<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Children perform better if mother stays at home</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/11/08/children-perform-better-if-mother-stays-at-home/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/11/08/children-perform-better-if-mother-stays-at-home/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:45:51 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Beverley Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/11/08/children-perform-better-if-mother-stays-at-home/comment-page-1/#comment-105913</link>
		<dc:creator>Beverley Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 23:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=16313#comment-105913</guid>
		<description>Instead of looking at this issue in terms of women being liberated from child-rearing and able to freely pursue earning, we need to look at the common sense observation that anyone you love, spouse, partner, parent, is not happy to be replaced by a paid stand-in. Small children thrive where they feel loved.  We should look at the role of taking care of kids as vital to the wellbeing of kids, vital to the maintenance of a productive, healthy generation and therefore useful work in an economy. Being home with the children is not&#039;staying home&#039; or opting out of work. It is taking on vital work, intense 18  hour days, often to do lifesaving tasks, and the women&#039;s  movement is not fulfilled until we value this role as much as we value paid work. Then women can choose which&#039; work&#039; to do as their hearts lead them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of looking at this issue in terms of women being liberated from child-rearing and able to freely pursue earning, we need to look at the common sense observation that anyone you love, spouse, partner, parent, is not happy to be replaced by a paid stand-in. Small children thrive where they feel loved.  We should look at the role of taking care of kids as vital to the wellbeing of kids, vital to the maintenance of a productive, healthy generation and therefore useful work in an economy. Being home with the children is not&#8217;staying home&#8217; or opting out of work. It is taking on vital work, intense 18  hour days, often to do lifesaving tasks, and the women&#8217;s  movement is not fulfilled until we value this role as much as we value paid work. Then women can choose which&#8217; work&#8217; to do as their hearts lead them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
