The Domestic Extremism Lexicon
In case you’re wondering how the Department of Homeland Security spends the mountains of tax money shoveled into it — since our rulers clearly have no interest in defending the border or inconveniencing Islamic terrorists — have a look at the new supplement to the Newspeak dictionary entitled the Domestic Extremism Lexicon. This document is a useful accompaniment to Crappy Nappy Napolitano’s study on the potential terror threat of anyone whose views fall to the right of Sean Penn’s, and indispensible to aspiring apparatchiks who want to improve their vocabularies. A few sample terms:
alternative media: A term used to describe various information sources that provide a forum for interpretations of events and issues that differ radically from those presented in mass media products and outlets.
Simply by listening to talk radio or reading Stop the ACLU, you too could be taking part in domestic extremism. No wonder the government abandoned the War on Terror to focus on this far more prevalent threat.
antiabortion extremism: A movement of groups or individuals who are virulently antiabortion and advocate violence against providers of abortion-related services, their employees, and their facilities. Some cite various racist and anti-Semitic beliefs to justify their criminal activities.
I’ll bet you didn’t know that opposition to abortion is anti-Semitic. You see how much our wise government can teach us?
anti-immigration extremism: A movement of groups or individuals who are vehemently opposed to illegal immigration, particularly along the U.S. southwest border with Mexico, and who have been known to advocate or engage in criminal activity and plot acts of violence and terrorism to advance their extremist goals.
There follows a long list of examples. Just kidding; no examples exist.
This one is really scary:
patriot movement: A term used by rightwing extremists to link their beliefs to those commonly associated with the American Revolution.
Over 1 million of these fiends openly paraded their right-wing views just last Tax Day. Good thing Jane-O is here to protect the public with her various documents.
On a tip from Heather M. Cross-posted at Moonbattery.
Email This
Posted by Van Helsing on May 4, 2009 1:16 pm
» Filed Under 1st Amendment, 2nd Amendment, Abortion, Anti-Americanism, Border Control/Homeland Security, Communism, Conservatism, Democrats, Domestic Enemies, Fascism, Hypocrisy/Situational Ethics, Internet, News, Politics As Usual, Propaganda, Racism, Revisionism, Tea Party/Protests, Viewpoint discrimination, liberalism
Trackback URL:
Comments
12 Responses to “The Domestic Extremism Lexicon”
-
-
-
Affiliations
The Giants
Advertise
-
-
Our Store
- Click the design to visit our store and help Stop the ACLU!
-
- More blogs about the ACLU
Syndicate Me
This is all made possible by the level of Obama worship that our media has helped develop. The cultists who follow Obama’s every move are embarrassing to themselves. They can’t independently think rationally about the long term impact of proposals – they just go along because He says it will create a more fair and just society.
Obama worship must be fought on the ground by conservatives using humor and fact. For a bit of humor and a 12-step plan to deal with recovering Obama worshipers, you might hit:
http://firstconservative.com/blog/top-ten/12-step-recovery-plan-for-obama-supporters
Readers might also like to see my Nolan Chart column on the lexicon:
http://www.nolanchart.com/article6375.html
Let’s hope you never need the ACLU or anyone like us to defend your freedom of speech. The difference between you and us is that we WOULD defend your freedom of speech just so you can slam us.
The ACLU only defends LIBERAL ideals, not those of the vast majority of Americans.
The ACLU helped Limbaugh with his legal woes a couple years ago, so they don’t just help lefties (try to not respond is such an extreme way… leave that to the establishment media). BUT, if I needed legal help I’d go HIRE a lawyer, i do not need bureaucratic group-think lawyers “helping” me. The good ole’ free market lawyers work just fine.
In response to Brandon Brown: The pitiful truth is that the ACLU almost NEVER defends or represents conservative positions, so it’s kind of a moot point, yes?
The DHS Lexicon On Domestic Estremeism:
Anyone who thinks that this lexicon has been purged from DHS files, as claimed now by that department, is kidding themselves. This lexicon is the first step toward identifying what they consider enemies of the state by definition. It is an initial assault to suppress on free speech and a plan of harassment of anyone who does not agree with:
1.Open U.S. Borders
2. Amnesty for all illegal aliens in the U.S.
3. NAFTA and one world government.
4. Global Governance as recently referred to by Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton.
5. Surrender of our national sovereignty as required in order to achieve No. 4, above.
6. Making English our national language and discontinuing the destructive effects of bilingual education.
7. A patriot, returning from foreign military service who believes that they have a right to a job.
If you believe in any of these and are critical of the Government’s policies in reference to them, then you are an extremist as defined by Janet Napolitian’s Lexicon on Domestic Extremism.
Why was this Domestic Extremism Lexicon created? Did we borrow it from General Pinochet’s rule in Argentina? What civil war does the DHS wish to start? Are we all subversives? Did McCarthy coin the title? How can we be a nation with freedom of speech and freedom to aggregate and then have our tax dollars fund reports/dictionaries/terms/legalese for “subversives?” Obama should crush this report and have Janet retire ASAP and put someone in charge who actually wishes to honor our constitution and Bill of Rights.
It looks like a simple list of terms to me. I think the retard who wrote this article and most of the mainstream media is taking this WAY too seriously.
Some groups in ANY ideology have the potential to become violent. If you argue that point you are a fool.
Any ideology has the potential to produce extremists. That’s all I see written there.
WE need to take this serious.
His Magesty Obama and all the kings men will squeeze all they can out of the serfs if the average joe doesn’t stand up and say enough. I think there are more people in the good old US of A that are extremist that are not. Open your mind and look at what is going on. That is if you are capable of opening your mind.
first they told us who not to listen to on the radio, now what words we cannot use, and next it’s going to be what books we shouldn’t read and what clothes we should wear…. it’s all about CONTROLLING US. Enuf!
Before they tell what not to read, I am suggesting we all read 1984 by George Orwell. “BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU”