Abortion Addict Racks Up 15 Kills and Counting
Not all serial killers are wanted by the police. Self-described abortion addict Irene Vilar is free to kill and kill again with the active encouragement of authorities, who confiscate your money to help finance her homicidal activities.
Vilar has committed 15 abortions in 16 years. Here’s how ABC sees fit to report on her accomplishment, and on her attempt to exploit it for financial gain:
Irene Vilar worries that her self-described “abortion addiction” will be misunderstood, twisted by the pro-life movement to deny women the right to choose.
Her book, “Impossible Motherhood,” which will be released by Other Press on Oct. 6, chronicles her own dark choices: 15 abortions in 16 years, much of it as a married woman.
As press on the book has begun to leak out, Vilar — a literary agent and editor — says she has already sensed “an inkling of hatred.”
The poor victim.
I wonder if the butchers at Planned Parenthood give her every tenth abortion on the house. They definitely owe her a lifetime achievement award.
Hat tip: The Blogprof. Cross-posted at Moonbattery.
Email This
Posted by Van Helsing on September 22, 2009 3:18 pm
» Filed Under Abortion, Government corruption, Infanticide, Journalistic Prostitution, Liberal Media/Bias, Moral Relativism, News, Planned Parenthood, Psychology, Taxes
Trackback URL:
- The Greenroom » Forum Archive » Making Children Of Women pinged this post.
- Making Children Of Women : Pursuing Holiness pinged this post.
Comments
12 Responses to “Abortion Addict Racks Up 15 Kills and Counting”
-
-
-
Affiliations
The Giants
Advertise
-
-
Our Store
- Click the design to visit our store and help Stop the ACLU!
-
- More blogs about the ACLU
Syndicate Me
Maybe Obama will tap her for the Planned Parenthood Czar position, disgusting!
Wouldn’t you just hate to have her for a mother, though?
I am definitely pro-choice, but even I find this excessive. Is she using contraception? Has she considered getting her tubes tied? Has she heard of the morning-after pill?
Feel very sorry for her, for her “addiction” will cause her tremendous pain in the afterlife, where the consequences of such actions are unavoidable.
She is a twisted individual and needs to change her ways and do what is right before she obtains the destruction she well deserves.
She is twisting the fact that she has murdered 15 innocent children. Maybe, She will face up to her evil action one day.
I have my own evil actions to overcome.
“her self-described “abortion addiction” will be misunderstood, twisted by the pro-life movement to deny women the right to choose.”
I marvel at her ability to still sit in judgment on all of us horrible Christians and/or pro-lifers despite her obvious & admitted mental problems.
She is sickening! I am pro-Choice and I find her a sick excuse for a human being. If she didn’t want kids she could have used birth control (which she didn’t do) or had herself sterilized.
This book of hers is just another excuse for the liberal cry babies to cry: “It is not my fault! I was (insert blank excuse here)!”
Although only two, self-avowed, pro-choicers have condemned this woman in this thread, I hope to God that the vast, vast, vast majority of them are sickened by this monster’s actions.
Ummm, the woman, chose to not use birth control, waited to become pregnant, was afraid of the pregnancy and then had an abortion….16 times.
Many of them as a married woman.
The 17th time she was writing the book, did some soul searching and had a girl; had another one a few years later. I wonder what her children think….
In light of stories such as these, of individuals who appear to be so devoid of responsibility and character, why such liberal attention is given to a cause such as this.
I am constantly nagged by one question: if the right to abort or not abort lies in the hands of the woman, then should the right to financial support lie in the hands of the man? If a woman is indeed pregnant and reserves the right to continue or terminate the pregnancy, then it should follow that the man has the right to decide if he should provide financially for the child when born.
I believe this is a serious question, if the woman has the right to choose, then that same right ought to be extended to the man. Why should the man be subject to the choice of the woman if the right to choose is invoked?
Given I am pro-life and a proponent of the Constitution, and even though I am a UK citizen, I write:
I propose law be submitted to congress that the financial maintenance of offspring be the sole responsibility of the mother of any offspring manufactured by the actions of the mother with a prior pro creator. The basis of such a law is that the woman/mother had indeed been afforded the choice bestowed upon her, by common law, to either nullify the pregnancy or to bear child, with no permission granted for either state by the pro creator. Under such circumstances, the financial responsibility must lie with the female and therefore the rights of the pro creator are therefore nullified.
Death slut.