ACLU Jihad On American Military
Posted on September 16, 2005
O.K, we all saw the pictures of the throat slitting mullahs with panties on there heads. It shocked the nation! It sparked flag burning throughout the Middle East! It fueled the hatred of the “religion of peace.” Wasn’t it enough? Not for the ACLU, they want to continue adding fuel to the fire. Already the jihadis have picked up the news.
The civil rights group released on Thursday 1,800 pages of documents obtained from the government as part of a federal lawsuit seeking information on the treatment of U.S.-held detainees.
The U.S. military was widely criticized after pictures of guards abusing detainees in Abu Ghraib prison outside Baghdad were made public in April 2004.
ACLU said the documents, taken from interviews conducted for a 2004 investigation by Lt. Gen. Paul Mikolashek, the Army’s inspector general, contradict the investigation’s findings that there were no systematic failures that led to detainee abuse.
Lets see the ACLU represent an American soldier’s treatment being held captive by a terrorist. It won’t happen of course. That would be outside their jurisdiction. However, representing the enemy and telling them they have rights to refuse answering interrogations from our soldiers seems to somehow fall within their jurisdicition. Why does our government allow these acts of treason to go on? It’s obvious which side the ACLU has chosen in this war, and it isn’t “American” civil liberties.
Linked at Bright and Early and Cafe Oregano and Jo’s Cafe Friday Specials.
» Filed Under War On Terror
Trackback URL
Comments
6 Responses to “ACLU Jihad On American Military”
-
Affiliations
The Giants
-
Donate
Steal Me
Our Store
Click the design to visit our store and help Stop the ACLU!
More blogs about the ACLU
Hey there! Good to have ya back. Here’s another book you may like: ACLU vs. America. The site is only to buy the book, but it is set up by the ADF. See ya later.
I wonder if you have ever read the Constitution of the United States and Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist # 84.
Yes fred most of the people on the site have read the constitution and Hamilton’s #84 that is why we are complaining about the way the ACLU is spinning the truth about the consitution. There is nothing in the consitution that says separation of church and state. separation of church and state is an ACLU myth./
Yes fred most of the people on the site have read the constitution and Hamilton’s #84 that is why we are complaining about the way the ACLU is spinning the truth about the consitution. There is nothing in the consitution that says separation of church and state. separation of church and state is an ACLU myth./
“The Mikolashek report concluded that the prisoner abuses were not a result of systematic failures,” he said. “These documents flatly contradict that conclusion, and point to the failure to adequately train soldiers and a failure to require that abuse be reported.”
Why do you say the ACLU is representing the enemy? They are representing the people of the US, for whom the gov’t works. If you are a boss, and your underling [edited] you, you *should* be pissed. Demand the truth, accept no substitutes.
“Why do you say the ACLU is representing the enemy?”
Um, because they are?
“They are representing the people of the US”
None of the people held in Gitmo are US citizens; they’re actually people who have vowed to kill Americans any chance they get. The ACLU’s representing them.