<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Didn&#8217;t Realize Democrat Women Were Such Hot House Flowers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/11/07/i-didnt-realize-democrat-women-were-such-hot-house-flowers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/11/07/i-didnt-realize-democrat-women-were-such-hot-house-flowers/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:01:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: William Teach</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/11/07/i-didnt-realize-democrat-women-were-such-hot-house-flowers/comment-page-1/#comment-129351</link>
		<dc:creator>William Teach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=29404#comment-129351</guid>
		<description>Kibuki is a misspelling. My bad. Spelled correctly, Kabuki, is a type of Japanese puppet show.

Hmm, Dems trot up their women folk to make a spectacle, playing the female card, lying, and we are the bad guys? LOL!

Can you prove Michelle is a liar?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kibuki is a misspelling. My bad. Spelled correctly, Kabuki, is a type of Japanese puppet show.</p>
<p>Hmm, Dems trot up their women folk to make a spectacle, playing the female card, lying, and we are the bad guys? LOL!</p>
<p>Can you prove Michelle is a liar?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pug</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/11/07/i-didnt-realize-democrat-women-were-such-hot-house-flowers/comment-page-1/#comment-129350</link>
		<dc:creator>Pug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=29404#comment-129350</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Female Democrats turn House resolution process into circus; GOP responds&lt;/i&gt;

Michelle Malkin&#039;s inertpretation.

She&#039;s a liar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Female Democrats turn House resolution process into circus; GOP responds</i></p>
<p>Michelle Malkin&#8217;s inertpretation.</p>
<p>She&#8217;s a liar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pug</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/11/07/i-didnt-realize-democrat-women-were-such-hot-house-flowers/comment-page-1/#comment-129349</link>
		<dc:creator>Pug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=29404#comment-129349</guid>
		<description>Those Republicans acted like a bunch of jerks.  Can&#039;t even allow others to speak?  What a bunch of thugs.

These rude, wimpy right-wingers must be feeling quite manly today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those Republicans acted like a bunch of jerks.  Can&#8217;t even allow others to speak?  What a bunch of thugs.</p>
<p>These rude, wimpy right-wingers must be feeling quite manly today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tbogg</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/11/07/i-didnt-realize-democrat-women-were-such-hot-house-flowers/comment-page-1/#comment-129346</link>
		<dc:creator>tbogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=29404#comment-129346</guid>
		<description>I give up. What&#039;s a  &quot;Kibuki theater&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I give up. What&#8217;s a  &#8220;Kibuki theater&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin T. Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/11/07/i-didnt-realize-democrat-women-were-such-hot-house-flowers/comment-page-1/#comment-129345</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin T. Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 00:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=29404#comment-129345</guid>
		<description>What are you babbling about? The time for debate is equal for both sides no matter how long that time is. The &quot;unanimous consent&quot; requests were nothing more than a request to &quot;revise and extend remarks&quot; (i.e., put a written statement in the Congressional Record rather than read it entirely on the House floor) - a perfectly ordinary move in these &quot;debates&quot; that allows each member to have their statement recorded while the debate itself takes less time. (Only a fraction of what appears in the Record was actually stated live in the House.) Each member makes a brief statement of her position and then asks consent to have the rest of the remarks printed. It&#039;s not much of a &quot;debate&quot;, but it&#039;s how things are done on every single bill every single day. It&#039;s perfectly ordinary, and it does nothing to delay anything.

The Republicans were the ones seeking to delay the vote, by continually interrupting the normal business of the House. They were also seeking to shut down women&#039;s voices speaking in favor of abortion rights. Their substantive point was trivial - they claimed they wanted to extend the debate from 30 minutes for each side to 60 minutes - a meaningless change they were using only to disrupt the proceedings. And it was also out of order - the rule for the debate was already established, and it is not part of parliamentary procedure to interrupt a speaker to ask to change the rule. The Republicans were using &quot;points of order&quot; - a parliamentary privilege - to disrupt on false grounds (which is why the Chair kept ruling them out of order - and they kept doing it).

In other words, the Republicans deliberately and systematically broke the rules of their own body to prevent the women in the House from stating their position. They were using the tools of debate to prevent debate. They were using democracy to shut down democracy, while the Democrats continued to attempt to act within the rules. And it is not an accident that this was overwhelmingly male Republicans acting specifically against female Democrats on an issue that only affects women.

You insist that actually following the rules of a democratic body is somehow a sign of weakness, and that women seeking to assert their own rights - democratic, and human - to act to protect their own bodies are somehow worthy of ridicule. I suppose that is not the most contemptible thing your kind has done this vicious day, but it&#039;s all too telling of how unfit for a civilized society you actually are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you babbling about? The time for debate is equal for both sides no matter how long that time is. The &#8220;unanimous consent&#8221; requests were nothing more than a request to &#8220;revise and extend remarks&#8221; (i.e., put a written statement in the Congressional Record rather than read it entirely on the House floor) &#8211; a perfectly ordinary move in these &#8220;debates&#8221; that allows each member to have their statement recorded while the debate itself takes less time. (Only a fraction of what appears in the Record was actually stated live in the House.) Each member makes a brief statement of her position and then asks consent to have the rest of the remarks printed. It&#8217;s not much of a &#8220;debate&#8221;, but it&#8217;s how things are done on every single bill every single day. It&#8217;s perfectly ordinary, and it does nothing to delay anything.</p>
<p>The Republicans were the ones seeking to delay the vote, by continually interrupting the normal business of the House. They were also seeking to shut down women&#8217;s voices speaking in favor of abortion rights. Their substantive point was trivial &#8211; they claimed they wanted to extend the debate from 30 minutes for each side to 60 minutes &#8211; a meaningless change they were using only to disrupt the proceedings. And it was also out of order &#8211; the rule for the debate was already established, and it is not part of parliamentary procedure to interrupt a speaker to ask to change the rule. The Republicans were using &#8220;points of order&#8221; &#8211; a parliamentary privilege &#8211; to disrupt on false grounds (which is why the Chair kept ruling them out of order &#8211; and they kept doing it).</p>
<p>In other words, the Republicans deliberately and systematically broke the rules of their own body to prevent the women in the House from stating their position. They were using the tools of debate to prevent debate. They were using democracy to shut down democracy, while the Democrats continued to attempt to act within the rules. And it is not an accident that this was overwhelmingly male Republicans acting specifically against female Democrats on an issue that only affects women.</p>
<p>You insist that actually following the rules of a democratic body is somehow a sign of weakness, and that women seeking to assert their own rights &#8211; democratic, and human &#8211; to act to protect their own bodies are somehow worthy of ridicule. I suppose that is not the most contemptible thing your kind has done this vicious day, but it&#8217;s all too telling of how unfit for a civilized society you actually are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/11/07/i-didnt-realize-democrat-women-were-such-hot-house-flowers/comment-page-1/#comment-129338</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=29404#comment-129338</guid>
		<description>Women are strong and equal until it comes to Democrat politics when both they and what passes for their menfolk must shield the weakness of their arguments behind their quivering [edited].

Eve Ensler must have been substituted in place of their Braveheart speech.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Women are strong and equal until it comes to Democrat politics when both they and what passes for their menfolk must shield the weakness of their arguments behind their quivering [edited].</p>
<p>Eve Ensler must have been substituted in place of their Braveheart speech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

