Comments on: Hoyer: Few Would Vote for the Health Care Bill If They Actually Had to Read It http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/07/08/hoyer-few-would-vote-for-the-health-care-bill-if-they-actually-had-to-read-it/ Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:38:13 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: SpideyTerry http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/07/08/hoyer-few-would-vote-for-the-health-care-bill-if-they-actually-had-to-read-it/comment-page-1/#comment-120341 SpideyTerry Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:31:57 +0000 http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=24614#comment-120341 This is a Biden-esque gaffe. What's really scary is how truthful it is. This is a Biden-esque gaffe. What’s really scary is how truthful it is.

]]> By: Paul_In_Houston http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/07/08/hoyer-few-would-vote-for-the-health-care-bill-if-they-actually-had-to-read-it/comment-page-1/#comment-120335 Paul_In_Houston Thu, 09 Jul 2009 03:07:56 +0000 http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=24614#comment-120335 I'll credit them with a little bit of honesty, in that they don't even PRETEND to give a damn. - I’ll credit them with a little bit of honesty, in that they don’t even PRETEND to give a damn.

-

]]> By: Steven http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/07/08/hoyer-few-would-vote-for-the-health-care-bill-if-they-actually-had-to-read-it/comment-page-1/#comment-120334 Steven Thu, 09 Jul 2009 02:17:14 +0000 http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=24614#comment-120334 Never mind - I misread the headline myself!! Never mind – I misread the headline myself!!

]]> By: Steven http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/07/08/hoyer-few-would-vote-for-the-health-care-bill-if-they-actually-had-to-read-it/comment-page-1/#comment-120333 Steven Thu, 09 Jul 2009 02:16:42 +0000 http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=24614#comment-120333 Actually, this article's headline (and HotAir's as well) is misleading. What I understand Hoyer to say is that if senators waited to read the bill before voting on it, none would (because they wouldn't/couldn't/hadn't read it). Not that it's any better - he's saying congress-critters aren't interested in reading the bills... Actually, this article’s headline (and HotAir’s as well) is misleading.

What I understand Hoyer to say is that if senators waited to read the bill before voting on it, none would (because they wouldn’t/couldn’t/hadn’t read it).

Not that it’s any better – he’s saying congress-critters aren’t interested in reading the bills…

]]>