Hawaiian Patriots Contact Hospitals: Obama & Mom Never There?

Posted on December 3, 2008

Cross-posted by Maggie at Maggie’s Notebook

Sun setting on Hawaii and maybe on the Obama Presidency
Who will do the right thing?

Earth Frisk Blog claims that Honolulu hospitals have no record of Ann Dunham (Obama) giving birth to Barack Obama.

According to admin at Earth Frisk, all of the following hospitals were:

…called or visited from November 20-December 2nd, 2008. Hospital employees bribed, some gave info for free. All to be released on video shortly

Hospitals you can check yourself

We were pretty detailed in our calls and visits thanks to dozens of native Hawaiian patriots! To the College Republicans all over the Island kudos!. You can look at every hospital here and call or visit any of them. Everyone has a family member working in a hospital. Talk, pay and bribe. You can file freedom of information acts, you can do everything and anything you wish. Barack Obama was never born in a hospital in Hawaii as claimed.

As the blog says, we can check this ourselves – or we can let the Supreme Court weigh in here.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

» Filed Under Barack Obama, Constitution, Democrats, Elections, Fraud/misrepresentation, Liberal Media/Bias, National Security, News, Obama Birth Certificate, Obstruction of Justice, The United States of America, U.S. Constitution, Voter/Election Fraud


Trackback URL

Comments

27 Responses to “Hawaiian Patriots Contact Hospitals: Obama & Mom Never There?”

  1. Jay on December 3rd, 2008 3:27 pm

    Maggie, is this blog claiming to have contacted EVERY single hospital in Hawaii?

  2. Maggie Thornton on December 3rd, 2008 3:40 pm

    What the site says is:

    “All of these were called or visited from November 20 – December 2nd 2008. It is confirmed, OBAMA not born in any hospital in Honolulu County! NONE FACT!”

    Seems unlikely they would leave one or two out and they say “any” hospital – NONE.

  3. Jay on December 3rd, 2008 3:45 pm

    Well, it seems more probable now that I understand the scope was focused on Honolulu instead of the entire state.

  4. Maggie Thornton on December 3rd, 2008 3:51 pm

    Sorry I didn’t clarify that. I think that is where his mother’s parents lived, and where both he and his sister say he was born. I don’t know of any claim of being born outside of Honolulu.

  5. Jay on December 3rd, 2008 4:10 pm

    Do you think the “bribe” portion in this claim will reflect badly upon these finds?

  6. Jay on December 3rd, 2008 4:18 pm

    I question this a bit because it is illegal for Hospitals to release this information, and bribing them is illegal in itself.

  7. Maggie Thornton on December 3rd, 2008 4:19 pm

    Jay, only if the ones bribed didn’t tell the truth – and we’re talking about only one person because Obama could have only been born in one hospital. We’re not talking about numerous bribed lies. There would only be reason for one lie.

    The bribes probably prompted people to look into records that they should not have been looking into.

    I don’t know. Even Obama doesn’t appear to know. I know the hospital I was born in. When I was little, my parents would point it out to me when we passed by. This would be the case for any child living in the birth city for a number of years – which Obama did – even with his years in Indonesia. Grandma and Grandpa would have known the hospital he was born in.

  8. Maggie Thornton on December 3rd, 2008 4:21 pm

    As to illegal for hospitals to release information or to be bribed, I agree. Doesn’t negate the information given, however, if the information is true.

    Do you think FOIA can be used in this situation? Do you want me to take the post down?

  9. Angie on December 3rd, 2008 4:21 pm

    Probably only bode ill for those who had access to the records. They could be nailed for HIPAA violations.

  10. Jay on December 3rd, 2008 4:26 pm

    Don’t take the post down. I’m sure it will stir up plenty of healthy conversation and questions that need to be asked.

    We will wait and see when they release the video they promise. Keep us informed. Thanks, Jay

  11. Maggie Thornton on December 3rd, 2008 4:31 pm

    Jay – will do.

  12. Jon Brooks on December 3rd, 2008 4:33 pm

    Yanno… I’m all for waiting about 6 more months then really pursuing this and if he has been scamming us it would be so much nicer to see a liberal do a perp walk out of the White House. The damage to the left would be very very very very big and almost eternal. lets wait a little longer:)

  13. Jon Brooks on December 3rd, 2008 4:44 pm

    Of course that would buy them time to hire the worlds best forgers if not done already. The CIA probably wouldnt help him due to his ragging on them and to many loyalists from Bush 1 and 2 around. Not sure about the FBI though they always seem eager to go around killing fellow Americans and stick guns in babies faces, they could probably pull it off but not if the CIA caught wind.

  14. Angie on December 3rd, 2008 4:45 pm

    That’s a fine sentiment, Jon, and I can certainly see your point and feel a “tingle up my leg” at the prospect. The problem is, some of what I’ve been reading has pointed toward the fact that once inaugurated, the only way to get him out (even if he’s there illegally) would be impeachment. If the Democratic Congress wouldn’t impeach George W. Bush (you know, the devil in the flesh himself), WHY would they impeach their Golden Boy and risk any harm to their Party? They wouldn’t. They’d just pass an amendment to the Constitution to allow it – and prove that it really is nothing to any of them but a g-damned piece of paper.

