<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Obamacare Unconstitutional?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/08/22/is-obamacare-unconstitutional/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/08/22/is-obamacare-unconstitutional/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:53:29 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: L.D. Graystone</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/08/22/is-obamacare-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-134681</link>
		<dc:creator>L.D. Graystone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=26421#comment-134681</guid>
		<description>It is but a first step in a socialist agenda based upon the Cloward Piven Strategy to which Barack Hussein subcribes.  The end justifies the means.  Objective: scrap capitalism, free enterprise, private ownership, personal freedoms, and rebuild the USA into a socialist nation.  Remember the Union of Soviet Socialists Republic?  Well, welcome to the United Socialist States of America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is but a first step in a socialist agenda based upon the Cloward Piven Strategy to which Barack Hussein subcribes.  The end justifies the means.  Objective: scrap capitalism, free enterprise, private ownership, personal freedoms, and rebuild the USA into a socialist nation.  Remember the Union of Soviet Socialists Republic?  Well, welcome to the United Socialist States of America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Norton</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/08/22/is-obamacare-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-132103</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Norton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 05:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=26421#comment-132103</guid>
		<description>Forcing a person to buy something that they dont need or want in mob type activity. Our government has become a mob a long time ago and it&#039;s getting worse. Politicians can say whatever to get elected, and then are under no obligation whatsoever to do what they promised. This health care reform is a reform in favor of big business, not the people. If I am forced to buy from the mob in this way I will be looking for ways to settle my affairs and leave this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forcing a person to buy something that they dont need or want in mob type activity. Our government has become a mob a long time ago and it&#8217;s getting worse. Politicians can say whatever to get elected, and then are under no obligation whatsoever to do what they promised. This health care reform is a reform in favor of big business, not the people. If I am forced to buy from the mob in this way I will be looking for ways to settle my affairs and leave this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daryl Waite</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/08/22/is-obamacare-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-126647</link>
		<dc:creator>Daryl Waite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=26421#comment-126647</guid>
		<description>&quot;Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness&quot;.  Yes, requiring health insurance is as unconstitutional as requiring car or life insurance.  All this &quot;talk&quot; about the commerce amendment just side-steps the issue.

The unconstitutionality lies in the &quot;Freedom of Religion&quot;.  How can someone believe that they are &quot;Assured&quot; by GOD if they must be Insured by the &quot;State&quot;.  NO longer can they say they are in &quot;Good Hands&quot;  because they are in &quot;God&#039;s Hands&quot;  they must say that they are in &quot;Good Hands&quot; because they are in &quot;All-States&quot; hands.

An this is not ALL that&#039;s wrong.  Requiring &quot;car insurance&quot; shifts the burden of proof and destroys the presumption of innocense.  The state is not required to prove that a person does not have insurance, the person must prove that he does have &quot;financial responsibility&quot;.  This is TOTALLY against the constitution.

And, if anyone ever had their insurance &quot;lapse&quot; the insurance companies are &quot;required&quot; to be watch-dog snitches and tell the state - However they don&#039;t have to report someone purchasing insurance, so if a person just switches insurance companies, he must prove to the state that he was covered or be charged with a crime.

