PETA Freak Stephen Dujack Off Democrat’s Witness List

Posted on January 8, 2006

Friday we mentioned the low life plan of the democrats to smear Alito as a racist because of a group he was a member of back in his college days. Well, now according to Fox News it looks as if their star witness has been scratched from the playbook.

A key witness to the character of Judge Samuel A. Alito has been removed from the Senate Judiciary Committee Democrats’ testimony list, FOXNews.com has learned.

Stephen R. Dujack, editor of The Environmental Forum magazine and fellow Princeton University alumnus, was expected to testify about a controversial student organization that counted Alito as a member. Dujack confirmed to FOXNews.com late Friday that he was no longer testifying, but said he could not elaborate.

A spokesman for Texas Republican Sen. John Cornyn, a committee member, said he had been notified of the list change shortly before 7 p.m. EST. Earlier on Friday, Cornyn’s office circulated a 2003 Los Angeles Times editorial in which Dujack compared animals killed for food to victims of the Holocaust. Whether the editorial factored into the decision to drop Dujack from the witness list was not clear.

Here’s a little excerpt of their former star witness’s sanity.

Like the victims of the Holocaust, animals are rounded up, trucked hundreds of miles to the kill floor and slaughtered. Comparisons to the Holocaust are not only appropriate but inescapable because, whether we wish to admit it or not, cows, chickens, pigs and turkeys are as capable of feeling loneliness, fear, pain, joy and affection as we are. To those who defend the modern-day holocaust on animals by saying that animals are slaughtered for food and give us sustenance, I ask: If the victims of the Holocaust had been eaten, would that have justified the abuse and murder? Did the fact that lampshades, soaps and other “useful” products were made from their bodies excuse the Holocaust? No. Pain is pain.

So their witness had compared killing animals for food to Holocaust victims. That sounds like the definition a democrat would give a sane, reliable, unbiased witness to someone’s character. I’m sure the dems are disappointed, that their secret plan, was shot down so easy, but with the Confirmation Process set to begin tommorow, they are still flailing around trying to throw anything that might stick. Remember dems, if you are going to try to salvage credibility in your partisan attacks, don’t choose a PETA freak for your star witness. However, I’m sure the dems can think of another dumb idea or three.
Others: Captain’s Quarters
Blogs for Bush
California Conservative
4 The Little Guy
Decision 08
Confirm Them
Another great post on Alito at Professor Bainbridge

» Filed Under News, Supreme Court

Trackback URL

Comments

3 Responses to “PETA Freak Stephen Dujack Off Democrat’s Witness List”

Bob on January 9th, 2006 10:19 am

So let me get this straight - Dujack is not a reliable witness because he is opposed to cruelty to animals, but Alito is a good supreme candidate because he supports torture, religion, kidnapping, absolute presidential power and an illegal war. Right.
Lug on January 9th, 2006 10:33 am

Hey Bob!!! Animal worshipers are unstable….okay???
Alexandra on January 9th, 2006 1:53 pm

Bob,

So let me get this straight - Dujack is not a reliable witness

Reliable? Isn’t credible the word you are looking for? Statements like:

If the victims of the Holocaust had been eaten, would that have justified the abuse and murder?

would simply have got him laughed out of the Senate. A political decision as usual, you don’t seriously think anything else matters do you?