    THAT… will be the beginning of the end.

  15. Jon Brooks on December 3rd, 2008 4:47 pm

    Oh yah, last post…keep Sandy Berger away from the records vault.

  16. Jon Brooks on December 3rd, 2008 4:48 pm

    Good angle ..angle. You caught me in a HOPE moment:) LOL

  17. Jon Brooks on December 3rd, 2008 4:53 pm

    That would be Civil War 2 you know. I guess I’d have to enlist in the 1st Ohio Republican Brigade. Getting up in years so I’d be like Mr. Brown at Gettysburg who at 80 plus years grabbed his musket and joined the union line. I’m however not ..that..old yet.

  18. Angie on December 3rd, 2008 4:56 pm

    You should watch the movie, The Second Civil War. They nuked Idaho, ya know. I’m waiting for them to drop a nuke on us here, probably in Detroit – and, Maggie, I don’t think it’ll come from those Muslims either, but right out of D.C. (like we were talking about the other day).

  19. Ron Kean on December 3rd, 2008 5:13 pm

    If I was the hospital administrator I’d publicize the fact a president was born there.

    It would be great advertising.

    Visit the room.

    Interview the Doctor and the nurse in the next newsletter.

    But they didn’t have the names of the Doctor or the nurse on the cert. of live birth.

  20. Jon Brooks on December 3rd, 2008 6:43 pm

    I believe a Certificate of Live Birth just documents that you showed up with a live baby
    from almost anywhere, they look at it and say..”Yup..its alive by cracky. Cute tyke too. Maybe he’ll grow up to be President some day. You the mom? Where was he born? I’ll sign that document now, see ya, have a nice day.” Maybe I’m wrong? Who knows.

  21. Jon Brooks on December 3rd, 2008 8:09 pm

    Googled Certificate of Birth and will admit
    that it can legally be presented in lieu of the “long form” (the actual birth certificate) for day to day requirements that may require a birth certificate. It does not have to have all the info of the long form on it to be accepted, such as Dr. or nurses name etc. However even with that said (or typed? lol) there is enough of a suspicion that there is either: 1)no long form availiable or 2) that it contains info which could be damaging or bolster claims
    that he was not born on US territory after all. Either way, would it not be more prudent just to allow it to be released to an unbiased outside authority so they could give a final thumbs up or thumbs down on its veracity and/or information without releasing anything sensitive should it be legal and okay? Just from the stonewalling alone the only logical conclusion that I, for instance, and I assume many many more resonable people can be reach is..where there is smoke there may be fire, and what are they hiding by fighting something this seemingly insignifigant. Maybe he is a stubborn SOB just like George Bush :) Maybe thats a good thing if/when he has the football. Maybe we should find out before he does get it.

    (Side note: Regarding Zarkawi’s comments
    about him )

    To Zarkawi:
    From: Typical American citizen

    Look..I didn’t vote for the man, nor would I have even under extreme torture. If he is legally qualified to be President and won semi-fair and square, then all I have to say to you is…

    SCREW YOU FATBOY!!

  22. Ponder on December 3rd, 2008 9:48 pm

    BRIBE? No! REWARD!

    How about an offer of $100,000 each –

    1. Doctor signing BC.
    2. Hospital administrator signing BC.

    The offer should be good in Hawaii or Kenya

  23. Thistle on December 3rd, 2008 9:55 pm

    OK…there is no evedence that Sarah Palin ever had a 5th child at any Alaskan hospital either…

  24. Ted on December 4th, 2008 1:15 am

    Folks, this is NOT rocket science.
    Since the Constitution’s Article II requires our President to be a “natural born citizen” (not merely a “citizen” as allowed for those living when the Constitution was enacted), meaning both parents were US “citizens” when the child was born (altho parents need not be “natural born” citizens), there’s NO WAY Obama can be President — regardless of being born in Kenya OR Hawaii — that is, to be “natural born citizen” (as opposed to being a “citizen”) being born on American soil is insufficient unless both parents are “citizens”. Obama’s dad was NOT an American citizen. He was a citizen of the UK (administering Kenya at the time).
    Case closed.

  25. Cris Ericson on December 4th, 2008 4:31 am

    PETITION to the ELECTORAL COLLEGE
    for the release of
    Barack Hussein Obama’s
    birth certificate,
    please sign
    http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageld=81550
    PLEASE SIGN PETITION

  26. Tom on December 5th, 2008 1:34 pm

    Ted is completely mistaken when he says “‘o be “natural born citizen” (as opposed to being a “citizen”) being born on American soil is insufficient unless both parents are “citizens”.”

    The Fourteenth Amendment states that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.” Since Hawaii is part of the United States, even if Barack Obama’s parents were both non-U.S. citizens who hadn’t even set foot in the country until just before he was born, he’d still qualify as a natural-born citizen.

  27. Ed Darrell on December 5th, 2008 7:07 pm

Leave a Reply