A Democracy or a Republic?
It’s been around for a while, but I never saw it. A pretty well informed little video for you:
Email This
Posted by Jay on June 23, 2009 9:35 pm
» Filed Under Constitution, News, Representative Government, Video
Trackback URL:
Comments
5 Responses to “A Democracy or a Republic?”
-
-
-
Affiliations
The Giants
Advertise
-
-
Our Store
- Click the design to visit our store and help Stop the ACLU!
-
- More blogs about the ACLU
Syndicate Me
Not bad. He makes an unjustified leap at the 1:56 mark, though. He further uses that leap to promote his own bias. I’m sympathetic towards his bias, but still… there’s no reason to tolerate intellectual dishonesty. Anyways, there’s no inherent correlation between the various forms of governments he describes and their positions on the Total Govt No Govt spectrum. I’m sure there are many examples of oligarchies that are less obtrusive France’s republic, for example.
Also, he did a complete slash & burn job on anarchy. There’s a colossal difference between the vacuum that occurs between governments and a society that deliberately phases out governmental institutions in favor of private institutions. It may be that human nature makes it impossible for such a thing to happen, but still… attack anarchy on its merits; strawmen deserve no place among honest men.
I expected, instead of stating no true monarchy existing, that he would redefine monarchy as an oligarchy with a very dominating individual at its head. I also expected him to state no true anarchy exists as well. I guess anarchy does exist for brief periods of time between certain transitions of power.
I’d say he’s basically correct re: monarchies and oligarchies; the distinction is basically meaningless.
Yes, anarchy has existed for brief periods, but that isn’t the kind of anarchy that any studied anarchist would advocate. Someone who actually advocates anarchism is advocating a society that hasn’t existed on a meaningful scale in recorded history. That’s not to say it’s impossible, though. The same could have been said about republics at one point in time, too.
Or perhaps utopia is possible too.
To the extent that More’s Utopia is equivalent to communism, it is impossible. There have been a number of high profile attempts to achieve that dream and they’ve all come up short.
The various forms of theoretical anarchy, on the other hand, run in the opposite direction. Our republic is among the closest experiments in that direction and even it falls way short of what anarchists would call a meaningful test case.