ACLU Savors Latest Victory
Posted on September 30, 2005
New York, the site of the 2001 World Trade Center collapse at the hands of Islamic terrorists. Who used 2 commercial airplanes as guided missiles killing nearly 3,000 innocent civilians. New York, the financial center of the American economy and the home to one of the most aggressive chapters of the ACLU.
The NYCLU (the New York Chapter) has opposed random bag searches of subway passengers. Passengers who have been overwhelmingly cooperative and receptive to the practice. The NYCLU who is waging war against military recruiters offering a better way of life to the under privileged and appealing to the patriotic who may want their chance to serve and protect this nation against further attacks like the one which decimated New York in 2001.
These people have an agenda. Their agenda is to implement an internal revolution through the use of a judicial coup d’etat. And their best weapon, activist judges such as Alvin K. Hellerstein.
During the hearings held last week over the nomination and confirmation of Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr, we heard from both sides of the aisle on the subject of activist judges. Republicans (actually Conservatives) see an activist judge as someone who uses his position on the bench to make rulings outside the mainstream. And in doing so, either creates new law, or modifies existing law through rulings which are contrary to the best interests of the nation. Democrats, see activist judges as those who would shut down their liberal interpretation of the Constitution. A judge which will see in passed legislation provisions which violate not the phantom “Spirit” of the Constitution, but the actual meaning of the founding document of this nation. In other words, Strict Constructionists who see the Constitution as a static document with expressed meanings instead of implied meanings.
By definition, Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein is an activist Judge. He has made a ruling which has put the national security of the United States and its citizens in danger. And by doing so, has violated his oath of office to “Support and Defend the Constitution of the United States, against all enemies foreign and domestic.” The ACLU is an enemy of the Constitution of the United States and sadly, they are a domestic one.
Their tactics of extortion and judicial terrorism is putting the American people in danger. And why are they doing this? To conform to the goals of one of their co-founders, Roger Nash Baldwin.
“I am for socialism, disarmament, and, ultimately, for abolishing the state itself… I seek the social ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class, and the sole control of those who produce wealth. Communism is the goal.”
Since the collapse of their beloved Soviet Union, the ACLU has stepped up their anti-American activities by supporting causes which cast the United States in bad light. By their defense of foreign terrorists being held in accordance of the rules of war. And by their need to release images of abuses committed by a few stupid individuals who chose to violate their own oaths.
Those who committed these crimes against humanity did so without orders. They did so out of ignorance. They did so on their own.
I do hold those who were in command responsible for the simple fact that they allowed a collapse of discipline to happen within their command. But to release additional photos to the world would only serve to further the cause of those who are waging the war of insurgency in Iraq. And strengthen the resolve of terrorists who wish to do our people and government harm.
They have been on the down swing of things since the ending of that war. Since the cut-and-run. They won that battle. But now we have a chance to show them that we do not share their radical agenda. We do not want to live in the United Soviet States of Amerika.
I am calling on everyone to write your Senators demanding the impeachment of Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein. Oh yes, he can be impeached. The charge - violation of his oath of office. The specification - aiding an enemies of the Constitution of the United States, the ACLU and foreign terrorists who would gain by the release of these photos.
Blogger’s 1st Amendment Pledge
If the FEC makes rules that limit my First Amendment right to express my opinion on core political issues, I will not obey those rules.
Gribbit is a contributing writer at Stop The ACLU and the co-founder and administrator of Stop The ACLU BlogBurst.
» Filed Under Communism, War On Terror
Trackback URL
Comments
6 Responses to “ACLU Savors Latest Victory”





























SCOTUS Docket No 02-1412
Bird V Gray Davis et al
June 23, 2003
The Second Amendment has had it’s day in court. There is no individual right to keep and bear arms.
9th circuit ruling stands
What the @%#! has that got to do with the subject that I have written about?!?
Upon a review of the information that you have presented, Richard the troll, you have cited a case that the 9th Circuit refused to hear, so it was appealed to the SCOTUS which also refused to hear the case. How you can construe that to mean that there is no individual right to bear arms is beyond me. By refusing to hear the case, it would seem to anyone who has half a brain that the burden of proof was insufficiant to base a case upon. In other words, the court refused to hear the case because the attorney filing the case was a moron like you.
Next time try using a website of your own. Sending those who wish to counter your diluted viewpoint to the Narcotics Anonymous website is unacceptable.
WTF?
Does the ACLU defend the second amendment?
NO. The point is made.
This is a public forum.
I used it.
To Gribbits:
Richard E. Prestwich
Prestwich and Assocites
Advertising Copy Writers
Market Position and
Media Strategists
Pray tell oh great print orator,
How many votes are you worth?
How many elections have your copy and strategy turned?
How many Congressmen and Senators do not want you in a bad mood when they seek reelection?
Have your efforts cost dishonest slurp at the public trough lawyers more or less than $670 million?
Oil Slick Slade Gorton (R) WA chose to lose reelection to Maria Cantwell (D) Wa rather than investigate and discipline Federal Judge Alan McDonald, Spokane Wa.
No Federal Judge will be impeached for this kind of ruling.
Now do you want to take advantage of the only thing Senators and Congressmen fear or do you want to rant on your soap box and remain as effective as a rubber with a hole in it on election day?