<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Government Expropriates Child on Behalf of Lesbian Ex</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/12/31/government-expropriates-child-on-behalf-of-lesbian-ex/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/12/31/government-expropriates-child-on-behalf-of-lesbian-ex/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:23:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hazumu Osaragi</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/12/31/government-expropriates-child-on-behalf-of-lesbian-ex/comment-page-1/#comment-132060</link>
		<dc:creator>Hazumu Osaragi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 23:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=31125#comment-132060</guid>
		<description>Katie;

What if a married traditional couple tried to conceive, but it was found that, for whatever reason, the man was infertile.  Let&#039;s also say they&#039;re Muslim (but not practicing.)  The couple agrees to artificial insemination.  Three years later, the wife divorces.  She get&#039;s custody, but her husband gets liberal visitation rights.  Then, she converts to Christianity.  Does she have the right to deny her former husband ANY visitation with the child?  After all, he&#039;s infertile, so he didn&#039;t contribute any genetic material.  And he&#039;s still a Muslim, even though he doesn&#039;t go to mosque.  Does he lose all visitation rights?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katie;</p>
<p>What if a married traditional couple tried to conceive, but it was found that, for whatever reason, the man was infertile.  Let&#8217;s also say they&#8217;re Muslim (but not practicing.)  The couple agrees to artificial insemination.  Three years later, the wife divorces.  She get&#8217;s custody, but her husband gets liberal visitation rights.  Then, she converts to Christianity.  Does she have the right to deny her former husband ANY visitation with the child?  After all, he&#8217;s infertile, so he didn&#8217;t contribute any genetic material.  And he&#8217;s still a Muslim, even though he doesn&#8217;t go to mosque.  Does he lose all visitation rights?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/12/31/government-expropriates-child-on-behalf-of-lesbian-ex/comment-page-1/#comment-132022</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 07:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=31125#comment-132022</guid>
		<description>Since when does a step-parent have any rights over the birth parent?  This is ridiculous!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since when does a step-parent have any rights over the birth parent?  This is ridiculous!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: archer52</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/12/31/government-expropriates-child-on-behalf-of-lesbian-ex/comment-page-1/#comment-131994</link>
		<dc:creator>archer52</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 19:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=31125#comment-131994</guid>
		<description>Ok, you&#039;ve topped yourself this time.  I visit your site to get good ideas about how bad the left has become.  But this, this is simply madness.  Truthfully, if this were a male/female relationship the court, outside the mother being found super unfit, would never rule for the father.  Believe me, I know from experience as my buddy spent tens of thousands of dollars proving his wife was a nutjob before the court let him have custody.  And when I mean nutjob, I mean pill popping, bed hopping serial adulterer with serious mental issues.  It was CLOSE after all of that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, you&#8217;ve topped yourself this time.  I visit your site to get good ideas about how bad the left has become.  But this, this is simply madness.  Truthfully, if this were a male/female relationship the court, outside the mother being found super unfit, would never rule for the father.  Believe me, I know from experience as my buddy spent tens of thousands of dollars proving his wife was a nutjob before the court let him have custody.  And when I mean nutjob, I mean pill popping, bed hopping serial adulterer with serious mental issues.  It was CLOSE after all of that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

