Children Taken From Grandparents for Homosexual Adoption
Posted on January 29, 2009
Britain is always a good place to look if you want to see what it will mean for our society that liberal government is becoming alarmingly more powerful. The latest outrage — children denied to their grandparents are turned over by the State to a pair of homosexuals to be raised in an atmosphere of depravity:
The devastated grandparents were told they would never see the youngsters again unless they dropped their opposition.
The couple, who cannot be named, wanted to give the five-year-old boy and his four-year-old sister a loving home themselves. But they were ruled to be too old — at 46 and 59.
The relatively young grandparents have fought for years for the right to raise the kids, but finally knuckled under to the Leviathan “after they faced being financially crippled by legal bills.” The government doesn’t have a problem with legal bills; it just passes them on to the taxpayers it rapes.
There were several other heterosexual couples who wanted to raise the children, but bureaucrats didn’t want to pass up this opportunity to engage in social engineering by having the kids raised in a grotesque parody of a family. Meanwhile, mom is too busy shooting heroin to worry about it. There was no mention of a dad. This is society on moonbattery.
On a tip from Jay Guevara. Cross-posted at Moonbattery.
» Filed Under Europe, Homosexual Agenda, News
Trackback URL
Comments
9 Responses to “Children Taken From Grandparents for Homosexual Adoption”
Leave a Reply
Please divulge the full story. The child was taken away from his drug addict mother and the grandparents have deteriorating health and financial problems causing them to be unfit to raise children. And please don’t print a story such as this and then have the audacity to say something along the lines of “protecting traditional marriage” or claim that any action you make against the GLBT community is not “based on hate.” Being a Christian is just as much of a choice as “choosing” to be gay and “choosing” to give an impoverished child a loving home.
Angina (grandfather) and diabetes (grandmother) are deteriorating health problems that preclude caring for children? And it looks like the financial problems came from fighting to keep their grandkids.
Who are you, Jason, that you can decide that they are “unfit” to raise their grandchildren? What right has the government to make such a ruling?
Jason Nelson, you adopt the same rhetorical attitude as your homosexual “comrades” do. You always try to get the debate emotional and then accuse everyone of bigotry or homophobia. The truth of the matter is that these children were taken away from their grandparents who were capable to look after them, and were fighting legal battles to get the children back. Children themselves are crying to stay with grandparents. So, we have both sides wanting to live together. Their mother, who is struggling with drug-addiction, asked authorities if children are not given to grandparents, then to put them with a male and a female. There were many couples who wanted the children, apart from the fact that their own grandparents were perfectly capable to look after the children!!! And yet, the corrupted authority decided to give them to a homosexual household in order to adhere to the filthy dogma. This is disgrace! This case must be told to the entire world to stop this politically correct “liberal” non-sense.
Read some of the UK papers and you will discover that the grandparents already have kids to raise and felt unable to raise their grandchildren as well.They were fine with the idea of adoption until they found out it was a gay couple!What hypocrisy !!!
Grandparents have every right to oppose gay adoption for their grandchildren. They love these grandchildren but don’t have the money to raise them. So they considered adoption. No one in their right mind would want to be raised by gays. It is worse than having a drug addicted parent. They are sexual deviants with terrible psychological problems.
Eurotrash showing its true colors and base morals. Gays are better than straights to raise children in Britan? What a disgrace. and bunch of losers the Brits have become.
The British government has succeeded in social engineering the British out of Britain with its forced adoption and immigration policies.
How do you expect a socially engineered ethnic brit who doesn’t value their own blood ties because they have been ripped from their own family by the government to be raised preferably by gays, to believe that all are equal with the gay lifestyle being more equal and entitled to get along with immigrants who believe that blood family and tribe are everything?
What you will get is full scale social warfare where the immigrants will be feared and left alone whilst the ethnic brits are further preyed upon by the social engineers trying to stuff further and further abnormalities down their throats as nothing more then another version of normality.
Ask yourselves how many muslim kids have been adopted by gays to date?
Those ethnic brits with enough money and brains should grab their kids while they can and run.
I’m not entirely surprised this article left out a couple of things.
The 59-year-old grandfather, who has seven children of his own, told the Daily Telegraph: “There is no way we’d have allowed the children to be adopted if we’d known they were going to a gay couple.
(Quote from the Daily telegraph website)
Perhaps unsurprisingly, the The Roman Catholic Church in Scotland said the decision was “devastating” and would have a serious impact on the welfare of the children.
A spokesman added: “There is an overwhelming body of evidence showing that same-sex relationships are inherently unstable and reduce the life expectancy of those involved. (Of course, there still isn’t any evidence for this)
In response to my previous post, I am not, in fact, on either side. Though I would like to note that the age of the couple did concern me, because when the children are in their teens, the grandparents will almost be in there 60’s. And looking after teens at that age isn’t exactly going to be easy. Plus, with that many people in the house already, how could they expect to pay for everything that two children will need? That was my common sense speaking, there. Oh, and my mother’s.
On a side note, I do think the children’s services were, in this case, much too brutal.
I just hope they’re (the children) provided with a loving home.
Btw, does anybody know if the grandparents were going to allow the mother back into the children’s lives?