<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: British Nanny State Could Implement Website Ratings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/12/27/british-nanny-state-could-implement-website-ratings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/12/27/british-nanny-state-could-implement-website-ratings/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:01:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: British Culture Secretary Andy Burnham wants to filter your internet.</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/12/27/british-nanny-state-could-implement-website-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-110811</link>
		<dc:creator>British Culture Secretary Andy Burnham wants to filter your internet.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 09:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=18507#comment-110811</guid>
		<description>[...] British Nanny State Could Implement Website Ratings Stop the ACLU, PA - 27 Dec 2008 In an interview with The Daily Telegraph, Mr Burnham said “clearer standards” were needed as to what could be displayed online. &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] British Nanny State Could Implement Website Ratings Stop the ACLU, PA &#8211; 27 Dec 2008 In an interview with The Daily Telegraph, Mr Burnham said “clearer standards” were needed as to what could be displayed online. &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HipHopLawer</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/12/27/british-nanny-state-could-implement-website-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-110764</link>
		<dc:creator>HipHopLawer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 02:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=18507#comment-110764</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a question for ya:  what position would the ACLU take on this issue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a question for ya:  what position would the ACLU take on this issue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/12/27/british-nanny-state-could-implement-website-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-110735</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 05:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=18507#comment-110735</guid>
		<description>This is one of those things that lefties might be able to convince the public is a good thing at first, but not for too long. Keeping young children from running into adults sites is a good thing, but it is the parents&#039; job, not Uncle Sam&#039;s. I don&#039;t want the Obamessiah deciding that images of 9/11 or other historical events are &#039;unacceptable.&#039; Parents should do whatever it takes to keep their kids from going on sites that they don&#039;t approve of. More importantly, I don&#039;t want any &#039;international rules&#039; deciding what &#039;should not be available to anyone.&#039; Beheadings are awful, but if everything violent posted by these monsters was instantly removed, people would never see their true colors. If the American people put up with this crap, than what good is the first amendment anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of those things that lefties might be able to convince the public is a good thing at first, but not for too long. Keeping young children from running into adults sites is a good thing, but it is the parents&#8217; job, not Uncle Sam&#8217;s. I don&#8217;t want the Obamessiah deciding that images of 9/11 or other historical events are &#8216;unacceptable.&#8217; Parents should do whatever it takes to keep their kids from going on sites that they don&#8217;t approve of. More importantly, I don&#8217;t want any &#8216;international rules&#8217; deciding what &#8217;should not be available to anyone.&#8217; Beheadings are awful, but if everything violent posted by these monsters was instantly removed, people would never see their true colors. If the American people put up with this crap, than what good is the first amendment anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

