. We have laws that say if you commit murder, you get the needle, yet these murderers go out and commit the crime anyway. Then they get to spend 20+ years on death row on the taxpayers’ dime while their appeals (also taxpayer funded) play out. Then they know groups like the ACLU, NAACP, Amnesty International, and other loony leftist groups petition the courts on their behalf claiming that the death penalty is cruel and unusual. But these are the same people who will advocate the death of unborn children under the guise of choice.
Death is death. Question is… was it deserved?
Trackback URL
Comments
7 Responses to “ACLU: Kill Off The Children - But Make Sure You Let Killers Live”





























The ACLU doesn’t believe in erring on the side of caution at all.
great post Grib…I saw an article about it this morning and my first thought was how willing these groups are to strain out a gnat(ie. “execution protocols were never made available for public comment”) and swallow a camel (cold blooded murder for hire).
What else is new? The American Civil Lunatics Union and their evil compatriots in the legal community and elitist do not want to understand that the death penalty is the will of the people.
There are trying to do what the courts and legislators will not; impose their minority view upon the rest of us. The people of Maryland want the death penalty, just like those in other states. The ACLU says no, just because your representatives, in effect the people voted for it, that does not make it right.
Look at the Wesley Cook case. Wesley Cook, ok, Mumia Mumbo Jumbo, has gotten so much heat over the years. He is still alive and well in prison because of the ACLU, celebrities, NGOS, and others. He only killed a police officer! The Supreme Court agreed that everything about his trial and sentence was proper, yet he still prevails with help of people like the ACLU. Danny Faulkner was forgotten. No one cares about him and all of the other victims of murder and other heinous crimes.
The really sad thing is that we, the tax payer are stuck with the bill. We have to feed and take care of these criminals until their numerous apeals are exhausted. In many cases, the legal bills are paid for with tax dollars, and human tesources that can be used for other purposes are diverted to defend the death penalty in each and every case.
Many years ago there was a movement in the Criminal Justice world to modify the crimnal codes. One of the reforms was to limit the time, type, and number of appeals in death penalty cases modelled on the United States Code of Military Justice. It was a more efficient model. It died. The legal community, especially the ACLU fought it. It would have severely crippled them. It had nothing to do with rights and everything to do with letting lawyers do what they want.
I am waiting for the ACLU to state that terrorism is a form of expression protected by the First Amendment. This is waht it will take for America to finally say enough!
Our culture of death is also hypocritical in that when a fetus dies when the mother is murdered… the murderer is charged with double murder. Yet abortion isn’t legally considered murder..
I for got one piece of lunacy. Some years back, theACLU weighed in with other anti death penalty groups. Their dissent was that the drugs being used in the execution were not approved by the FDA for use in executing humans.
As an African-American Baltimorian, I am anxiously awaiting the day when Maryland finds alternative means to “stick it” to both Evans and Grandison. Their victims never had a chance. My tax dollars have fed them both for years. I invite the State Gov’t to use some of my funds to purchase gas (w/ plumbing suitable to administer long overdue justice) or an electric chair. No need to worry over collapsed veins. Maryland fried corspes, courtesy of a newly minted chair, would not present a problem.
I just wanted to point out a few things.
First, as you mention in your rant, murders continue to occur despite the possiblity of a death penalty. This is because the death penalty DOES NOT DETER CRIME!
Second, our processes for the death pentalty is more costly than keeping prisoners segregated from society.
Third, our system has hiccups. I’m sure most logical people will admit that the system is falible. Who is going to stand up for you if you are wrongly convicted and sentenced to death? It’s the ACLU and Amnesty International. These agencies are in place not to stand up for the individual’s but for all of our society.