Fish Wrap Proclaims Ft. Hood Not A Terrorist Attack, Move Along
Posted on November 9, 2009
Good thing we have the New York Times to tell us these things
After two days of inquiry into the mass shooting at Fort Hood, investigators have tentatively concluded that it was not part of a terrorist plot.
Rather, they have come to believe that Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, the Army psychiatrist accused in the shootings, acted out under a welter of emotional, ideological and religious pressures, according to interviews with federal officials who have been briefed on the inquiry.
OK, so, what do we call it, Fish Wrap? Obviously, it wasn’t a well planned attack by a large group of Islamists (that we know of, considering Hasan’s ties to the mosque that several 9/11 hijackers attended.) So, let’s just say it was a typical day for a Muslim. That’s fair, right, considering so many on the Left and in the liberal media find that every minor killing by someone on the right is indicative of the entire Right, such as the murder of abortionist George Tiller.
Anyhow, it’s great that the NY Times is there to tell us it couldn’t possibly have anything to do with Islamic terrorism, right? RIGHT?
Major Nidal Malik Hasan, the gunman who killed 13 at America’s Fort Hood military base, once gave a lecture to other doctors in which he said non-believers should be beheaded and have boiling oil poured down their throats.
He also told colleagues at America’s top military hospital that non-Muslims were infidels condemned to hell who should be set on fire. The outburst came during an hour-long talk Hasan, an Army psychiatrist, gave on the Koran in front of dozens of other doctors at Walter Reed Army Medical Centre in Washington DC, where he worked for six years before arriving at Fort Hood in July.
One of Hasan’s neighbours described how on the day of the massacre, about 9am, he gave her a Koran and told her: “I’m going to do good work for God” before leaving for the base.
A civilian police officer who shot him, bringing the rampage to an end, said Hasan appeared “calm” during the massacre, hiding behind a telephone pole and shooting fellow soldiers in the back as they tried to get away.
“He was firing at people as they were trying to run and hide, said Sgt Mark Todd. “Then he turned and fired a couple of rounds at me. I didn’t hear him say a word, he just turned and fired.”
If it acts like an Islamic terrorist and talks like an Islamic terrorist, it must be an Islamic terrorist. Or, in Grey Lady World, a long man who had mental problems, and it is all America’s and the Army’s fault. Why do we have to find this stuff out from the foreign media?
» Filed Under Anti-Americanism, Delusional Dupes and DUmmies, Government malfeasance/misfeasance, Hypocrisy/Situational Ethics, Islam, Islamicfascism, Journalistic Malpractice, Journalistic Prostitution, Journalistic incompetence, Liberal Media/Bias, News, Political Correctness, RoP, Stupidity, War On Terror, liberalism, military, terrorism, terrorist appeasement
Trackback URL
Comments
4 Responses to “Fish Wrap Proclaims Ft. Hood Not A Terrorist Attack, Move Along”
Leave a Reply
Fish rap, don’t forget the NYTimes is also good for, puppy paper training, bird cage lining, paper Mache, curtains when your painting the front room, Pirate hat, park bench blanket, rags, windshield wiper, paper airplane, starting the charcoal, finger paints, daycare baby diapers, tree bandage, kite, making tearing sounds, fly swatter, dog swatter, bullhorn.
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to think “profiling” is worse than the slaughter of innocent people…
In memoriam, 9-11-2001
In memoriam, ll-5-2009
I don’t know about the snobs, skanks and various other riff-raff working for the NYToilet paper, but had I been there, I would have been pretty terrified! That’s what bterrorists do, you know, terrify people.
I’m just glad the NYToilet paper is able to give some of the wino’s drunks and dope heads, jobs.
My local cage liner is owned by the NYToilet paper, so every day we get a couple of their, hopefully, future unemployed writers’ remarks. Today Thomas Friedman told about visiting the Green Zone in Iraq. He didn’t like the civilian contracter who talked to him and felt an urge to punch the guy out. Yeah, I’m betting the outcome of that would have been a total surprise to Friedman.
If it was a white guy who held to racist ideology who shot up a military base the NYT wouldn’t hesitate to call it a terrorist act.