Could Obama Be Planning a Chavez?
Posted on October 28, 2008
Will Obama, with a Reid Pelosi led Congress, with a radical judicial system pull a Hugo Chavez?
A note from Radarsite: Just moments ago Radarsite received this fascinating comment to a previous Radarsite article from Marion Valentine of Val’s Word.com. If ever a comment to Radarsite deserved an entire article it is this one. Of all the potential scenarios resulting from an Obama victory this must certainly be the most frightening. But is it really possible? Read this excellent and powerful short essay and reach your own conclusions.
——————————————————-
After spending nine years in Navy Intelligence as … After spending nine years in Navy Intelligence as a Cryptologist, intercepting communications from Marxist/Socialist countries, breaking their codes, and gathering intelligence in “other” ways. I am familiar with their methods of using the media for propaganda, using the educational system to indoctrinate young minds, using the judicial system, and voter fraud to steal elections. This is what is happening now in America. From everything I have researched in the last two years, has lead me to conclude that Obama was selected, tutored, groomed, scripted, and financed by Radical Marxist/Socialists to become the puppet leader of the USSA. There is a vast difference between Social Democrats and Radical Marxist/Socialists. Hillary Clinton is a Social Democrat. Obama, Pelosi, Reid, Dodd, Schumer, Durbin, Franks, Boxer, and a few others now in Congress are Radical Marxist/Socialists.
On my website: [valsword.spaces.live.com] I have a 16 minute video of an interview with Yure Bezmenov a KGB agent who defected in 1970. This interview was recorded 24 years ago, and the transcript highlights, in Yuri’s own words confirm what I mentioned in the first paragraph. I pray that I am wrong, but from everything I have researched, I believe Obama, with a Reid Pelosi led Congress, with a radical judicial system will pull a Hugo Chavez.
In a recent address to his subjects, carried by fiat on all of the nation’s television channels, Venezuela’s authoritarian president Hugo Chávez Frias, who has previously taken over the airways for the celebration of his own birthday, now turned his country’s attention to more urgent matters. The time had come, he explained, to move the “Bolivarian revolution” from its Lenin-like beginnings of transitional capitalism towards a more robust command economy. The nation had at last “broken the chains of the old, exploitative capitalist system,” he said. “The state now has the obligation to build the model of a socialist economy.”
The next stage of the socialist revolution will require making thirty-three separate amendments to the Venezuelan constitution—a document Chávez previously rewrote upon his ascension to Miraflores Palace in 1999. The most dramatic and controversial change will eliminate presidential term limits, ensuring the fulfillment of Chavez’s promise not to leave office until 2021. To Hugo Chávez, a permanent revolution requires that he wield permanent power. It’s a risky move, considering recent opinion polls showing a majority of Venezuelans skeptical to further constitutional “reform,” especially if it means the possibility of adopting a President Chávez for life. But the same public, polling data demonstrates, also opposed the government’s refusal to renew a broadcast license for RCTV, the country’s oldest and most anti-Chávez private television network, and that storm seems to have passed.
» Filed Under ACORN, Bill Ayers, Domestic Enemies, Elections, Indoctrination, Liberal Media/Bias, Marxism, National Security, News, Socialism, The United States of America
Trackback URL
Comments
5 Responses to “Could Obama Be Planning a Chavez?”
Leave a Reply
I have my own military experience with manipulating information, and forcing thoughts, ideas, and, well, lies (though the gentle term for it is ‘misinformation’) on people.
Isn’t is amazing how B-HO is so popular even though his program is little more that “hope and chnge”? How O-Biden can repeatedly claim such falsehoods as the billion dollar tax cut for ‘corporations’? Videos and audio recordings of B-HO espousing Marxism, the ‘defects’ in the US Constitution (it’s a document of negative rights’- negative for who, the state? or negative in that it doesn’t give rights to health care, abortion, prosperity to people) are ignored, downplayed, or treated as if they don’t even exist.
Try this with your friends, repeat a lie nine times in the course of a conversation, and see if they don’t believe it even if they are initially skeptical. Then listen to the phrases being repeated by the candidates. Do they repeat it nine times????
Stupid people are being had, and the rest of us are going to pay the price for it.
More bad news today:
Obama Leads in Florida, Ohio, Must-Win Battlegrounds for McCain
By Catherine Dodge
Oct. 29 (Bloomberg) — Barack Obama leads in Florida and Ohio, states Republican John McCain must win to capture the presidency, as voters prefer the Democratic presidential nominee’s personal traits and approach on the economy and health care.
