Might Saturday’s Tenor Change Obama’s View On Iran?
Posted on June 21, 2009
You know, it’s not so much that Obama is on the wrong side of history, regarding Iran. He’s on no side of history. Even the BBC is getting rather cynical vis a vis Obama’s reticence to become engaged
The White House has so far resisted calls to speak out more forcefully in support of Iranian demonstrators and shelve plans for a dialogue with Iran’s leadership.
But as reports of violent clashes between demonstrators and the feared Basij paramilitary forces emerged from Tehran, US officials said that a large-scale crackdown would change the tenor of statements coming out Washington.
If the violence, killing, burning of things, arrests, etc, don’t get him off his behind, nothing will. Oh, except
President Barack Obama stands with daughters Malia Obama, 10, left, and Sasha Obama, 8, and orders frozen custard at The Dairy Godmother in the Del Ray area of Alexandria, Va., Saturday, June 20, 2009.
Well, that’s nice. But, see, there is a little problem. Things are happening in the world of importance, President Neophyte. Rather than a photo-op at the ice cream parlor (Patterico contrasts MSM tweets over this event vs. when an Iranian protester was shot dead), you might become a bit more engaged. You are The President now. Act like it.
Analysts and diplomats in the US have been exploring how President Barack Obama’s offer of engagement, combined with internal Iranian factors, may have contributed to the dynamic of events unfolding inside Iran.
In other words, like any good leftist, they are looking first to see if America was to blame. Which seems to be the opinion of Iran, as well, which blames the violence on Voice of America and the BBC.
Over the weekend, President Obama upped the ante ever so slightly as he warned Iran’s leaders that the world was watching.
Some folks thought Obama’s statement yesterday was fabulous!!!!, but, I thought it showed his neophyte status. Weird, agreeing with the BBC.
But, really, the BBC article seems to be pointing out that Obama wants negotiations with Iran too badly too make a strong statement. He wants his kumbaya, and doesn’t want to rock the boat. BushCo may have been belligerent (rightly so) against Iran, but, the British, French, UN, and other countries involved in talks about Iran’s nuclear aspirations weren’t. Look where it has gotten them.

I’ll repeat the question: if Iranian’s don’t want help from the world, then why do so many have English language signs? But, Obama will probably listen more to Ahmadinejad then anyone else, as he tells America and Britain to butt out. Notice how compassion and care for the downtrodden and those who want freedom disappears in the face of an ideological agenda?
Go Green!
![]()
BTW, some great Green emoticons here.
Crossed at Pirate’s Cove
» Filed Under Barack Obama, Foreign Policy, Iran, Middle East, News
Trackback URL
Comments
6 Responses to “Might Saturday’s Tenor Change Obama’s View On Iran?”
Leave a Reply

President Barack Obama stands with daughters Malia Obama, 10, left, and Sasha Obama, 8, and orders frozen custard at The Dairy Godmother in the Del Ray area of Alexandria, Va., Saturday, June 20, 2009.


























I agree with you that Obama’s reactions seem weak, and that it might make him look like he’s only interested in what Ahmadinejad has to say and so on. However, I think there’s a reason for this which you might not be aware of: Living in the region, i can tell you that an outspoken cheering for the “green revolution” in Iran will most probably be fatal to that. you see, if the west, and particularly the U.S. and Israel ( eg. the sworn enemies of Iran according to Ahmadinejad and khamenei), were to publicly support the current demonstrations, it would be seen by the Irani government as if the U.S. and Israel were behind this whole thing, they would tag it as such, and having tagged it as such, it would give them the “Holy” reason to obliterate, by force, the opposition. And you must know that when the Mullah (the supreme religious leader) sais his word, it is law. so according to that, the followers of the Mullahocracy (which are many many), would clash with the demonstrators, thus creating a nation-wide cycle of violence.
To make a long story short, I’d say keep it internal, because that’s their weak point! (as in all dictatorships)
Full support from lebanon for peace, justice, and democracy, in the whole world!
I completely understand what you are saying, Sami, and agree. I think what most of us want is for Obama to come out in stronger language for a proper election count, and for freedom.
But, you have given me some food for thought.
I associate myself with Sami, above.
Ahmadinejad is the main and immediate issue. His early departure would be just the first step in untying the knot in the Middle East. We must understand that Iranians want his ouster for reasons different than ours. (I am not especially hopefull.) With him gone, nuclear energy in Iran assumes a different profile.
The optimal official American position is on the sidelines. Our new president has started the rebuilding of United States’ moral and political leadership after its demise during the Busheney years. But we have not yet restored that credibility. President Obama is a mature student of statesmanship who understands that his grasp should not exceed the reach of American foreign policy.
But as Americans, we do not and should not remain on the sidelines. We need to demonstrate our active vigil and witness, together with the rest of the world, on a people to people basis. Technology permits and encourages that now, more than ever before.
Our False Prophet appears to have no idea what a golden opportunity he’s passing up… overthrow this evil regime without firing a single shot… get their Armageddon-inspired nuke program off the world stage… and free 30 million people all at one time.
But the boy wonder is too stupid to see it… or somehow just doesn’t care?
And isn’t this what George W Bush told you was going to happen in the Middle East in the wake of Iraq’s liberation?
Maybe that’s why Barack Obama has so little apparent interest in finishing the job in Iran… no matter how much it benefits the US and free world.
That, and the fact that he’s already piled all his chips on legitimizing this vile regime- a democratic revolution at this point would be embarrassing for our narcissist-in-chief.
http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com/
The President has his hands full in dealing with Iran as I point out in my latest photo-shop comment.
Most articles are written on this subject based on the premise that Obama actually wants to stop the Iranian regime….yet, he shows so much love & respect to hostile Muslim regimes that wish to obliterate Israel. Are we just pretending to not notice?