A Shocking Expose of the Truth Behind the Obama/Ayers Connection from CNN — What??

Shocking CNN Expose of the Obama/Ayers Connection

Cross posted from Glenn Beck.com

A note from Radarsite: Could it be that this is really the light at the end of this long dark tunnel of lies of the nefarious Obama campaign? It certainly is a shocking and unexpected development. To have this kind of unquestionably negative expose coming from CNN — of all places — is definitely a sign that there is still hope out there that the American people can finally accept the fact that Obama is what we have been saying he is for all these months. Is it too little too late? I hope and pray that it isn’t. – rg
———————————————————————–

From the Glenn Beck Show: 9 October 2008
Glenn Beck: CNN report on Ayers

GLENN: I want to play a piece from CNN. This is not Fox. This is CNN. This isn’t CNN Headline News. This is CNN. Believe me, I know how difficult it is to get something on the air at CNN. To get something on the air at CNN that is critical of Barack Obama, not really the easiest thing. There are not people clamoring to get that on the air. They check everything six ways to Sunday. Believe me, I know. I have to play this report from Anderson Cooper. Remember, this is not some right wing kook. This is not Fox. This is Anderson Cooper on CNN. Listen to this report on the “No connections between William Ayers and Barack Obama.”
COOPER: Bill Ayers and his wife Bernardine Dohrn in the 1960s and Seventies were radicals, members of the Weather Underground, an anti-Vietnam War group that bombed federal buildings including the U.S. capitol and the Pentagon. On the run for years, the case against them was thrown out due to illegal wire taps and prosecutor misconduct. Ayers has never repented and has said as late as 2001 he wished he had done more to stop the war.
Barack Obama confirmed during a primary debate that he knew Ayers and, when pressed, said they served on a charitable foundation board together.
GLENN: Listen to this.
COOPER: Obama condemned Ayers support of violence. But the relationship between Obama and Ayers went much deeper, ran much longer and was much more political than Obama said.
GLENN: Stop, stop. Just stop there. But it gets worse, again. How many times have you heard people say, “Oh, it’s the Clinton News Network, it’s the Communist News Network.” Yeah, sure. Again, the report from CNN on the connection between Ayers and Obama.
VOICE: Arguing is that somehow the fact that these people who served both educational reformers in Chicago, both of whom did have their paths cross professionally as well as neighbors occasionally, that somehow this association is a problem for Barack Obama because of Bill Ayers’ past and things that happened in the 1960s when Barack Obama was 7 years old. And that’s just wrong. And frankly it’s quite unfair.
COOPER: One place their paths repeatedly crossed according to a CNN review of board minutes and other records was Chicago’s Annenberg Challenge project where a $50 million grant from the Annenberg Foundation matched locally funds to schools. According to participants and project records, Bill Ayers fought to bring the Annenberg grant to Chicago. Barack Obama was recruited as its chair. For seven years Bill Ayers and Obama, among many others, worked on funding for education projects including some experiments supported by Ayers.
Your browser does not support inline frames or is currently configured not to display inline frames.
GLENN: Listen to this.
COOPER: Stanley Kurtz, a conservative researcher for the Ethics and Public Policy Center who has been reviewing the recently –
GLENN: This is the guy that Obama has tried to silence, now on CNN.
KURTZ: Instead of giving money directly to schools, they gave money to what they called external partners and these partners were often radical community organizer groups.
COOPER: And the board gave hundreds of thousands of dollars to Bill Ayers’ small schools project, promoting alternative education, the peace school with a curriculum centered around a United Nations theme.
GLENN: Oh.
COOPER: And another school where the focus was African-American studies.
GLENN: Oh.
VOICE: And this was directly funded by Annenberg?
KURTZ: Oh, yes, under Obama’s chairmanship. Oh, yes, in a specific draw of the board of –
GLENN: Stop. This doesn’t bother anyone? This, I know this bothers you. This doesn’t? How do you dismiss? He was a chairman of the board that did experimental schools with a guy who says you shouldn’t discipline children, that quote: Children should rise up and kill their parents. Okay? He’s never corrected that. Never stood down from that. He’s on the board with that man doing experimental schools, and one of them is a school based on the United Nations? And somehow or another we’re just supposed to dismiss all of this. That, “It doesn’t really matter, oh, he’s not like that, oh, he didn’t know.” This guy is a full-fledged fascist in the wings. Now, that’s not to say that he’s going to become a fascist. This is the closest that we have ever come to having one. No, I take that back. We actually had one. His name was Woodrow Wilson. This guy actually put hundreds of thousands of people in jail for speaking out against him, the government or World War I. This guy developed a system through the Department of Justice where if you heard anyone speak out against the war, you heard anyone speak out against our country, you were to call the Department of Justice, your name would be withheld and the person you heard speaking out would go to prison! So we’ve had a fascist before. So if anybody tells you we can’t have one again, don’t listen to them. We’ve had one before, and this one is coming with a neon sign. This one’s coming with his own little militant children following behind him. This one’s coming with the Hitler youth in tow. How many times did we say in 1992, “Guys, I think this guy has a sex problem.” No, no, no. Now, I was willing to dismiss it after he was on 60 Minutes and say, you know what, we all have problems. I get it, we all have problems. He admitted it, we have problems, we’ve worked on it in our relationship, we don’t have a perfect relationship; we’re working on it. Great. But then woman after woman after woman, and everybody started to deny. Everybody was like, no, come on, they’re just making that up; they’re just doing that. Well, we ended up having a problem on the bathroom floor of the White House. Who’s going to be on the bathroom floor in the next administration? Karl Marx? Although he would look pretty hot in a tight blue cocktail dress.

Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to Ping.fm Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Email This Email This

Posted by Roger W. Gardner on October 10, 2008 1:42 am

» Filed Under Debate, Democrats, Domestic Enemies, Education, Elections, Fascism, Liberal Media/Bias, News, Obama/Biden, Socialism, UN, terrorism

Trackback URL:

Links

Comments

14 Responses to “A Shocking Expose of the Truth Behind the Obama/Ayers Connection from CNN — What??”

  1. Roger on October 10th, 2008 9:20 am

    Wow, very incriminating. You know it’s very sad that the Bush Administration is the reason why were are about to elect a awful candidate like Obama. Bush made terrible decisions again and again. Now because of Bush, we are very likely headed for the dark, dank dungeon of socialism. How can we change this probable outcome? I don’t think we can unless we realize that just because Bush failed miserably doesn’t mean that McCain will follow closely in his footsteps.

  2. Roger W. Gardner on October 10th, 2008 9:30 am

    Just for the sake of clarity — the above “Roger” is not Roger W. Gardner.

  3. Jae on October 10th, 2008 9:47 am

    Does anyone acknowledge the fact that although Ayers had an infamous past, he is now a respected and “Distinguished Professor” at the University of Illinois with 2 Masters in Education and a Doctorate in Education.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Ayers

    Doesn’t every one in America deserve the right to be forgiven of their past. If Obama met him and worked with him while he was a prominent member of the Chicago elite, why are we questioning Obamas patriotism. How many of you have worked that hard to right the wrongs in your life, like Ayers has?

  4. Michelle on October 10th, 2008 9:56 am

    Wow, aren’t you all so quick to be judge and jury after one article? Is this all it takes to convict a person these days? Is this all the evidence you people need? God forbid you ever wind up in front of a jury of your peers. I would certainly hope more evidence would be presented in your behalf.

  5. Roger on October 10th, 2008 9:59 am

    Jae,

    You sound like a good, smart person. But the point of the article is about Obamas judgmnet in the past, because of this it makes many people wonder about his judgment in the present and future. Yes, the Democrats do deserve to win this election, but my believe is that they made a mistake by not nominating Hillary.

  6. Michelle on October 10th, 2008 10:04 am

    I apologize, Jae. My reply was not intended toward you. You were exactly right on with your first reply. I should not have reacted so quickly out of anger, bad habit of mine. And yes you certainly are correct about the democrats deserving to win this election. Have a nice day.

  7. Roger W. Gardner on October 10th, 2008 10:15 am

    “Doesn’t every one in America deserve the right to be forgiven of their past. If Obama met him and worked with him while he was a prominent member of the Chicago elite, why are we questioning Obamas patriotism. How many of you have worked that hard to right the wrongs in your life, like Ayers has?”

    Wow. I thought I had seen it all. But this — this is absolute hogwash. Don’t you even read your own biased newspapers? He hasn’t asked for our forgiveness, he’s proud of being a domestic terrorist. He only wishes he had done more. You are so blinded by your fanatic devotion to Obama you can’t even read Ayers own words. And to think you might actually be voting in this election. God help us all.

  8. Roger on October 10th, 2008 10:34 am

    Michelle said,

    “And yes you certainly are correct about the democrats deserving to win this election”

    Yes, Michelle you are right and you are right to be angry because Bush was such a dope, however, do we the American people need to suffer to the extent of this? Obama is just a scary guy. I’m in Independent, and I always put country before party.

    And Michelle, Obama is not only guilty of the Ayers connection, he is connected to the most radical and dangerous people in the world; Nadhami Auchi, Rev Wright, M.Marzook, Farrakhan, Quadaffi, Allison Davis, Obango Obama, James Meeks, Tony Rezko, Odinga, Rashid Khalid, etc, please if you have time google each name with Obama and you’ll see that Obama may not be the safest person to allow into the White House. Michelle, if you’ve read this far, thanks.

  9. loboinok on October 10th, 2008 10:39 am

    RWG,

    You missed the statement by Jae that we have a Constitutional right to be forgiven. ;)

  10. Roger on October 10th, 2008 10:54 am

    loboinok,

    It’s not RWG, he doesn’t want to be assciated with me, I’m just Roger, With that said, yes, you Obama does have a right to be forgiven, however, his judgment in the past makes you wonder about his judgments in the present and future. I know it does for me. I’m scared of Obama.

    In reference to the Constition, If Obama has a right to be forgiven, then logicly Bush has a right to be forgiven too.
    In the end though, an examination of Obama’s record discloses the stuff he is made of–his own constitution. Beneath Obamas suit lies a leftist partisan who will readily resort to sly deceptions to advance his agenda of liberal judicial activism. Given the likelihood of so many changes in the membership of the Supreme Court over the next eight years, it is particularly important that voters this November recognize the real Obama.

  11. loboinok on October 10th, 2008 12:34 pm

    I was being facetious. The statement was made in ignorance. There is no Constitutional right to forgiveness.

  12. Roger on October 10th, 2008 1:32 pm

    This is true Ioboinok. Know this makes me feel stupid…lol.

  13. Roger W. Gardner on October 10th, 2008 8:38 pm

    “It’s not RWG, he doesn’t want to be assciated with me, I’m just Roger”

    This is a really foolish statement. We both have the same name — hence: the clarification. Period.

  14. Roger on October 11th, 2008 12:19 pm

    RWG, I was just kidding, why are you being so nasty?

  • Advertise

  • Donate

  • Our Store

    • ACLU Bulldozer
    • Click the design to visit our store and help Stop the ACLU!
  • Syndicate Me