Holder Looks To Invent Charges Against Tiller Killer
So, let’s see: Attorney General Holder forces the dropping of all chargesagainst folks that were stone cold busted for violating the Voting Rights Act, but, is going to invent charges against abortion doctor George Tiller’s murderer, Scott Roeder
The U.S. Justice Department said on Friday it is launching an investigation into the murder of Kansas abortion provider George Tiller, who had been reviled by anti-abortion groups.
The Justice Department said it would investigate whether Tiller’s murder violated a 1994 U.S. law that establishes penalties for those who block access to abortion services.
Huh? Roeder is already stone cold busted and being charged with murder in Kansas, but, Los Federales want to get involved in any way they can. I’m not quite sure how it can be considered “blocking access for abortion services” – notice the in-Justice Department rarely ever does anything about liberals who block access to areas, such as when unions are striking – but they are sure going to try to get their hands on Roeder.
After the shooting, Attorney General Eric Holder directed agents to protect other abortion facilities.
Hmm, I don’t remember Holder directing agents to protect people who worked for companies like AIG and Citi back a few months ago who were getting death threats, not to mention threats from sitting elected officials like Barney Frank and Andrew Cuomo. Over to the DU
annabanana Glad to hear it. This was no “lone wacko”. This guy was working for those who are willing to kill to impose their religious beliefs on others.
Funny how liberals weren’t so bothered by casually discussing death for people who got their legally entitled bonuses while working for companies that took bailout money (doesn’t mean I like that they got bonuses, but, the law is the law.)
Ocracoker16 Unfortunate that someone has to die in order to get an investigation by the DOJ. I hope that this investigation helps them to see that there are plenty of highly dangerous groups out there that are producing murderers like Scott Roeder. It shouldn’t take very long for them to figure out that the murder of Dr. Tiller wasn’t an isolated event.
Really? There have been 6 abortionists murdered since Roe v. Wade was ruled on, including Tiller. There have been other attempts, assaults, and property damage. There has been more violence perpetrated by ultra-left wing Environmental Liberation Front (not to mention other left wing groups) then any anti-abortionists. Heck, President Obama’s buddy William Ayers was part of a group that rioted, blew things up, smashed property, firebombed, etc, which resulted in hundreds of injuries, including to police officers. The only reason the Weather Underground had a tiny death count was incompetence. Cause they sure tried.
Email This
Posted by William Teach on June 5, 2009 6:18 pm
» Filed Under Abortion, Barack Obama, Hypocrisy/Situational Ethics, News, Politics As Usual, State Sovereignty
Trackback URL:
Comments
6 Responses to “Holder Looks To Invent Charges Against Tiller Killer”
-
-
-
Affiliations
The Giants
Advertise
-
-
Our Store
- Click the design to visit our store and help Stop the ACLU!
-
- More blogs about the ACLU
Syndicate Me
Just a disclaimer. I write for ViewPoints.com under the screen persona of AnnaBanana. That is a screen name I use ONLY for ViewPoints.com. I didn’t write the comment published above in this article.
WT Said:
> I’m not quite sure how it can be considered > “blocking access for abortion services”
You seem very passionate about this. Maybe you should try to find out.
Good to know, Anne. No worries, I have seen that annabanana at the DU for a long time.
Well, that is for Holder to declare, Decidenator, since he seems hell bent on involving the feds.
Maybe it’s blocking access because now there is one less provider of a procedure not many are willing to perform, removing a potentially viable fetus from its mother with the intent of terminating its life.
Ah, the old “ex-girlfriend-and/or-ex-wife” investigative technique. Tried and true. Yeah that’ll get you solid and objective forensic evidence (re: CNN — “Alleged shooter’s ex-wife: He was capable of murder”).
Really? Whoever wrote this “article” is a hack. These arguments are devoid of anything remotely intelligent. Lets debunk.
Voting rights act and the targeted murder of a person based on his beliefs (hate crime). Yes those are comparable cases, in that.. what? you write about both of them? there is no resemblance between them. Might as well compare apples and earwax.
Protecting AIG and clinics.. let me ask you this. Did anyone from AIG get gunned down in a church? No? Huh, thats weird, death threats are obviously the same thing as murder and should be treated as such. Right?
Liberals are dumb for objecting to the killing of a doctor. How on earth do you justify this argument? Seriously. How is it that you can, with a straight face, say talking about killing and actually killing someone is the same thing? Are you so deranged that you don’t see the huge difference there?
Since you use the term “liberal” so scathingly, I can only assume you consider yourself a conservative. I wonder when “conservatives” started thinking murder, in any instance, is justified. Laws apply only when you agree with them? is that it? The ELF and other extremist organisations are just that. EXTREMIST. ultra-left, ultra-right.. they don’t speak for me, nor should they for you. The constant left vs right on all these issues sickens me. Murder isn’t politically motivated