Judge Gives No Prison Time For Gay Rapist Teacher

Posted on January 18, 2006

Via WND

A former high school teacher who pleaded guilty to the homosexual rape of one of his teenage students will avoid jail time.

Gregory Pathiakis, 26, of Brockton, Mass., pleaded guilty yesterday to one count of rape of a child, enticement of a child under 16, five counts of possession of child pornography and one count of distribution of harmful material to a child, according to the Enterprise newspaper of Brockton, Mass.

Quite a list of evidence against this freak. The child porn was discovered after the investigators seized his computer to examine the emails he sent the teen. The rape took place in his apartment. The teen said the incident forced him to leave school and activities he loved and be homeschooled. The boy’s mother told the court, “You have destroyed our child and our family.” The man was arrested after the boy told authorities about the rape.

What would be justice for all of these charges? Prosecuters suggested four to eight years in state prison, followed by five years probation. Personally, I don’t think that is enough for such sickening crimes.

Brockton Superior Court Judge Suzanne V. Delvecchio issued a suspended, 2 1/2-year jail term, followed by five years probation. What is wrong with these judges? This is right on the heels of Judge Edward Cashman issuing a 60-day sentence to a man who confessed to repeatedly raping a girl over a four-year period, beginning when she was 7 years old. This judge even said he didn’t even believe in punishment!

Something is defitely wrong with these judge’s judicial philosophy. Let’s pray that there are not too many judges with a mindset like this out there. Let’s hope this is not a growing way of thinking among judges across the country. The amount of power and responsibility that is placed in the hands of a judge is enormous. They are supposed to bring justice, I hardly think their sentences come anywhere near that.

Others: Wizbang

» Filed Under ACLU, News, Supreme Court


Trackback URL

Comments

13 Responses to “Judge Gives No Prison Time For Gay Rapist Teacher”

  1. Linoge on January 18th, 2006 7:17 pm

    … That is outright amazing. Disgusting, but amazing. The kind of thing one reads and thinks there is a punchline somewhere… *sigh*

  2. Goose on January 18th, 2006 7:59 pm

    This is pathetic. This kind of thing makes me nuts. This is not a political issue and if this gets national attention, it will be interesting to see if the left finds a way to defend this type of gross incompatence.

  3. Psycmeistr on January 18th, 2006 9:00 pm

    Judges such as these are the vehicle through which the ACLU and their ilk get their agenda imposed..

  4. Mrs. Happy Housewife on January 18th, 2006 9:35 pm

    To deny a raped child justice is equal to victimizing him or her all over again. Perhaps if these liberal judges had ever had to live through a rape, they might rule differently. Shame on them!

  5. Daryl Cobranchi on January 19th, 2006 6:21 am

    It’s not quite the way you presented it. The “rape” was a consensual act. Because the boy was under 16, by law he cannot consent. So, it’s statutory rape.

    The boy’s story also changed during the course of the investigation.

    Hint: Always track these stories back to the local press.

  6. Stevie James on January 19th, 2006 8:52 am

    Pedophiliaphobia

    Pedophiliaphobia, an irrational fear of pedophiles, is sweeping the nation. It is based primarily on the false notion that anyone with an attraction to minors cannot control themselves. The existence of draconian laws plays into this falsehood because only those who are accused of committing crimes come to the attention of the public, or for that matter, nearly anyone’s attention.

    It is characterized by stereotyping (assuming that an individual has traits and behaviors generally associated, rightly or wrongly, with a group) and demonizing. The comments in this discussion evidence this.

    See these links. http://hfp.puellula.com/Main.html http://observer.guardian.co.uk/screen/story/0,6903,532307,00.html and http://www.boychat.org/messages/921997.htm

  7. Where's my Haldol? on January 19th, 2006 2:01 pm

    “Something is defitely wrong with these judge’s judicial philosophy.”

    For once, you have cleanly *understated* your case. This guy must have been blowing the judge to weasel out of this with no jail time. This is as nutty as letting a stalker who beats his ex-wife to within an inch of her life off with a $25 fine.

  8. ryan on January 19th, 2006 8:27 pm

    Shameful. Activists judges are running rampant and endangering the American public all throughout the country-this is nothing but another example of it, and also another example why we need Judge Alito on the bench.

  9. RightWingConspirator on January 19th, 2006 11:59 pm

    “Pedophiliaphobia, an irrational fear of pedophiles, is sweeping the nation. It is based primarily on the false notion that anyone with an attraction to minors cannot control themselves. The existence of draconian laws plays into this falsehood because only those who are accused of committing crimes come to the attention of the public, or for that matter, nearly anyone’s attention.”

    Well, obviously, in this case the guy couldn’t (or rather, wouldn’t) control himself, because he raped a kid.

    Kinda derails your entire argument when the guy actually did it.

  10. Peter Bella on January 20th, 2006 12:26 am

    The agenda. We must stay on the agenda. Their agenda is to convince us that this is normal, healthy behavior.

    My agenda is, let’s just say if it were my child, well, ahem, ahhh, you can’t have a trial if the defendant “doesn’t show up.”

  11. Donna Ruffalo on January 20th, 2006 1:28 am

    If a person robbed a bank,stole someones car,sit fire to thier house,put a cut off piece of finger in a bowl of chli,took drugs,they get alot of time in prison. But when a person rapes a child (boy or girl) they might go to jail for 60 days or not at all. If justs goes to show you what matters most to some people. There money. Well let them still the money up their *** and let us THE POEPLE bring make a vigillantee. Hang the judges and the child molesters. The world would be a better place with out them here.

  12. Stevie James on January 20th, 2006 6:31 am
  13. Peter Bella on January 20th, 2006 2:48 pm

    Several years ago in New Orleans a young boy was being used sexually by his karate instructor. When it came to light, the instructor left town, taking the boy with him. After much media coverage, he contacted the authorities were contacted and an agreement was made to meet the instructor at the airport.

    The media was there as well. As the cameras rolled. The authorities were walking down the concourse. The camera panned to the instructor and the boy. As they walked toward the police, they had to pass a bank of phones. A man was on the phone. As the instructor passed him, the man shot and killed him. He was the boy’s father.

    Long story short, the prosecutor was told that if he even thought of indicting the father, he could kiss his political career good bye. This was by the people who lived in the Parish. They rallied behind the father, knowing full well that there would be no justice. Oh, the prosecutor; he was Harry Connick Sr. His son is the crooner.

    Just a little tale to demonstrate what our legal system has wrought.