Some consistency by them on this issue would just be terrific.

Consider equal protection under the law. If a mother were to kill her boyfriend’s child because her boyfriend raped her then “would she be prosecuted for murder if the child was not in her womb?”

So the question becomes in what cases is homicide justified and that rule should apply whenever the victim is human, no matter what their location whether in out of his/her mother’s womb.

From NewsBusters, we get a nice list of things Obama has done for the unborn.

January 23, 2009 – Forces taxpayers to fund pro-abortion groups that either promote or perform abortions in other nations. Decison to overturn Mexico City Policy sends…

Really.

The “pro-choice” movement does not allow for an actual choice: When abortion is the only option offered to many, there is really nothing to “choose” from, is there? Women today choosing to keep a pregnancy are stigmatized in much the same way they were in the past for conceiving out of wedlock, perhaps even more so and in a more aggressive and hostile manner. They are called greedy and selfish and worse. Look at how the Duggars are treated – and they don’t even subsidize their family with welfare dollars, on the taxpayers’ dole.

And don’t even get me started on the Roe and Doe arguments. They were taken WAY beyond and abused outside of any scope the court intended, not to mention the fact that “Roe” was herself disgusted at how her case was manipulated by the “pro-choice” movement and actively campaigned herself to get it overturned. How’s THAT for irony?