<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marriage Hating &#8216;Psychologist&#8217; Calls Palin a &#8216;Special Liar&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/11/22/marriage-hating-psychologist-calls-palin-a-special-liar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/11/22/marriage-hating-psychologist-calls-palin-a-special-liar/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:01:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/11/22/marriage-hating-psychologist-calls-palin-a-special-liar/comment-page-1/#comment-130083</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=29956#comment-130083</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s what the oh-so-intelligent Bella DePaulo Ph.D.  doesn&#039;t know, won&#039;t see, and probably doesn&#039;t want anyone else to know either...

You know they are hiding costs all over the place, and tucking in pieces of the legislation here and there where it won&#039;t get detected until it is too late... so Obama can say they won&#039;t cover any illegals as he prepares to grant amnesty that will ensure the &quot;truth&quot; of that statement... if you&#039;ve been following it you&#039;ve seen example after example...

Here&#039;s the deal - &lt;a href=&quot;http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2009/11/there-are-no-death-panels-in-obamacare.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;There is NO Death Panel in the Obamacare Bill: It Was In Stimulus Bill&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;i&gt;Back in February, former NY State Lieutenant Governor Betsy McCaughey described the provision: 

(Page numbers refer to H.R. 1 EH, pdf version).  

The bill’s health rules will affect “every individual in the United States” (445, 454, 479). Your medical treatments will be tracked electronically by a federal system. Having electronic medical records at your fingertips, easily transferred to a hospital, is beneficial. It will help avoid duplicate tests and errors. 

But the bill goes further. One new bureaucracy, the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology, will monitor treatments to make sure your doctor is doing what the federal government deems appropriate and cost effective. The goal is to reduce costs and “guide” your doctor’s decisions (442, 446). These provisions in the stimulus bill are virtually identical to what Daschle prescribed in his 2008 book, “Critical: What We Can Do About the Health-Care Crisis.” According to Daschle, doctors have to give up autonomy and “learn to operate less like solo practitioners.” 

Keeping doctors informed of the newest medical findings is important, but enforcing uniformity goes too far.... &lt;/i&gt;

Read it all, it is important.

&lt;i&gt;The Official Name of the &quot;Death Panels&quot; is the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research 
The stimulus bill does that, and calls it the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research (190-192). The goal, Daschle’s book explained, is to slow the development and use of new medications and technologies because they are driving up costs. He praises Europeans for being more willing to accept “hopeless diagnoses” and “forgo experimental treatments,” and he chastises Americans for expecting too much from the health-care system. 
Its kind of a reverse stimulus, the government is trying to make sure that the invention and innovation that is so ingrained in the American Tradition gets slowed down. The provision trades saving lives for saving money.  The Council has already been empaneled and it includes Dr Ezekiel  &quot;lets kill grandma&quot; Emanuel:
This civic republican or deliberative democratic conception of the good provides both procedural and substantive insights for developing a just allocation of health care resources. Procedurally, it suggests the need for public forums to deliberate about which health services should be considered basic and should be socially guaranteed. Substantively, it suggests services that promote the continuation of the polity-those that ensure healthy future generations, ensure development of practical reasoning skills, and ensure full and active participation by citizens in public deliberations-are to be socially guaranteed as basic. Conversely, services provided to individuals who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens are not basic and should not be guaranteed. An obvious example is not guaranteeing health services to patients with dementia. 

In other words, Sorry Grandma your time is up.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s what the oh-so-intelligent Bella DePaulo Ph.D.  doesn&#8217;t know, won&#8217;t see, and probably doesn&#8217;t want anyone else to know either&#8230;</p>
<p>You know they are hiding costs all over the place, and tucking in pieces of the legislation here and there where it won&#8217;t get detected until it is too late&#8230; so Obama can say they won&#8217;t cover any illegals as he prepares to grant amnesty that will ensure the &#8220;truth&#8221; of that statement&#8230; if you&#8217;ve been following it you&#8217;ve seen example after example&#8230;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the deal &#8211; <a href="http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2009/11/there-are-no-death-panels-in-obamacare.html" rel="nofollow">There is NO Death Panel in the Obamacare Bill: It Was In Stimulus Bill</a><br />
<i>Back in February, former NY State Lieutenant Governor Betsy McCaughey described the provision: </p>
<p>(Page numbers refer to H.R. 1 EH, pdf version).  </p>
<p>The bill’s health rules will affect “every individual in the United States” (445, 454, 479). Your medical treatments will be tracked electronically by a federal system. Having electronic medical records at your fingertips, easily transferred to a hospital, is beneficial. It will help avoid duplicate tests and errors. </p>
<p>But the bill goes further. One new bureaucracy, the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology, will monitor treatments to make sure your doctor is doing what the federal government deems appropriate and cost effective. The goal is to reduce costs and “guide” your doctor’s decisions (442, 446). These provisions in the stimulus bill are virtually identical to what Daschle prescribed in his 2008 book, “Critical: What We Can Do About the Health-Care Crisis.” According to Daschle, doctors have to give up autonomy and “learn to operate less like solo practitioners.” </p>
<p>Keeping doctors informed of the newest medical findings is important, but enforcing uniformity goes too far&#8230;. </i></p>
<p>Read it all, it is important.</p>
<p><i>The Official Name of the &#8220;Death Panels&#8221; is the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research<br />
The stimulus bill does that, and calls it the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research (190-192). The goal, Daschle’s book explained, is to slow the development and use of new medications and technologies because they are driving up costs. He praises Europeans for being more willing to accept “hopeless diagnoses” and “forgo experimental treatments,” and he chastises Americans for expecting too much from the health-care system.<br />
Its kind of a reverse stimulus, the government is trying to make sure that the invention and innovation that is so ingrained in the American Tradition gets slowed down. The provision trades saving lives for saving money.  The Council has already been empaneled and it includes Dr Ezekiel  &#8220;lets kill grandma&#8221; Emanuel:<br />
This civic republican or deliberative democratic conception of the good provides both procedural and substantive insights for developing a just allocation of health care resources. Procedurally, it suggests the need for public forums to deliberate about which health services should be considered basic and should be socially guaranteed. Substantively, it suggests services that promote the continuation of the polity-those that ensure healthy future generations, ensure development of practical reasoning skills, and ensure full and active participation by citizens in public deliberations-are to be socially guaranteed as basic. Conversely, services provided to individuals who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens are not basic and should not be guaranteed. An obvious example is not guaranteeing health services to patients with dementia. </p>
<p>In other words, Sorry Grandma your time is up.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/11/22/marriage-hating-psychologist-calls-palin-a-special-liar/comment-page-1/#comment-129983</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=29956#comment-129983</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not the only hit piece that appeared on Psychology Today. Here&#039;s the other one:

Palintology: How Neo-Cons Misrepresent Representative Government

http://bit.ly/5BmzFi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not the only hit piece that appeared on Psychology Today. Here&#8217;s the other one:</p>
<p>Palintology: How Neo-Cons Misrepresent Representative Government</p>
<p><a href="http://bit.ly/5BmzFi" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/5BmzFi</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

