Even The A.M.A. Opposes ObamaCare
Posted on June 11, 2009
Other then grasshoppers, is there anyone who really wants the government providing health insurance?
As the health care debate heats up, the American Medical Association is letting Congress know that it will oppose creation of a government-sponsored insurance plan, which President Obama and many other Democrats see as an essential element of legislation to remake the health care system.
The opposition, which comes as Mr. Obama prepares to address the powerful doctors’ group on Monday in Chicago, could be a major hurdle for advocates of a public insurance plan. The A.M.A., with about 250,000 members, is America’s largest physician organization.
But in comments submitted to the Senate Finance Committee, the American Medical Association said: “The A.M.A. does not believe that creating a public health insurance option for non-disabled individuals under age 65 is the best way to expand health insurance coverage and lower costs. The introduction of a new public plan threatens to restrict patient choice by driving out private insurers, which currently provide coverage for nearly 70 percent of Americans.”
If private insurers are pushed out of the market, the group said, “the corresponding surge in public plan participation would likely lead to an explosion of costs that would need to be absorbed by taxpayers.”
Not the best of arguments, since that is exactly what Obama and the Democrats are aiming for.
If the doctors are too aggressive in fighting the public plan, they risk alienating Democrats whose support they need for legislation to increase their Medicare fees.
Right there is a huge difference in the belief systems between liberals/progressives and Republicans/Conservatives: those of us on the Right believe that government is supposed to be responsive to the People, and should listen to the People, vis a vis the 1st Amendment. The Left believes that Government is there to dictate to the People, so, better be careful in your protests and criticisms!
Robert Gibbs, the White House press secretary, said that in his address to the group next week, Mr. Obama would “outline the case for health care reform and make clear why we can’t afford to wait another year, or another administration, to bring down costs that are crushing families, businesses and government.”
Will Secretary Teleprompter give President Obama the words that tell us HOW this will bring down costs? So far, I have yet to see an argument on the how’s, even a lame one.
America’s Health Insurance Plans, a lobby for insurers, said Tuesday that the government plan proposed by some Senate Democrats could “dismantle employer-based coverage and significantly increase costs for those who remain in private coverage.”
OK, we can see the cost going up if ObamaCare passes, unless you let the inefficiency of government cover you.
Under a proposal favored by many Democrats, doctors who take Medicare patients would also have to participate in the new public plan. Democrats say that requirement is needed to make sure the public plan can go into business right away with a large network of doctors.
And right there is a good argument. Doctors are already streaming away from Medicare and Medicaid, due to the pitiful payouts and enormous government red tape. It is exceedingly becoming more and more difficult for doctors to get paid, and, often, they lose money. Many of them provide the service because they want to help those who cannot afford the services, very noble. But, if they are going to be forced to deal with more and more government, having them dictate patients and practices, guess what? A good chunk of qualified and competent doctors will drop Medicaid altogether, and the lower quality ones, looking simply to gain government $$$, will be left in the program.
Crossed at Pirate’s Cove
» Filed Under 1st Amendment, Abortion, Anti-Americanism, Anti-Capitalism, Barack Obama, Cloning, Constitution, Democrats, Dems In Charge: Now What?, Embryonic Stem Cells, Eugenics, Euthanasia, Fascism, Healthcare, Infanticide, Marxism, Medical Malpractice/ethics, Nanny State, News, Socialism, States Rights, Taxes, Totalitarianism, Unconstitutional, Welfare, liberalism
Trackback URL
Comments
5 Responses to “Even The A.M.A. Opposes ObamaCare”
Leave a Reply
where exactly is the health care crisis? they make it sound like they have to cart away the dead like during the black death?
the uninsured have access to medical care via emergency rooms and sliding scale systems available in hospital clinics. there are also huge portions of the uninsured that don’t want to buy insurance- why should i be forced to pay for that?
I am in total agreement with you, Ruby. Great point.
We must oppose this with every thing within us. Ever watched the A&E show, Intervention? Seen that destructive behavior? The stds from 500+ sexual partners and IV drug usage? We will be paying for this and those individuals will feel even less shame for their actions when healthcare is a RIGHT, not something we seek to avoid by good health management and self control. This is a nightmare.
The AMA is FINALLY saying what should have been shouted before the election – nationalized healthcare is the ruin of private practice doctors!! I am so fuming mad that it took them until now to speak up. I wonder how many of these AMA doctors voted for The One – from my circle of friends it was A LOT. You reap what you sow.
“…threatens to restrict patient choice by driving out private insurers, which currently provide coverage for nearly 70 percent of Americans.”
Well, whoop-de-doo!! “Nearly” 70% covered. Which means more than 30% not covered. “Patient choice” is, of course, code for “our fess will go down”. If you have full coverage and can afford to pay through the nose for it, or make sure your job has it, and make sure not to get laid off, and make sure not to have a “pre-existing condition”, or don’t develop a chronic condition which will have your insurance company examining you through an electron microscope to figure out how to cancel you, than private health insurance is great.
If you just want decent, basic health care for all, then universal health coverage is infinitely superior. I know, I have lived in Canada and New Zealand, and the American “health care system” is a tragic joke.
Bottom line is those of paying for health insurance are paying 20 times more than in the past 10 years and health care quality is no better for it. I have seen a Doctors office charge me directly for a test then turn around and bill the insurance company 5 times more than what they billed me directly. That’s the Doctors office. Also about 60% of medical employees filing claims get it wrong most of the time. Then there’s the insurance companies themselves with deliberate red tape and consistently dragging their heels. Yeah, the whole process needs reformed.