Comments on: Supreme Court Sends Citizenship Appeal to an Anthrax Lab

By: splink

splink — Sun, 14 Dec 2008 23:40:22 +0000

So if JINDAL (with Indian parents naturalized), Nader (with Lebanes parents naturalized) and Lieberman (with Polish parents naturalized) were eleigible,…..

How the hell is Obama (with a full grown Mother citizen) not eligible?
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
They did not run for POTUS !!

By: Maggie Thornton

Maggie Thornton — Thu, 11 Dec 2008 05:08:33 +0000

Brian, I have read the Federalist papers – numerous times. We have every right to petition the Court with our letters, however, it is a sad thing that we must do so – and none of us think the Court will do anything because anyone outside the Court has requested it.

The Courts should not be needed here. Congress should have been ready for this and protected the people.

By: Brian

Brian — Thu, 11 Dec 2008 04:55:41 +0000

So, I have a question for all of you self-proclaimed Constitutional scholars. Is it proper for the Supreme Court to be influenced by the letters you urge to be sent? Have any of you read the Federalist Papers on an independent judiciary? Or do you pick and choose which of our cherished principles you care about?

The Supreme Court will dismiss all of these cases. There is no reasonable argument that any of the plaintiffs had standing. The Supreme Court is not going to hear cases that offer no new issues concerning standing.

Is it any coincidence that all of these plaintiffs represent themselves. Could it be that none of them could find a lawyer to bring such frivolous claims?

By: dragoon

dragoon — Tue, 09 Dec 2008 20:48:11 +0000

Jindal is not eligible, as his parents were naturalized after his birth. Unfortunate for us, but he still has an illustrious career ahead of him. Just can’t be President.

Are some Republicans being silent because of Jindal? I would hope not. One party must still uphold the Constitution, even if we’ve temporarily gone mad with the bailout.

By: Informer

Informer — Tue, 09 Dec 2008 12:41:30 +0000

HERE is the “birth certificate” debunked:

http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/12956.htm

And this is the clincher for me:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=82680

I dare an Obamanoid to claim that this is just a coincidence.

By: laughable

laughable — Tue, 09 Dec 2008 01:19:50 +0000

HERE is the birth certificate!!!!
http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate

Hawaii – BY LAW – does NOT issue certified birth certificates to NON-FAMILY members or those without “tangible” interest.

Do you know how many MILLIONS of AMERICANS would not be citizens if Donofrio’s/Berg’s/Wrotnowski’s logic were applied by the courts?

Insane that you even have to think about that…

By: Jen

Jen — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 16:01:54 +0000

You have been stuffed a sock in thy Republican mouth. Cheers.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/12/08/supreme_court_declines_to_hear.html

By: Kevin

Kevin — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 03:03:07 +0000

Jon Brooks says: “It should be 100% obvious to anyone by now that if disclosure has been thwarted for this long regarding showing a document (birth certificate) that you or I would have to show for a number of common instances in our lives”

I personally cannot think of any “common instance” where the certification of the facts of Obama’s birth from his home state of Hawaii, that we have all seen, would be insufficient. The only time in my life I needed a birth certificate was when I got a US passport, and Obama’s certification meets all the requirements for that.

By: Kevin

Kevin — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 02:50:17 +0000

“Berg is quoted as saying that he is one-thousand percent certain that Obama is not a natural-born U.S. citizen. Obama and the DNC are not “obligated” to file an answer, and Berg says that he “believes that the lack of response could be rooted less in procedure and more in audacity…” “The feeling may be that, if they respond, they could hold themselves out for perjury later on when we’re successful.””

One-thousand percent? Berg is no better a mathematician than he is a lawyer. At least he is more honest than some of the anti-Obama bloggers when says that there is no obligation for Obama to respond. He attributes this non-response to “audacity” or “fear of perjury”. To what does he attribute the Federal Election Commission’s (also named in the suit) failure to respond? I don’t know if perjury applies to such court filings. I hope it does, so that Berg can be put away for a long time.

By: Secretroses

Secretroses — Sat, 06 Dec 2008 22:52:24 +0000

I think there is a very Valid concern, and valid requests for Obama to prove his eligibility and produce the vault birth certificate. There is no powers that be hindering him from doing this. He chose to seal his own records thru the Governor
of Hawaii. He and The DNC have defied a supreme court order to produce it for them.
This is very odd behavior. The public wants to know why, that is not a lynch mob or crackpots.
If he was born in Hawaii to a US citizen mother, or in Kenya to a US citizen mother, he would still be an American citizen, natural born.

Even if he had dual citizenship with Kenya
because of his father, it would not affect his US citizenship unless he swore allegiance to Kenya when he came of age.

But, there is another issue…that is that when his mother and he moved to Indonesia and she married an indonesian citizen who adopted Barak, and gave him Indonesian citizenship, does that affect his us citizenship? I ask because Indonesia does not allow dual citizenship, so if he was ever a citizen of indonesia, his us citizenship was forfeit. Could this also be why his mother sent him back to Hawaii to live with his grandmother, to establish his citizenship in the US!!!

It seems like He is a us citizen, but why is he trying to cover it up?