As AGW Is Exposed As A Hoax, EU President Tells Us The Real Purpose
Posted on November 21, 2009
On Friday, we found out that the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit server was hacked, which was, as The Air Vent put it, 62mb of gold. The files, especially the emails, are very damning to the AGW movement, and could be the final nail in the coffin of human induced global warming, er, climate change, whateverthehell they are calling it this week. They show collusion, corruption, manipulation, and obstruction. As Andrew Bolt puts it
Conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data, possibly illegal destruction of embarrassing information, organised resistance to disclosure, manipulation of data, private admissions of flaws in their public claims and much more.
Emails such as this
I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline. (Watts Up With That? has a good breakdown of this email as it relates to the so-called hockey stick)
We see fantasies of violence against skeptics, gloating at the death of skeptic John L. Daly, suppression of evidence, and forcing dissenting views out of academia. Wouldn’t want people to actually practice science, you know.
The big media is covering it, and, in some cases, trying to spin it away, as the NY Times tries, along with the Guardian. Others get all sorts of “hey, let’s cover both sides of the issue fairly,” which only happens when they know their side is in deep doo doo.
Michelle Malkin calls it the climate scandal of the century, but, I’m not so sure about that. The entire issue of anthropogenic global warming is a scandal. A fake issue that originally started as a few scientists wondering if Mankind’s output of greenhouse gasses, in particular, CO2, were causing a warming trend. This was quickly hijacked by people who realized they could use it to make themselves some money, often mandated by Government, turn themselves into stars, and, oh, initiate a way to put people, companies, and economies, heck, even countries, under the control of Government, just as their 70’s and 80’s love of the repressive Soviet Union government told them to.
Don’t believe me? We’ve heard about it many times before. Lord Monckton stated that he had read the Copenhagen draft treaty, and it would be the death knell of American sovereignty and freedom. Oh, and here’s EU President Herman Van Rompuy, telling us what the point is
“The Climate Conference in Copenhagen is another step forward towards the global management of our planet…”
Fortunately, we are learning that the Boxer/Kerry cap n’ screw you legislation is pretty much dead, just like the AGW movement after the hacking of the CRU server. Of course, some Climahysterics would be happy when some of the bigger names in the anti-AGW movement kick the bucket and stop exposing the insanity and BS coming from Climahysterics.
Crossed at Pirate’s Cove
» Filed Under AGW hyposterics, Agenda based science, Bald-face lies, Cap & Trade, Fraud/misrepresentation, Global Warming, Government, Government corruption, Government tyranny, Journalistic Malpractice, Journalistic Prostitution, Journalistic incompetence, Liberal Media/Bias, News, Research/surveys, Science/pseudo-science, Totalitarianism, Video
Trackback URL
Comments
9 Responses to “As AGW Is Exposed As A Hoax, EU President Tells Us The Real Purpose”
Leave a Reply
***
Don’t believe that CRAP AND TAX is dead. It’s just in suspended animation until Comrade Obama (PBUH) and his congressional ilk wake it up and cram it down our throats soon.
***
Rocketman
***
Do they really believe that China is just going to roll over and accept this? China, unless they take a lead roll will tell them to stuff it. The Chinese have been stealthily colonizing Africa to meet its expanding energy needs for years. China doesnt need these fools they need China.
The dream of a one world govt is of the used to be Europeans powers that have dug a grave for themselves and are looking for someone to pull their arses out of it.
I’ve seen too much evidence that man is having an effect on the climate to regard it nothing more than a hoax without some serious evidence. Lets see how this all pans out. If this is all true we should see some skeptical scientist doing who previously accepted the idea of man induced climate change doing one eighties. If not, you guys may end up being rather embarrassed.
The religion of global warming
Day 1 Gore creates coal
Day 2 Gore creates man
Day 3 Gore teaches man to burn coal
Day 4 Gore teaches man how to turn burning coal into electricity
Day 5 Gore invents the internet
Day 6 Gore gets rich in teaching man how global warming is killing the planet and paying tribute to Gore is the only way to save the planet.
Day 7 Gore sits in his mansion stuffing his face with ho hos and ding dongs while counting the tributes paid him by gullible fools.
And what, exactly, is that evidence, Damien? Where does it come from? How is it obtained? Why won’t the Hadley CRU, among others, let us see the raw data? Why are so many measuring stations in sub-optimal areas?
Exactly what is the relationship between CO2 and warming? Notice how you use the term “climate change,” because global warming just isn’t working out. Y’all like to use a starting point of 1980, because the rise in temps seems to equal the rise in CO2, yet, looking farther back, we see a ontinued rise in CO2 after the 1930’s, yet, a cooling trend. We see a continued rise in CO2 since 1998, yet, no warming. Stagnent temps. If CO2 is a greenhouse gas, why does it get cooler?
But, hey, keep drinking the kool aid. And how about ponying up some actual evidence?
Damien.
Do a little research on your own, you will find it quite edifying.
You will also find that a number of MAJOR IPCC scientists have jumped ship in the past ten years.
Will that help you along?
You’ll notice the America has been producing less and less emissions each year since Nixon. It seems to me what the Global Warming activists don’t want us to know is what we do either has no effect, or is already working and we don’t NEED more things like cap and trade.
Oh look! Its a Global Warming… errr I meant, Climate Change Lemming.
Aren’t they extinct yet?
Take a hike, Damien.
There is NO consensus on AGW.
There is NO correlation between CO2 levels and global temperature increases. In fact, quite the opposite.
A ten-year, three separate points of global measurement, graph indicated that while CO2 levels rose steadily, overall average global temps actually declined by almost one degree.
(Notice that many liberals are calling it ‘Climate Change’ now?)
What consensus there IS is that India and China, two of the worlds largest polluters at the moment, will NOT sign on to any treaty that obligates them to reduce emissions at all.
There is also consensus that forcing Kyoto-style cap-and-tax legislation, minus international reciprocity on the USA will be an economic and libertarian disaster and will NOT affect CO2 levels or improve nonexistent ‘climate change’.
All Americans will suffer, ESPECIALLY the poorest who will be hit hardest by astronomical gasoline and heating oil prices.
The UN knows they can never invade and conquer America by the conventional route of armed might.
Instead they rely on their obedient Democratic fifth columns in Congress, education and the media.