White House Communications Director Anita Dunn Praises Chairman Mao
The true feelings surface. A Mao cheerleader! Her favorite philosopher is a mass murderer?
Email This
Posted by Jay on October 15, 2009 9:32 pm
» Filed Under Barack Obama, Communism, Government corruption, Marxism, News, Stupidity, Video, government media
Trackback URL:
Links
- Below The Beltway » Blog Archive » White House Official Quotes Mao Tse-Tung, But So Did John McCain pinged this post.
- The Strident Conservative: Motivational Tips From Mao Tse-tung...
- My Favorite Political Philosopher pinged this post.
Comments
7 Responses to “White House Communications Director Anita Dunn Praises Chairman Mao”
-
-
-
Affiliations
The Giants
Advertise
-
-
Our Store
- Click the design to visit our store and help Stop the ACLU!
-
- More blogs about the ACLU
Syndicate Me
Besides being a Maoist, she moves her tongue like a lizard. Reptilian Marxist, obviously a prime pick for this White House.
Please! If you are speaking of the snip it I heard early in the Glen Beck show then it was hardly praise. Someone should give the woman a dictionary though and point out that the correct word is “strategies” not “philosophies”. The strategy of fighting your own wars is a good strategy whomever chose to put in action.
Only through radical conservative colored glasses does she look like a supporter of Mao. That stretch would break a fairly elastic rubber band.
I suppose we could call her a vapor head but intelligent people do tend to do some foolish appearing things like use the wrong word.
In all my time I thought I would never see this crap in the U.S. What can we veterans ( I served in Iraq n Afghan ) and citizens do? It seems the Republicans are just as corrupt as the Dems. We have fallen to crap. My son cannot even say the pledge of allegiance to the flag. I had to teach him. How can we get the America back that I grew up in? It seems all lost now. The children worship drug addicted pop icons.
Kerwin: Have you been paying attention? She’s talking to High School students and what do you think she was talking about? It sure wasn’t religion or the benefits or working hard in our capitalist society. You appear to be intellectual but I would ask you to add to your intellect a pinch of common sense and a dash of survival instinct. She’s saying the same things Van Jones, Ayers,and the rest of the socialists are saying in case you didn’t notice. How about this? Anybody stupid enought to us a mass murdering political “takeover artist” in the same sentence as Mother Theresa is not fit to be hanging around the President and giving him advice on anything. Common sense dictates that she could have come up with some other leaders… like Martin Luther King (a Republican), George Washington, or many others that could have illustrated her point if she actually meant “strategy” as opposed to “philosophy”. She was doing what the rest of those idiots have done and are doing… softening our youth to the acceptance of socialism and socialist leaders. The Black Caucus comes back from Cuba and gives Castro a glowing review? We support an Hondurus dictator wannabe? Our FCC czar fawns over Chavez? I could go on and on. Do you think intellectuals didn’t exist prior to the implementation of dictatorships? They just “intellectualized” themselves into believing it couldn’t possibly be happening because it didn’t make any sense to thinking people. Wake UP!
“Only through radical conservative colored glasses does she look like a supporter of Mao. That stretch would break a fairly elastic rubber band.” [You're a moron - you have no clue what you're saying]
Mao Tse-tung: “Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.”
Dave B. and Ron Little,
I understand your concern but even military strategist will borrow from successful military commanders whose political agenda they are vehemently opposed to.
Mao was correct that “Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.” which is why the right to bear arms is such a grand idea.
Anita Dunn states she obtained the quote from Republican Lee Atwater.
If there is a better case against her then I am sure it will come out but this is not it despite our fears.
It’s amusing how the new liberal cliche’ refers to viewing the world through a specific kind of “glasses”. There’s conservative glasses, Jesus glasses, etc., however, liberals don’t need glasses since they see with such unindoctrinated clarity. The “so called intellectuals”, use confusing terms to justify their “idiotology”, through the use of confusing language. Don’t be fooled, the libs use glasses too, they’re just refered to as “spectacles”,(pun intended) you know, the kind of glasses with the kaleidoscope lenses.