Comments on: Global Warming? Not So Serious, Says IPCC Chairman

By: I don't drink the koolaid

I don't drink the koolaid — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:40:20 +0000

Hey Archimedes,

You keep drinking the kool-aid. Junk Science, are you kidding me?!?! You probably still believe in the bogus Hockey Stick graph don’t you. You also use the Farmer’s Almanac to plan next year’s vacation. Climate modeling is a joke! A meterologist can’t predict what’s going to happen next week let alone in the next 100 years. Garbage in, garbage out is what your hanging your hat on. Just stick to imperical data shall we. The earth has been alot hotter than it is now, that is a fact. Try not to hang your hat on modeling, it’s bogus!

By: Archimedes

Archimedes — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 03:48:00 +0000

Weird twisting of otherwise publicly available information to fit political purposes. How very typical of warming deniers. Anything to erode measures that might make humans less impactful on the planet. To see the biggest climate dodo birds, just follow the media ad money back to coal, oil, nuclear — who fund the denial machine. The public can not be fooled as easily now, but repetition of bunk and junk science no matter how much $$ changes hands.

By: William Teach

William Teach — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 02:05:53 +0000

What context? There’s the story. First he said one thing, then proved that it was all about control.

By: columbus

columbus — Thu, 11 Dec 2008 21:33:54 +0000

“Now he has warned that if gigantic ice sheets in Greenland or Antarctica melt, the sea could rise even more, flooding coastal areas and islands and causing widespread environmental disruptions.

The report recommended large drops in carbon emissions after 2015 to contain the changes, but governments should reconsider whether even those targets go far enough, Pachauri said.”

– Why all the insistence on taking things out of context climate skeptic?