ObamaCare And The “New Mommy Tax”
Yeah, yeah, I know I really shouldn’t call it ObamaCare, since, like virtually every other policy, Obama gives a speech then votes “present!” In this case, he has outsourced all the health system destruction legislation out to Congress. We’re still waiting for Obama’s actual plan, which he said weeks ago he would supply.
Anyhow, Amanda Carpenter let’s us know that the tampon tax has been replaced by the Mommy Tax
When Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus proposed taxing medical devices to raise $40 billion over the next 10 years for his health care plan, opponents started digging in and looking at what would be taxed. It turned out feminine products, like tampons, were classified as class I medical devices and thus, the “tampon tax” was born.
The backlash was quick and severe enough against the idea that the committee quickly drafted new language that would exempt those necessities from the tax, along with all other class I devices, like tongue depressors, and decided to only tax class II medical devices and higher that cost more than $100.
But, just wait for the revolt to start again because women will still pay a price under the new structure. Particularly new moms who want to use a powered breast pump to bottle milk for their babies. Those devices, labeled class II, typically retails for more than $100.
And, all the rest of the more expensive, higher-class medical devices used by both men and women — such as pacemakers, ventilators, X-ray machines, powered wheelchairs and surgical needles — will be taxed, too.
Ed Morrissey does the yeoman’s work in uncovering other medical devices that will be taxed, such as
- Dentures, both partial and full (Class VI) (will this include crowns and fillings?)
- Female condoms, single use (Class III)
- Treponemal syphilis test (Class IV) (well, maybe people should be careful regarding their sexual partners)
- HIV saliva test kit (Class IV) (ditto)
- Patient data storage and transmission software (Class VI) (and the tax will be passed straight to you, the patient)
- Stair-climbing wheelchair (Class III)
- Inflatable penis prosthetic (Class III) (I really do not want to print the joke that went through my mind)
- Hip, knee, ankle, breast prosthetics (Class III) (before a joke is made about breast implants, consider that many are used after mastectomies)
- Soft contact lenses, extended wear (Class III) (this would affect quite a few people, eh?)
- IUDs (Class III)
- Dialysis catheters (Class III)
- Dental X-rays (Class II)
- Sickle-cell anemia tests (Class II)
- Mammograms (Class II)
Doesn’t that sound great? The full list, thanks to Ed, is here.
How does this actually reduce your medical costs? If Big Government is hosing me on my contacts, and hosing my medical services providers on my medical records, sure seems like my costs will escalate.
But, then, that is one of the many problems with this whole plan. We have no idea what the costs actually are. Who is covered? What are the co-pays? What are the reimbursements? What are the deductibles? What are the premiums? In-network/out-of-network? Generic vs. name brand? Limitations? Out-of-pocket maximums? If the government denies your claim, who do you complain to and sue? When your company finds that it is cheaper to pay the fine rather than pay for your health insurance and drops their offering, you might be asking those same questions.
Crossed at Pirate’s Cove
Email This
Posted by William Teach on October 8, 2009 10:00 am
» Filed Under Anti-Americanism, Anti-Capitalism, Barack Obama, Congress, Democrats, Despotism, Fraud/misrepresentation, Government corruption, Government malfeasance/misfeasance, Healthcare, Nanny State, News, Senate, Social Engineering, Socialism, Taxes, Totalitarianism, U.S. Constitution, Unconstitutional, liberalism
Trackback URL:
Comments
2 Responses to “ObamaCare And The “New Mommy Tax””
-
-
-
Affiliations
The Giants
Advertise
-
-
Our Store
- Click the design to visit our store and help Stop the ACLU!
-
- More blogs about the ACLU
Syndicate Me
I have read the U.S. Constitution and it clearly states it is the job of Congress and not the President to legislate. If Congress cannot do that job without the President holding their hands then perhaps we need to do away with them and Just elect a dictator. I much prefer President Obama’s approach which is consistent with our system of governing unlike the one you suggest.
I think the Bacchus health care bill is oppressive in that it seems designed to raise the cost of medical care and private health insurance instead of controlling the cost curves as claimed.
The more I hear the more I believe the various United States governments are the major reason health care costs so much in the U.S. That certainly makes them look like the bad guys.