Obama, an Illinois senator, tops Arizona Senator McCain by 50 percent to 43 percent among likely voters in Florida, a Bloomberg/Los Angeles Times poll shows. He leads 49 percent to 40 percent in Ohio, as voters in the two states overwhelmingly rate domestic concerns as more important than national security.
Voters choose Obama, 47, as the candidate best able to handle the financial crisis and health care. And by an almost 2- to-1 margin, they say the Democrat has “the better temperament and personality to be president.”
“Domestic issues are the outstanding issues of the day, and Obama has been owning those,” says Susan Pinkus, the Los Angeles Times polling director. What is more, “voters are more comfortable with him” after his three debate performances.
Florida voters by more than 2-to-1 say a candidate’s views on domestic issues such as health care and the economy are more important than positions on the war in Iraq and terrorism; voters in Ohio say the same by a 3-to-1 margin.
Crucial States
No Republican has won the White House without capturing Ohio, and Florida helped George W. Bush obtain two terms in the White House. The current U.S. electoral map, polls show, indicates it would be almost impossible for McCain, 72, to win without carrying those two states.
In 2004, Bush won 286 Electoral College votes, including Ohio’s 20 and Florida’s 27. It takes 270 to win and if Massachusetts Senator John Kerry, the 2004 Democratic nominee, had won either of those states, he would have defeated the incumbent president.
Less than a week before the Nov. 4 election, Obama is running ahead in all the states that Kerry won, and is highly competitive in more than half a dozen states where Bush prevailed.
There’s also a gender gap in the Democrat’s favor. Among women voters in Florida, Obama leads 51 percent to 41 percent; in Ohio, his lead is 54 percent to 38 percent. Obama has a small lead among men in Florida, while McCain is slightly ahead with male voters in Ohio.
Temperament
In Florida, 58 percent of voters say Obama has a better temperament to be president, compared with 30 percent for McCain. In Ohio, Obama beats McCain on that question 57 percent to 29 percent.
“I find Obama to be pretty calm under any circumstance,” says poll respondent Donna Orcutt, 63, of Toledo, Ohio. “In the debates, some of the zingers he got he handled pretty good. If the object was to see if they could make him lose his temper, that didn’t happen.”
Orcutt, a Democrat who is retired and used to work for a house-cleaning company and as a secretary, says Obama has a better understanding of the economy because he didn’t grow up in a privileged environment. McCain, she says, “is a very nice man,” though he has never had to worry “about where the next paycheck is coming from.”
On the question of which candidate they trust to make the right decision about the economy, voters in Florida pick Obama over McCain by a 9-point margin, and in Ohio, the Democrat leads by 12 points.
Health Care
Obama does even better on the question of which candidate would better handle health care. In Florida, he is preferred by 52 percent of voters, compared with 34 percent for McCain; in Ohio, 54 percent pick Obama and 30 percent choose the Republican.
The Democrat also is ahead with white working-class voters, who overwhelmingly favored his opponent for the Democratic nomination, Senator Hillary Clinton of New York. Obama gets the support of 52 percent of these voters in Ohio, compared with 38 percent for McCain; in Florida, this group is almost evenly split, with a slight edge for Obama.
Even though Bush used victories in Ohio and Florida to build his winning coalition, more than seven in 10 voters in both states now disapprove of his job performance; more than eight in 10 say the country is on the wrong track.
Seventy percent of voters in Florida and 62 percent in Ohio say the recent troubles in the economy have hurt their family’s financial situation.
Change Agent
Ohio and Florida voters also say the ability to bring change to Washington — a central theme of Obama’s campaign — is more important than having the most experience, which is one of McCain’s selling points.
“I truly see Obama as someone who will come in with a less political and more intelligent problem-solving approach to really trying to address the critical problems,” says poll respondent Laurie Kadoch, 60, a Miami Democrat, who teaches at Florida International University College of Law.
Bush’s record is hurting McCain in Ohio, where more than half of voters say the Republican will continue the current administration’s policies. Voters also are split on that question in Florida.
As in previous polls, the bright spots for McCain are his ability to successfully handle the war in Iraq and protect the country from terrorism. The Arizona senator leads Obama in those categories in both states, the poll shows.
“He does have a whole lot more experience than Obama does,” said Republican poll respondent Maria Lyle, 25, a stay- at-home mother from Jackson Center, Ohio. “His ideas line up more with how I feel. With the terrorism issue, I feel we do need to have our troops over there.”
