» Where Were You, ACLU?
Constitutional Ignorance and the ACLU »

ACLU and Gays

Posted on September 9, 2005

Despite the ACLU’s whining, the people of California said no to gay marraige. After fighting the will of the people and losing, now the legislative body are trying to go around the will of the people. However, it will not succeed.

A majority of voters in the US state of California backed a proposition five years ago defining marriage here as the union of a man and a woman, and Schwarzenegger is standing by that mandate, said spokeswoman Margita Thompson.

“Our of respect for the will of the people, the governor will veto (the bill),” Thompson said in a written release.

Schwarzenegger “believes the matter should be determined not by legislative action - which would be unconstitutional - but by court decision or another vote of the people of our state.”Source

I’m sure the ACLU are disapointed with this. I can almost hear the whining now.

Alan Sears has a great column on this subject.

Unable to woo a wary electorate, they are taking the country to court, where their American Civil Liberties Union allied attorneys are trying to force a shotgun wedding of homosexual behavioral mores to traditional American values.

Despite the resounding decision of voters in 18 states to uphold marriage as the union of one man and one woman, despite the laws enacted by 37 legislatures, and despite the rulings of dozens of local, state, and federal judges, advocates of homosexual behavior and their ACLU attorneys demand that not only the laws of the United States, but the moral, behavioral and cultural code of civilization itself, be changed to suit their personal demands and preferences.

Imagine that tonight, in stadiums all over the United States, Major League Baseball games are disrupted by an invasion of football players, running by dozens and hundreds out onto the diamonds.

“We want to play, too!” the game-crashers cry.

“But this is baseball,” a pitcher points out. “It’s a totally different game.”

“Not fair!” the invaders insist. “We demand that you let us play! And here - use our ball. Re-line the field. And play by our NFL rules!”

“It won’t work,” says a shortstop. “You can’t pitch pigskin.”

“Foul!” scream the footballers to ESPN cameras. “Unsportsmanlike! Boycott baseball!”

The crowd grows restless and bellows their deafening disapproval. The umps’ thumbs are flying: “You’re outta the game!” But the helmeted Huns dig in their cleats.

“These fans are narrow-minded!” they yell. “These umps are bought and paid for! Where’s the justice? What are these ballplayers so afraid of?”

“Football-phobics?” read the morning sports pages, featuring photos of outraged outfielders, shaking their fists at runningbacks spiking balls at home plate.

Absurd? Maybe … but a not-dissimilar scenario is unfolding all over America as increasingly aggressive advocates of homosexual behavior demand legal, moral and cultural endorsement of same-sex “marriage” and other aspects of a demanding legal agenda.

It really is outrageous how the ACLU is hell bent on forcing gay marraige down America’s throat. But the ACLU is tireless in its efforts to destroy a cornerstone of American family and society’s morals. They are ruthless in this cause. They have encouraged people to defy the law in California, and they certainly disdain democracy. In states where voters have rejected the homosexual agenda, the ACLU is hard at work to undermine the results through their finely sharpened tool of judicial activism.

Linked at Jo’s Cafe

» Filed Under Homosexual Agenda


Trackback URL

Comments

3 Responses to “ACLU and Gays”

  1. merry on September 9th, 2005 1:56 am

    The subject is outlined with clear understanding and focus.

  2. Dethanial on September 9th, 2005 2:53 pm

    Even before he vetoed the bill the Gays are saying he will easly be defeated in the next election. How stupid are these people. If the major of the population of California are against queer marriage as any decent person would be, how is he going to be defeated by a minority.

  3. Macker on September 10th, 2005 3:21 pm

    Maybe the gays should have a “Screw Abstinence” party in public like NARAL to prove their point.

» Where Were You, ACLU?
Constitutional Ignorance and the ACLU »