Government Expropriates Child on Behalf of Lesbian Ex
Posted on December 31, 2009
Remember the anti-drug adds with the eggs frying on the skillet and the voice intoning, “This is your mind on drugs”? This is a family on moonbattery:
The birth mother of a 7-year-old Virginia girl must transfer custody of the child to the woman’s former lesbian partner, a Vermont judge ruled, adding that it seems the woman has “disappeared” with her daughter.
Vermont Family Court Judge William Cohen ordered Lisa Miller of Winchester, Va., to turn over daughter Isabella to Janet Jenkins of Fair Haven at 1 p.m. Friday at the Virginia home of Jenkins’ parents.
Now why would a Vermont judge want to give a woman’s birth daughter to her former lesbian lover?
Miller and Jenkins were joined in a Vermont civil union in 2000. Isabella was born to Miller through artificial insemination in 2002. The couple broke up in 2003, and Miller moved to Virginia, renounced homosexuality and became an evangelical Christian.
The culture war rages on — with only the good guys taking any casualties.
If Miller does not turn over Isabella, the most likely scenerio is that she would be held in contempt of court and a warrant would be issued for her arrest, said Cheryl Hanna, a professor of constitutional law at Vermont Law School.
As moonbattery continues to derange our civilization, look for jails to fill with people incarcerated for increasingly bizarre reasons.
On a tip from Muddypaw. Cross-posted at Moonbattery.
» Filed Under Activist Judges, Child Exploitation, Christianity, Communism, Government corruption, Government malfeasance/misfeasance, Government tyranny, Homosexual Agenda, Judicial Tyranny, Liberal World, Social Engineering, State Government, State Sovereignty, States Rights
Trackback URL
Comments
3 Responses to “Government Expropriates Child on Behalf of Lesbian Ex”
Leave a Reply
Ok, you’ve topped yourself this time. I visit your site to get good ideas about how bad the left has become. But this, this is simply madness. Truthfully, if this were a male/female relationship the court, outside the mother being found super unfit, would never rule for the father. Believe me, I know from experience as my buddy spent tens of thousands of dollars proving his wife was a nutjob before the court let him have custody. And when I mean nutjob, I mean pill popping, bed hopping serial adulterer with serious mental issues. It was CLOSE after all of that!
Since when does a step-parent have any rights over the birth parent? This is ridiculous!
Katie;
What if a married traditional couple tried to conceive, but it was found that, for whatever reason, the man was infertile. Let’s also say they’re Muslim (but not practicing.) The couple agrees to artificial insemination. Three years later, the wife divorces. She get’s custody, but her husband gets liberal visitation rights. Then, she converts to Christianity. Does she have the right to deny her former husband ANY visitation with the child? After all, he’s infertile, so he didn’t contribute any genetic material. And he’s still a Muslim, even though he doesn’t go to mosque. Does he lose all visitation rights?