OK to say anything about Palin’s family but must not even speak the truth about Obama’s

Less than 24 hours ago, I put up this post on a news site. It refers to the fact that there are nude pictures of Obama’s mother on the net. I didn’t put them there (Though I think I know who did). I just drew attention to the pictures and made them more accessible.

The hate-mail and outraged comments from Leftists you can imagine. When however I wrote back to one of the Leftists and said that I assumed that he also was outraged by the false claims about Sarah Palin’s family (claims that Trig was really her daughter’s baby etc., etc.) he didn’t even know what I was talking about. But as a Leftist he was much more likely to hear of the Leftist attacks on Palin’s family than he was to see my post. Clearly the scurrilous and totally false attacks on Palin were like water off a duck’s back to him. It was only adverse mentions of Obama’s family that provoked outrage.

Exactly what I expected, of course. You must not not even speak the truth about the anointed one if there is anything unpleasant about it. He is a second Mohammed.

Leftists can dish it out but they can’t take it back. If the Leftist comments about Palin had been even half civilized, I might have felt it inappropriate to mention Obama’s mother but, as it was, I simply applied their rule that anything goes these days.

So let me make some more “outrageous” comments on the matter:

Astute Blogger has just put up a comparison of a known picture of Obama’s mother with one of the pictures that I drew attention to. There is no doubt that both are of the same woman, even though the nude photo was of her when she was much younger. The long chin is particularly notable. Women normally (but not always) have receding chins. Very broadly, a strong chin in a woman indicates more testosterone and a strong sexual appetite.

Another thing to note: Frank Marshall Davis wrote an autobiography and “One chapter concerns the seduction by Mr Davis and his first wife of a 13-year-old girl called Anne”.

So who did put up the pictures originally? I think they got onto the net via a bulletin board, one of the predecessors of the internet. Bulletin boards had LOTS of pictures of nude women. The photographer is the logical one to have uploaded them and Frank Marshall Davis died in 1987 — well inside the lifetime of bulletin boards.

Barack Obama senior, on the other hand, died in Africa in 1982 and we read of his latter years: “Obama Sr.’s life then took a tailspin into drinking and poverty, from which he never recovered.” So it seems unlikely that Barack Obama senior was the uploader.

Posted by John Ray. For a daily critique of Leftist activities, see DISSECTING LEFTISM. For a daily survey of Australian politics, see AUSTRALIAN POLITICS Also, don’t forget your roundup of Obama news and commentary at OBAMA WATCH (2). Email me (John Ray) here

Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to Ping.fm Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Email This Email This

Posted by JonJayRay on October 23, 2008 8:19 am

» Filed Under 1st Amendment, Child Exploitation, News

Trackback URL:

Comments

6 Responses to “OK to say anything about Palin’s family but must not even speak the truth about Obama’s”

  1. Ian Pattinson on October 23rd, 2008 8:36 am

    Your “Leftist” correspondent may just not have known what you were tlking about. The Palin baby thing was a two day piece of idiocy and the only people who’ve been obsessing about it are right wing bloggers pretending it was still relevant when normal people had forgotten about it.

    As for the rest of your post and the beyond tenuous connections you’ve come up with to justify your little fantasy- Straws. Clutching. And, most importantly, irrelevant.

  2. The Machine on October 23rd, 2008 2:39 pm

    Funny to see which “irrelvant” posts deserve the time of left wing “rebuttals, eh?

    Must have touched a nerve…

  3. Ian Pattinson on October 23rd, 2008 5:05 pm

    It’s touched my funny bone. This whole silly conspiracy theory is hilarious. I just thought I’d keep it stoked up by pointing out some inconsistencies and sounding dismissive so there’ll be more and I can be amused again.

  4. loboinok on October 23rd, 2008 9:59 pm

    I just thought I’d keep it stoked up by pointing out some inconsistencies and sounding dismissive so there’ll be more and I can be amused again.

    Trolls just can’t catch a break!

  5. Nia on October 24th, 2008 3:49 am

    The only reason the idiotic Palin-s’daughers-baby theory was blown up in two days was that it was replaced with the announcement that her daughter was pregnant and you Lefties jumped all over that instead. With words like “slut” and “trailer trash.”

    I’ll never forget how you people treated Palin. You’ll never unring that bell. Ever.

  6. KansasCity Vet on October 24th, 2008 5:14 am

    From the Telegraph in the UK.

    “He knew Stan [Anne] real well,” said Dawna Weatherly-Williams, a close friend of Mr Davis “They’d play Scrabble and drink and crack jokes and crack jokes and argue. Frank always won and he was always very braggadocio about it too. It was all jocular. They didn’t get polluted drunk. And Frank never really did drugs, though he and Stan would smoke pot together.”

    Note that Anne Dunham wore her hair short in highschool. Davis was a bi-sexual pedophile. Meaning he would like his ‘girls’ with short bobbed boyish hair.

  • Advertise

  • Donate

  • Our Store

    • ACLU Bulldozer
    • Click the design to visit our store and help Stop the ACLU!
  • Syndicate Me