Comments on: Hillary Pick Reveals Obama’s Lack of Experience

By: MR

MR — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 06:15:38 +0000

You’re clueless. Thank God Obama isn’t just bringing all his friends from Illinois and basing his administration picks on loyalty to him, as W did. That really worked out well, didn’t it?

By: HENRY

HENRY — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:50:18 +0000

BINGO!!!

Now you know how we feel about 8 years of constant Bush bashing by the left wing sewer.
Touche’

By: Sam

Sam — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:48:05 +0000

What a bunch of sore losers!!!Obama won the election with a clear mandate and a majority of votes both electoral and popular. My fellow Americans need to join the country as we work together in the midst of this crisis and stop it with the Obamabashing and rehash of lies pumped out of the right wing sewer during the campaign.

By: HENRY

HENRY — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:43:46 +0000

About your beloved Clinton and his surplus.
He and the democratic majority passed the largest tax increase to pad that surplus.
Look it up; EVERY republican voted against it, and it passed by ONE vote.
That is fact……

By: westsidedavid

westsidedavid — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:36:15 +0000

It is remarkable, and sad, that weeks after the election, those who despised Obama are still doing everything within their power to trash him. I hope that eventually they realize that the country they are trashing is still called the UNITED States, for a reason.

By: HENRY

HENRY — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:32:28 +0000

Nothing to do with the subject, but just had to say it.
When I was in the military during Viet Nam, I was investigated before being granted a top secret cryptographic security clearance.
The FBI interviewed family and friends, past and present; they needed to know every school that I attended, and the address of all my residences since birth.
My question is this; if that much effort and money was expended for a security clearance for a regular guy like me, then how does Barack Obama, with all his anti-American associations, and affiliations, get cleared for the mother of all security clearances??
Just wondering………………

By: loboinok

loboinok — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:27:42 +0000

We had a balance budget with a surplus. The economy was thriving.

A Democrat Presidency with a Republican Congress.

Now we have a Republican Presidency with a Democrat Congress with a budget deficit and a economy in the toilet.

Nothing bad happen on Clinton’s watch.

And you have the audacity to call the writer a clueless idiot.

Why would you want new faces with no experience in a bad economy and a situation like this.[?]

Why are you asking such a stupid question? You are the one who voted for the inexperienced new face whose party opposed restrictions and oversight that would have prevented this mess.

Instead of voting for Hillary, you vote in a middleman who will give you the same.

I used to be a Republican who voted 95% in favor of the GOP. I also used to deplore Clinton and his staff, but looking back it was a SUCCESSFUL Administration.

Riiight! No doubt you used to be a “Christian” who went to church twice a week before discovering the “truth.”

By: Bryan

Bryan — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:54:37 +0000

This article is written by an idiot who has no clue whatsoever. Go back and do your homework again. What was so wrong during the Clinton years? We had a balance budget with a surplus. The economy was thriving. Nothing bad happen on Clinton’s watch. Obama is just reaching out to fill his cabinet with experience personell. Why would you want new faces with no experience in a bad economy and a situation like this.I used to be a Republican who voted 95% in favor of the GOP. I also used to deplore Clinton and his staff, but looking back it was a SUCCESSFUL Administration.

By: Freddy

Freddy — Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:18:07 +0000

What an idiotic post, rife with assumptions, guesses and sheer fabrications. I challenge you to back up any of your nonsensical assertions with facts.

And what’s this whole thing about “going to Biden for foreign policy advice”? Biden, unlike Cheney, understands the CONSTITUTIONAL parameters of the Vice Presidency. That of an individual-in-waiting in case the President is incapacitated. He will resume this role.

And what’s so bad about Clinton appointees? Did we not experience a balanced budget and the most expansive growth this country has seen in a generation during his tenure? And what have we seen under Bush? Under your dyslexic hero: One insane war that we pay out the nose for. Another that is lost (uuhhh did we get Bin Laden yet?) A sincerely broken economy.

All Clinton did was bang his intern and lie about it. Bush lied, people died, and he banged all of us.

Get a clue. Your party is done. Think 1933. You’re looking forward to generations of Democratic rule, so get over it.

By: Katie

Katie — Tue, 25 Nov 2008 19:39:32 +0000

Hillary’s pick only shows what promises Obama made to get them on board. She has no experience in this field and is a bad choice for it.