Comments on: USA Today Uses Attack Book to Talk Palin’s

By: rod stanton

rod stanton — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:22:22 +0000

Yes! Had they not been caught they’d had no regrets!
After reading the Press/media for 66 years I expect no less bias/bigotry than that.

That the NYT+LAT circulations have been down for 30 years does -NOT- bring tears to my eyes.

By: Rose

Rose — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:42:31 +0000

What is it about Sarah Palin that scares them so much?

And, try as they might, they cannot make her look bad.

By: munchnstuf

munchnstuf — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:01:42 +0000

I guess the layers and layers of professional fact checkers all coincidentally happened to miss the difference in “Rouge” versus “Rogue” in large print on the cover. Completely understandable for journalists who read so much. (Katie.)

By: Cyndi

Cyndi — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:00:50 +0000

The picture of the book is doctored. “Going Rouge”???