<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Doc Quits! $160,000 Per Year Malpractice Costs the Cause</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/10/27/doc-quits-160000-per-year-malpractice-costs-the-cause/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/10/27/doc-quits-160000-per-year-malpractice-costs-the-cause/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:01:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: OB-GYN doctor quits medicine over $160,000 malpractice insurance premiums &#171; Wintery Knight</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/10/27/doc-quits-160000-per-year-malpractice-costs-the-cause/comment-page-1/#comment-128740</link>
		<dc:creator>OB-GYN doctor quits medicine over $160,000 malpractice insurance premiums &#171; Wintery Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=28942#comment-128740</guid>
		<description>[...] doctor quits medicine over $160,000 malpractice insurance&#160;premiums  Story at the NY Post. (H/T Stop the ACLU via [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] doctor quits medicine over $160,000 malpractice insurance&nbsp;premiums  Story at the NY Post. (H/T Stop the ACLU via [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Oshel</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/10/27/doc-quits-160000-per-year-malpractice-costs-the-cause/comment-page-1/#comment-128639</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Oshel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=28942#comment-128639</guid>
		<description>The problem with malpractice costs is malpractice itself.  Rather than making it difficult, if not impossible, for injured (or killed) people to be compensated, we need to stop malpractice in the first place.

National Practitioner Data Bank data shows that in most states only about two percent of physicians have been responsible for over half of all the money paid out for malpractice since 1990.  NPDB data also shows that quite often these two percent have multiple payments in their records but no action by state licensing boards to revoke their licenses or restrict their practices.  Similarly, most often no action has been taken by hospital peer reviewers to revoke or restrict their clinical privileges.  So the &quot;repeat offenders&quot; continue commit more malpractice.

Dr. Perlman ought to rechannel her frustration into an effort to get the licensing boards and peer reviewers to get serious about protecting the public from physicians with a pattern of malpractice.  

It is also worth noting that there are fewer than 20,000 malpractice payments each year for all causes although the Institute of Medicine estimates that there are about 100,000 deaths each year from malpractice.  Other sources double that number.   Only about 28 percent of malpractice payments involve patient death.  Thus we can estimate that at most only about 3 to 6 percent of all malpractice victims receive any malpractice payment.  

The real problem isn&#039;t malpractice payments.  To save money and reduce malpractice insurance premiums -- and more importantly, to save lives and prevent injury -- we need true malpractice reform that reduces malpractice itself.  We need to stop treating the symptoms -- malpractice payments -- and instead treat the disease -- malpractice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with malpractice costs is malpractice itself.  Rather than making it difficult, if not impossible, for injured (or killed) people to be compensated, we need to stop malpractice in the first place.</p>
<p>National Practitioner Data Bank data shows that in most states only about two percent of physicians have been responsible for over half of all the money paid out for malpractice since 1990.  NPDB data also shows that quite often these two percent have multiple payments in their records but no action by state licensing boards to revoke their licenses or restrict their practices.  Similarly, most often no action has been taken by hospital peer reviewers to revoke or restrict their clinical privileges.  So the &#8220;repeat offenders&#8221; continue commit more malpractice.</p>
<p>Dr. Perlman ought to rechannel her frustration into an effort to get the licensing boards and peer reviewers to get serious about protecting the public from physicians with a pattern of malpractice.  </p>
<p>It is also worth noting that there are fewer than 20,000 malpractice payments each year for all causes although the Institute of Medicine estimates that there are about 100,000 deaths each year from malpractice.  Other sources double that number.   Only about 28 percent of malpractice payments involve patient death.  Thus we can estimate that at most only about 3 to 6 percent of all malpractice victims receive any malpractice payment.  </p>
<p>The real problem isn&#8217;t malpractice payments.  To save money and reduce malpractice insurance premiums &#8212; and more importantly, to save lives and prevent injury &#8212; we need true malpractice reform that reduces malpractice itself.  We need to stop treating the symptoms &#8212; malpractice payments &#8212; and instead treat the disease &#8212; malpractice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Bryant</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/10/27/doc-quits-160000-per-year-malpractice-costs-the-cause/comment-page-1/#comment-128636</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bryant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 10:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=28942#comment-128636</guid>
		<description>To start with this looks more like a coverage issue. There need to be a look into why the rate is so high and how it compares to past rates.  If she had no claims even settled,  why did the rate go up?   New York is going through rate issues,  that are as much caused by investment profit loses and executive salaries as anything else.  
Minnesota has a system with low number of claims,  good rates and no caps.  We can talk about that any time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To start with this looks more like a coverage issue. There need to be a look into why the rate is so high and how it compares to past rates.  If she had no claims even settled,  why did the rate go up?   New York is going through rate issues,  that are as much caused by investment profit loses and executive salaries as anything else.<br />
Minnesota has a system with low number of claims,  good rates and no caps.  We can talk about that any time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