Palin Pick
McCain’s choice of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin to be his running mate appears to be a drag on the ticket in both states. Less than half of voters in Florida and Ohio view her as qualified to be president. By comparison, more than seven in 10 voters in both states say Democratic vice presidential nominee Joe Biden, a Delaware senator, is qualified to be president.
The survey of 809 registered voters in Florida — including 639 likely voters — and of 816 registered voters in Ohio — including 644 likely voters — was conducted Oct. 25-27. The margin of sampling error in both states is plus or minus 3 percentage points among registered voters, and of plus or minus 4 points among likely voters.
Don’t call me stupid because I’ve been sick of these divisive politics and pandering to the masses that has gone on for the better part of 20 years, and I’ve actually gone out and educated myself on this current campaign season.
Just because we disagree doesn’t make me wrong. All these deep conspiracies people are clinging too are just the wrong approach we should be taking as Americans. Instead of delving so deep into unsubstantiated information and leads – spend more time comparing the policies of the two major candidates, and both contain good meat, no fluff.
Don’t dismiss either one as just talk or rhetoric, I’ve done that before for McCain and he showed me the energy he displayed as a wonderful Senator. I am voting for Barack Obama, both because his policies make the most sense and he has practical and actual steps to making these things become reality. He wants to make the government work better, that is not socialism, that is holding those accountable that are spending OUR tax dollars.
I am also voting for Barack because the John McCain I respected from 2000 is not the John McCain of 2008. It truly is sad because he had to accept a large influence of the GOP in order to keep his campaign alive – it is tragic because if John was being John, this would be a much closer race, and not because of policies, but in terms of character.
Barack has already displayed Presidential character in the steadiness of his campaign and his responses to allegations/attacks/false stories. To deny it would be to withhold the truth from one’s self.
I’ve been a lifelong democrat..always voted strick party line. But, this time I’m voting
for McCain. He’s got the right policies, the
right temprament, he’s faught and was a Pow for this country. And McCain doesn’t believe in abortion or homo marriages.
Just through his military experience gives him a strong leadership credentials. I believe that he will not cut and run from Iraq or Afghan.
He’ll make our military the strongest in the
world. McCain would NOT take this country towards SOCIALISM…something that Osama would do.
Now against Osama, he’s very inexperience, only was a comm organizer and a few years in
the senate.
He never ran a business, never met a payroll,
never govern a state, not even ran for city
council. It’s the biggest hoax and fraud on
the american people saying that he could fix
the economy…how could he is he never did
run a business, met a payroll, pushed economic policies, was never ever a governor
and never was a city councilman.
It’s like having a doctor operate on you when
he never went to med school other than played
ping pong games. Does playing ping pong qualifies one to be a doctor? Anymore than
being a comm organizer qualifies you to be an
economist be it enough a president.
Governor Sarah Palin has more experience under her little finger than Osama under his
oblong head.
There is more…Osama is in a stealth way going to make all WHITE/Brown/Chinese etc pay
“retributions” for way back slaves. He was
in such discussion with Conyers not long ago.
But, oh, no, people must not find out how this Arabic Marxist is about to fool and scam
the whole population.
More?..there are lawsuits pending on Osamas
ellgibility to be prez. Speculations are that
he was born in Kenya. Then his mother brought
him to Hawaii to get him a birth certificate
but there are many reasons as to why Osama
doesn’t want to produce a valid birth certificate giving data such as mother and father; dob; weight and height; country born
in and city; nationality; certificate ID #;
Folks, you don’t have to take my word, but I
sense that something is not right and we are
all being fooled.
I do believe that he is a closeted Islamist;
like a mans sperm trying to penetrate into a womans egg..so is Osama trying to break into
our political system. Mark my word all of you
who will be voting for Osama, you will regret
the day he was born.
Wow, people are still clinging to this idea that Obama was not born in the US? He released his birth certificate MONTHS ago, check it out here:
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html
It is posted in other paces as well, so people need to drop it. What it boils down to is that people are so caught up in conspiracy theories that they look past the policies these two candidates are running on. I am voting for Obama because I get the best tax break under his plan, and I LOVE his ideas for alternative fuels. He also has a calm head and is not reactionary, like Mccain is. The GOP is reaching for straws at this point, and the racist folks are coming out of the woodwork. Almost all the arguments I see against Obama have nothing to do with policies but everything to do with lies and deceit floating around on the internet. Do some real research and learn where each candidate stands. Then you can have an argument. Until then you are just an uninformed idiot.