What If Moonbats Ran a War?

Posted on June 22, 2009

Moonbat insanity has now guaranteed that terrorists fighting our troops in Afghanistan will hide behind civilians:

The top U.S. general in Afghanistan will soon formally order U.S. and NATO forces to break away from fights with militants hiding in Afghan houses so the battles do not kill civilians, a U.S. official said Monday. …

Gen. Stanley McChrystal, who took command of international forces in Afghanistan this month, has said his measure of effectiveness will be the “number of Afghans shielded from violence,” and not the number of militants killed.

Maybe he got the idea from Chairman Zero measuring his economic performance by the fictional number of “jobs saved.”

McChrystal will issue orders within days saying troops may attack insurgents hiding in Afghan houses if the U.S. or NATO forces are in imminent danger and must return fire, said U.S. military spokesman Rear Adm. Greg Smith.

“But if there is a compound they’re taking fire from and they can remove themselves from the area safely, without any undue danger to the forces, then that’s the option they should take,” Smith said. “Because in these compounds we know there are often civilians kept captive by the Taliban.”

No doubt liberals will praise this enlightened policy, which will level the playing field by allowing Taliban terrorists to kill without fear of consequence, so long as they take cover behind the skirts of civilians.

On a tip from Franco. Cross-posted at Moonbattery.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

» Filed Under Middle East, News, Political Correctness, Politics As Usual, War On Terror, military, terrorism


Trackback URL

Comments

2 Responses to “What If Moonbats Ran a War?”

  1. Jenn on June 22nd, 2009 1:51 pm

    What’s new, they already hide behind civilians.

  2. SpideyTerry on June 22nd, 2009 9:45 pm

    Oh, for crying out loud. Look, the military should always take major steps to protect civilians. That’s a given. Still, this smacks of a major misstep and attempt to tie the troops’ hands. Weren’t issues with rules of engagement one of the complaints during the Bush years? Weren’t at least some of those issues resolved as part of the surge in Iraq?

    Why make things more difficult for the troops in combat? They have enough to worry about as it is. They certainly don’t have the option to take time off to go for ice cream.

Leave a Reply