Comments on: S.C. Democrat: ‘Cadillac Tax’ Violates Obama’s Promise http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/10/30/s-c-democrat-cadillac-tax-violates-obamas-promise/ Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:01:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Ruth Ehrenberg http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/10/30/s-c-democrat-cadillac-tax-violates-obamas-promise/comment-page-1/#comment-130032 Ruth Ehrenberg Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:36:31 +0000 http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=29068#comment-130032 You are on top of this!!! Good for you. This tax is so horrific that it would not only be a huge working class burden but most likely tax into oblivion PPO plans that provide and preserve a patient's right to choose their own doctor and have access to adequate diagnostics and medical care. These plans would become unaffordable to both companies, especially small businesses, and middle and low income workers alike. The default plans would be HMO plans that greatly restrict doctor choice and often deny needed diagnostics and good care. You are on top of this!!! Good for you. This tax is so horrific that it would not only be a huge working class burden but most likely tax into oblivion PPO plans that provide and preserve a patient’s right to choose their own doctor and have access to adequate diagnostics and medical care.
These plans would become unaffordable to both companies, especially small businesses, and middle and low income workers alike. The default plans would be HMO plans that greatly restrict doctor choice and often deny needed diagnostics and good care.

]]> By: kerwin http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/10/30/s-c-democrat-cadillac-tax-violates-obamas-promise/comment-page-1/#comment-128876 kerwin Sat, 31 Oct 2009 07:00:55 +0000 http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=29068#comment-128876 I am going to say that tax hits me at a mere income of $35,000. The tax on medical devices also hits people of any income from the poorest to the richest. What bother me more is they are both tax on items I consider necessary. I would be more inclined to favor a tax on luxuries like sweets and soft-drinks. I am going to say that tax hits me at a mere income of $35,000. The tax on medical devices also hits people of any income from the poorest to the richest.

What bother me more is they are both tax on items I consider necessary. I would be more inclined to favor a tax on luxuries like sweets and soft-drinks.

]]>