Remember, Obama and the Mrs. are telling us that our doctors are performing amputations and tonsillectomies, just for the money. To them, and apparently to you, our current health care system is nothing but evil. I see it the other way around.

I do not turn down raises, however, who do you know, in a hospital, whose salary was tripled?

There are so many errors in information and assumptions presented as fact that it is hard to choose one, but having worked in health care for many years, I will address the issue of patient dumping. First, a person employed to foster “community relations” or “esternal affairs” would have no authority to set policy on the acceptance of patients. Regardless, the practice of sending stable patients to hospitals that accept the uninsured is widespread and is not, in and of itself, patient dumping. At any rate, I seriously doubt it is a policy implemented during Mrs. Obama’s tenure, but rather a long standing policy that has nothing to do with her. Do you think she demanded a raise or was offered a raise? If she demanded it I wonder why she wouldn’t have demanded more? When is the last time you turned down a raise?

I am increasingly disgusted by the riff-raff of America who can’t put together a legitimate discourse on whatever their true concerns are, so resort to this kind of “reporting” that simply highlights their ignorance and incompetence.

To go inactive, just because you no longer want to practice, Rule 756 is used.

(crickets)

There is NO SUCH THING as private, or sealed disciplinary actions. All actions taken by the board are public, and their determinations are public records…that’s why they have a website. Any action, be it big or small goes on the attorneys record and stays there. Here is an example of one from 1993

https://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=915614247

The record clearly statesd her status is “voluntary inactive”. How does one attain that status…there is only one way, you petion the court, and it issues an order. Here’s the law

(5) An attorney may advise the Administrator in writing that he or she desires to assume inactive status and, thereafter, register as an inactive status attorney. The annual registration fee for an inactive status attorney shall be $105. Upon such registration, the attorney shall be placed upon inactive status and shall no longer be eligible to practice law or hold himself or herself out as being authorized to practice law in this Sstate, except as is provided in paragraph (j) of this rule. An attorney who is on the master roll as an inactive status attorney may advise the Administrator in writing that he or she desires to resume the practice of law, and thereafter register as active upon payment of the registration fee required under this rule and submission of verification from the Director of MCLE that he or she has complied with MCLE requirements as set forth in Rule 790 et seq. If the attorney returns from inactive status after having paid the inactive status fee for the year, the attorney shall pay the difference between the inactive status registration fee and the registration fee required under paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(4) of this rule. Inactive status under this rule does not include inactive disability status as described in Rules 757 and 758. Any lawyer on inactive disability status is not required to pay an annual fee.

(7) An attorney who is on voluntary inactive status pursuant to former Rule 770 who wishes to register for any year after 1999 shall file a petition for restoration under Rule 759. If the petition is granted, the attorney shall advise the Administrator in writing whether he or she wishes to register as active, inactive or retired, and shall pay the fee required for that status for the year in which the restoration order is entered. Any such attorney who petitions for restoration after December 31, 2000, shall pay a sum equal to the annual registration fees that the attorney would have been required to pay for each full year after 1999 during which the attorney remained on Rule 770 inactive status without payment of a fee.

and an explanation of the process

Prior to November 1, 1999, former Supreme Court Rule 770 provided for a proceeding in the Court for any voluntary transfer to inactive status, whether because of some incapacitating condition or solely as a matter of the lawyer’s preference because the lawyer would not be practicing law.

The current registration rules provide a procedure for lawyers on Court-ordered inactive status under former Supreme Court Rule 770 who might wish to register. Whatever registration status the lawyer wishes to assume (active, inactive, or retired), the lawyer must first file a motion with the Supreme Court for restoration to active status under Rule 759. The motion process is necessary to screen for those who transferred due to circumstances that require some review of present fitness, and the motions will be contested only in such cases. In all other cases, the ARDC will consent to the transfer, and when a consent is submitted, the Supreme Court typically allows the motion within a few weeks of when it is filed.

Why would she change her liscence to inactive status?
In 1993, she gave up the practice of law and took a job as the CEO of a nonprofit…she never returned to practicing law.

This is hardly uncommon, many people give up practicing law and do something else, I am one of them.

So lets recap…

1. she petioned the court, and the court ordered that her status be changed to voluntary inactive. Thus she cannot practice law.

2. She has never been disciplined, the record clearly says “none” where any disciplinary proceedings or decisions would be noted.

3. Under the malpractice issurance line it says “no report required” because she has petioned the court, and the court has ordered, that she is no longer an active attorney.

And so the courts order attorneys not to practice law if they do not renew their registrations? you bet they do.

Supreme Court Rule 756 provides that on February 1 of each year, the ARDC must remove from the master roll the name of any lawyer who has not registered for that year. The rule also provides that any lawyer who practices law while not on the master roll engages in the unauthorized practice of law and may be held in contempt. ARDC sends a Final Registration Notice in January, warning unregistered attorneys that they will be removed from the master roll if they do not register. Shortly after the removal, ARDC sends notice of an attorney’s removal to the attorney and to the Chief Judges and Clerks of the circuit courts in which the removed attorney was registered.

If you have been removed from the master roll for failure to register, you can be reinstated by registering and paying the registration fee and any penalty due

I’s sorry pal. but if this is an example of your work, the only way you are going to stop the ACLU is if they become so weak with laughter at your feeble reasoning that they just fall over.

It says there was/is no PUBLIC discipline or proceedings against her — which means she could be under SEALED or PRIVATE discipline. It also says she’s voluntarily inactive UNDER COURT ORDER.

Unless Illinois courts order lawyers to quit practicing law EVERY TIME lawyers fail to renew licenses, and ONLY because they fail to renew licenses, how could you POSSIBLY KNOW that’s why she was ordered to become inactive?

And why would a lawyer fail to renew a license to practice law only 4 or 5 years after passing the bar exam, when the lawyer isn’t wealthy, isn’t birthing children, and isn’t moving out of the state? Common sense should tell you it doesn’t add up.

Perhaps your devotion to Obama and his communism has made YOU the blind, stupid one.

At the same time they were slashing Information Technology budgets and jobs.

I was an IT contractor there and my position wasn’t renewed.

If you are a patient there, better hope the computer system doesn’t crash, if it does, you better hope they know how to restore it.