What Say To Homosexual Indoctrination? Of 5 Year Olds?

Posted on May 18, 2009

They said if George Bush Barack Obama was elected president, sex ed would be taught at the kindergarten level. And they were right

A California school district seems intent on teaching pre-school children to accept the homosexual lifestyle.

The Alameda Unified School District announced it was considering a supplemental curriculum to eradicate “homophobia” in kindergarten children. Brad Dacus, founder of the Pacific Justice Institute (PJI), said the meeting room for the public session earlier this week was overcrowded with angry parents.

“Nowhere at anytime did it give any protection for children being bullied because of their faith, their religion, their size, their race, ethnicity,” he points out. “It is only going to give this special anti-bullying protection for homosexuals and transsexuals.”

As the story points out, this is pure indoctrination, parents rights are being virtually done away with, and, to top it all off

Parents cannot opt out their children from the curriculum.

So, 5 year olds, who still think pooping their pants is funny, are going to be taught about homosexual lifestyles. Great. Look, I don’t have a problem with homosexuals, this is America, and if people are gay, fine, that’s their business. As long as they do not make it mine. But this is liberalism gone insane.

In a related post, The Other McCainpoints out that the Girl Scouts are now going to be teaching about feminism, communism, and, wait for it…..lesbian role models. “Future Femi-Nazis of America!”

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

» Filed Under 1st Amendment, Child Exploitation, Communism, Dems In Charge: Now What?, Education, Homosexual Agenda, Homosexual Fascism, Indoctrination, Liberal World, Nanny State, News, Parenting, Political Correctness, Propaganda, Social Engineering, Unconstitutional, feminism


Trackback URL

Comments

14 Responses to “What Say To Homosexual Indoctrination? Of 5 Year Olds?”

  1. snaggletoothie on May 18th, 2009 10:33 pm

    Yeah. When I was five years old we were always beating up the five year old gays. Yeah, for sure.
    I guess the real question here is: do the jerks running this school know anything about human development? Or are they a bunch of those anti-science Democrats?

  2. don on May 18th, 2009 11:15 pm

    fine, your kid doesn’t get exposed to the concept that people can be different. and you can indoctrinate your little thugs. I just want you to post a $1,000,000 bond so that the taxpayers don’t have to cover the costs when your little precious tyke and his friends decide to have fun night out gay bashing.

  3. James on May 18th, 2009 11:43 pm

    This is clearly unconstitutional. If parents are not allowed to keep their children out of school for pro-homosexual lessons, then I say that the Jehovah’s Witness student should be forced to put his/her hand over their hearts and pledge to the flag or receive a failing mark for the day. If they ever do this, then I’ll accept that my child should sit through one of these lectures.

  4. William Smyth on May 19th, 2009 2:45 am

    The proposed curriculum is posted on the school district web site. There isn’t any mention of homosexuality in the kindergarten lesson plan. The lesson plans for 1rst through 3rd grade acknowledge the existence of diverse family structures. It isn’t until 4th and 5th grade that any sexual aspects are introduced and even then it is done in a pretty superficial way.

  5. snaggletoothie on May 19th, 2009 5:45 am

    I think the time to move all this PC crap into the curriculum would be after they have some success at teaching reading, writing and arithmetic.
    Don, you might dial down the hate a little. I probably don’t want advice on acceptance and tolerance from someone who calls my kids thugs based on nothing but his own hate and anger gone wild. Apparently the anonymity of the net brings out the worst in you. Step away from the keyboard.

  6. don on May 19th, 2009 1:22 pm

    snaggletoothie

    you are right the anonymity of the web does bring out the worst in many of us. am i angry yeah i am, and i long to have reasonable conversations, but most commentators on the web are only interested in slogans. so i end up throwing some too. would be nice to tone down the volume on all sides and try to see if there is a way, but really on a site called stop the aclu? like all organizations the aclu has done some pretty stupid stuff, but its core mission is to protect the bill of rights. sounds like a good idea to me. perhaps this site and its members might consider how to achieve that objective, even when there are others who join the aclu with other objectives.
    ****************************

    …but its core mission is to protect the bill of rights.

    The Bill of Rights include the 2nd Amendment, Don.

    Give us an example of the ACLU correctly understanding, interpreting (which is not under their purview) and representing the 2nd Amendment.

    Lobo

  7. Mack on May 19th, 2009 4:43 pm

    When the gays move their sick perversion from the bedroom to the classroom!
    It’s time to pull your children out of school!

    Personally, I don’t give a rats (Bleep) what those degenerate sick scum does!

    But, when it comes to our children I do care, just like the atheist and homosexual mafia don’t want Christianity in school influencing the children.

    Christians don’t want the secularist indorsing and promoting the homosexual lifestyle in school and influencing our children.

  8. snaggletoothie on May 19th, 2009 8:09 pm

    Really. step away from the keyboard. You half a** admit to the hate but you fail to apologize for your libelous attack. You want to justify your hate speech by the fact that you don’t like some words at the top of the page? No, I need advice on acceptance, tolerance and civil rights from an anger junkie. And if your holier than thou little rationalization machine of a twisted personality doesn’t like the words at the top of the page, move on to another page.

  9. Granny on May 19th, 2009 9:11 pm

    This is not actually anything new. A couple of years back a father in Lexington, Massachusetts, was banned from school property and prosecuted for objecting to just such indoctrination of his kindergartener.
    http://www.article8.org/docs/news_events/parker/main.htm

  10. William Smyth on May 20th, 2009 1:45 am

    Vocabulary words introduced for kindergarteners.

    Name calling
    Exclude
    Hurtful
    Teasing
    Different
    Similar
    Comfortable

    Which of these words do you find objectionable?

    The book used is about a new kid in a class with a pet iguana.

  11. snaggletoothie on May 20th, 2009 3:52 am

    None of that social engineering nonsense belongs in a school establishment that is going backwards in terms of effectively teaching academic basic. It is a waste of resources.

  12. T on May 21st, 2009 4:19 pm

    “fine, your kid doesn’t get exposed to the concept that people can be different. and you can indoctrinate your little thugs. I just want you to post a $1,000,000 bond so that the taxpayers don’t have to cover the costs when your little precious tyke and his friends decide to have fun night out gay bashing.”

    Nice strawman. Please come back when you have a coherent argument, not some spittle-spraying rant.

  13. mizclark on May 21st, 2009 10:52 pm

    It would seem to me Arnold has more power in the state of California than Obama. I do believe he is Republican! Can’t put that one on the president.

  14. Ratgirl on August 10th, 2009 8:41 pm

    “George Bush Barack Obama”– WHAAAT!?

Leave a Reply