NO, NO, NO - The whole problem is that LAWS are to be based on what DID happen not what COULD happen....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness&#8221;.  Yes, requiring health insurance is as unconstitutional as requiring car or life insurance.  All this &#8220;talk&#8221; about the commerce amendment just side-steps the issue.</p>
<p>The unconstitutionality lies in the &#8220;Freedom of Religion&#8221;.  How can someone believe that they are &#8220;Assured&#8221; by GOD if they must be Insured by the &#8220;State&#8221;.  NO longer can they say they are in &#8220;Good Hands&#8221;  because they are in &#8220;God&#8217;s Hands&#8221;  they must say that they are in &#8220;Good Hands&#8221; because they are in &#8220;All-States&#8221; hands.</p>
<p>An this is not ALL that&#8217;s wrong.  Requiring &#8220;car insurance&#8221; shifts the burden of proof and destroys the presumption of innocense.  The state is not required to prove that a person does not have insurance, the person must prove that he does have &#8220;financial responsibility&#8221;.  This is TOTALLY against the constitution.</p>
<p>And, if anyone ever had their insurance &#8220;lapse&#8221; the insurance companies are &#8220;required&#8221; to be watch-dog snitches and tell the state &#8211; However they don&#8217;t have to report someone purchasing insurance, so if a person just switches insurance companies, he must prove to the state that he was covered or be charged with a crime.</p>
<p>NO, NO, NO &#8211; The whole problem is that LAWS are to be based on what DID happen not what COULD happen&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Edward</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/08/22/is-obamacare-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-124095</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 11:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=26421#comment-124095</guid>
		<description>PS: If you&#039;re concerned about individual rights, why &quot;stop the aclu&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS: If you&#8217;re concerned about individual rights, why &#8220;stop the aclu&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Edward</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/08/22/is-obamacare-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-124094</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 11:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=26421#comment-124094</guid>
		<description>The arguments about the provision being unconstitutional are bogus. They distort the law and the economic impact of the uninsured. http://dissentingjustice.blogspot.com/2009/08/is-healthcare-reform-unconstitutional.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The arguments about the provision being unconstitutional are bogus. They distort the law and the economic impact of the uninsured. <a href="http://dissentingjustice.blogspot.com/2009/08/is-healthcare-reform-unconstitutional.html" rel="nofollow">http://dissentingjustice.blogspot.com/2009/08/is-healthcare-reform-unconstitutional.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/08/22/is-obamacare-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-124040</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 02:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=26421#comment-124040</guid>
		<description>car insurance is state mandated which falls perfectly along the 9th amendment.
But if this reform bill is like Romneycare it&#039;s not mandated it will still leave 5% uncovered but those people are rich people who will face massive tax penalties.
I&#039;d need to see the part of the bill that addresses this to be sure. I&#039;m not exactly an expert I&#039;ve only read like half of it. If you got reference to that part of the bill i totally need to read up on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>car insurance is state mandated which falls perfectly along the 9th amendment.<br />
But if this reform bill is like Romneycare it&#8217;s not mandated it will still leave 5% uncovered but those people are rich people who will face massive tax penalties.<br />
I&#8217;d need to see the part of the bill that addresses this to be sure. I&#8217;m not exactly an expert I&#8217;ve only read like half of it. If you got reference to that part of the bill i totally need to read up on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Stephens</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/08/22/is-obamacare-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-124028</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Stephens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 00:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=26421#comment-124028</guid>
		<description>Car insurance is not federally mandated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Car insurance is not federally mandated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Daily Links II - 08/22/09 NoisyRoom.net: Where liberty dwells, there is my country&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/08/22/is-obamacare-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-124022</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Daily Links II - 08/22/09 NoisyRoom.net: Where liberty dwells, there is my country&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 23:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=26421#comment-124022</guid>
		<description>[...] Is Obamacare Unconstitutional? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is Obamacare Unconstitutional? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis D</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/08/22/is-obamacare-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-124015</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 23:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=26421#comment-124015</guid>
		<description>James
Thats unclear

Like Car Insurance, Health Coverage May Be Mandated
A Proposed Requirement That All Americans Have Policies Has Broad Support Among Reformers


By Ceci Connolly
Washington Post Staff Writer 
Wednesday, July 22, 2009</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James<br />
Thats unclear</p>
<p>Like Car Insurance, Health Coverage May Be Mandated<br />
A Proposed Requirement That All Americans Have Policies Has Broad Support Among Reformers</p>
<p>By Ceci Connolly<br />
Washington Post Staff Writer<br />
Wednesday, July 22, 2009</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis D</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/08/22/is-obamacare-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-124011</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 23:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=26421#comment-124011</guid>
		<description>It would certainly depend on the makeup of the court at the time. Lets all recall the Kelo case. I believe the liberals on the court decided &quot; Public Use&quot; also meant &quot; Public Good&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would certainly depend on the makeup of the court at the time. Lets all recall the Kelo case. I believe the liberals on the court decided &#8221; Public Use&#8221; also meant &#8221; Public Good&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
