Comments on: Election Fraud Minimal, Says Baltimore Democrat Sun http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/10/06/election-fraud-minimal-says-baltimore-democrat-sun/ Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:23:11 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: loboinok http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/10/06/election-fraud-minimal-says-baltimore-democrat-sun/comment-page-1/#comment-99720 loboinok Wed, 08 Oct 2008 11:10:17 +0000 http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=13907#comment-99720 <i>why don’t you either replace the profanity with ***’s, like grown up site do?</i> Better still; keep your advice,condescension and snark to yourself and run your site as you see fit. We will do the same here. If you can't make your point without the inclusion of sh*tty little remarks...don't waste your time. why don’t you either replace the profanity with ***’s, like grown up site do?

Better still; keep your advice,condescension and snark to yourself and run your site as you see fit. We will do the same here.

If you can’t make your point without the inclusion of sh*tty little remarks…don’t waste your time.

]]> By: Brad Friedman/BRAD BLOG http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/10/06/election-fraud-minimal-says-baltimore-democrat-sun/comment-page-1/#comment-99706 Brad Friedman/BRAD BLOG Wed, 08 Oct 2008 04:02:19 +0000 http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=13907#comment-99706 What profanity? I recall none, but if you're too precious to handle it, why don't you either replace the profanity with ***'s, like grown up site do? Or otherwise note why a comment has been removed. If there was any, it would be appropriate to remove it, and post it without that, if you can't stand it. There is helpful information to the hapless William in that reply, and I've seen no rules for posting that warned against "profanity". What profanity? I recall none, but if you’re too precious to handle it, why don’t you either replace the profanity with ***’s, like grown up site do? Or otherwise note why a comment has been removed.

If there was any, it would be appropriate to remove it, and post it without that, if you can’t stand it. There is helpful information to the hapless William in that reply, and I’ve seen no rules for posting that warned against “profanity”.

]]> By: loboinok http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/10/06/election-fraud-minimal-says-baltimore-democrat-sun/comment-page-1/#comment-99700 loboinok Wed, 08 Oct 2008 02:07:50 +0000 http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=13907#comment-99700 <i>You don’t even include a note to explain why you’ve removed it?? Are your arguments against it that week??</i> Profanity. You don’t even include a note to explain why you’ve removed it?? Are your arguments against it that week??

Profanity.

]]> By: Brad Friedman/BRAD BLOG http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/10/06/election-fraud-minimal-says-baltimore-democrat-sun/comment-page-1/#comment-99697 Brad Friedman/BRAD BLOG Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:25:09 +0000 http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=13907#comment-99697 You don't even include a note to explain why you've removed it?? Are your arguments against it that week?? Incredible. You don’t even include a note to explain why you’ve removed it?? Are your arguments against it that week??

Incredible.

]]> By: Brad Friedman/BRAD BLOG http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/10/06/election-fraud-minimal-says-baltimore-democrat-sun/comment-page-1/#comment-99696 Brad Friedman/BRAD BLOG Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:24:07 +0000 http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=13907#comment-99696 Why have you deleted my reply to you, William? Why have you deleted my reply to you, William?

]]> By: William Teach http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/10/06/election-fraud-minimal-says-baltimore-democrat-sun/comment-page-1/#comment-99568 William Teach Mon, 06 Oct 2008 23:21:35 +0000 http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=13907#comment-99568 OK, here's the one thing I would like to know, Brad: how would you fix the system to make voter fraud minimal? We won't ever get rid of it, but, perhaps I missed a post of yours (I probably check your site once a week, once every other week), but, I have seen lots of complaining about all sorts of EVIL GOP tricks and this voter fraud and that voter fraud, and it always seems to be the EVIL GOP behind it. What measures would you put in place? I'm a die hard Conservative (or, better, Classical Liberal) but I would have no problem with a federal database which would work similar to an I-9: you have to provide 2 pieces of documentation to prove you are you, preferablly a SS# and DL#. Then, at time of voting, show your voter registration card and ID. There are also some other ideas, and they all revolve around proving you are you. Still wouldn't be perfect, but, would certainly allow a better way of making sure a person is the correct person, are not fictional, and are not voting in more then one state/precinct. Heck, at one point, I was registered in North Carolina and New Jersey. I could have easily have voted in both states. I didn't. Just NC. I could do the same thing now. So, what is your idea? OK, here’s the one thing I would like to know, Brad: how would you fix the system to make voter fraud minimal? We won’t ever get rid of it, but, perhaps I missed a post of yours (I probably check your site once a week, once every other week), but, I have seen lots of complaining about all sorts of EVIL GOP tricks and this voter fraud and that voter fraud, and it always seems to be the EVIL GOP behind it.

What measures would you put in place? I’m a die hard Conservative (or, better, Classical Liberal) but I would have no problem with a federal database which would work similar to an I-9: you have to provide 2 pieces of documentation to prove you are you, preferablly a SS# and DL#. Then, at time of voting, show your voter registration card and ID. There are also some other ideas, and they all revolve around proving you are you. Still wouldn’t be perfect, but, would certainly allow a better way of making sure a person is the correct person, are not fictional, and are not voting in more then one state/precinct. Heck, at one point, I was registered in North Carolina and New Jersey. I could have easily have voted in both states. I didn’t. Just NC. I could do the same thing now.

So, what is your idea?

]]> By: Brad Friedman/BRAD BLOG http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/10/06/election-fraud-minimal-says-baltimore-democrat-sun/comment-page-1/#comment-99560 Brad Friedman/BRAD BLOG Mon, 06 Oct 2008 22:03:38 +0000 http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=13907#comment-99560 Are you THAT clueless? Apparently, you are, if you don't know the difference between phony claims of "voter fraud", by John Fund and his ilk, and real concerns about ELECTION fraud (gaming of elections via machines, administrative purges, etc.) For a hint, since you referenced The BRAD BLOG, you can be the judge on how your hero, propagandist John Fund held up last week when I interviewed him (he hung up at the first commercial break), or even your other hero, the reprehensible voter fraud fraudster Hans von Spakovsky, when I was with him on NPR over the weekend. Cowardly Fund Interview: http://www.bradblog.com/audio/PeterBCollins_Brad_JohnFund_100308.mp3 Lying Von Spakovsky Interview: http://www.bradblog.com/TavisSmiley_BradFriedman_HansVonSpakovsky_100308.mp3 If your readers want REAL information on your imaginary "reality of the real voter fraud perpetrated by Democrats", I suggest you see check the fruits of the Bush Administration's own Dept. Of Justice's unprecedented effort to apprehend those dastardly Democratic "voter fraud" villains right here: NYTIMES: "In 5-Year DOJ Effort, Scant Evidence of Voter Fraud" http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/washington/12fraud.html?ei=5088&en=277feccfa099c7d0&ex=1334030400&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1197490509-kQxLoEru+cH9aetsLB6CnA Or see Bush's own U.S. Election Assistance Commission's inability to find "voter fraud" either in their bi-partisan report: http://www.bradblog.com/?p=4391 But you go ahead and keep chasing those ghosts, allow yourself to be played as a tool, and continue your masters' efforts at taking a huge dump on American values such as democracy and the U.S. Constitution. Whadda sucker. Your grandparents who may have fought and died for democracy are likely spinning in their graves, chief. How proud they must be of you. Are you THAT clueless? Apparently, you are, if you don’t know the difference between phony claims of “voter fraud”, by John Fund and his ilk, and real concerns about ELECTION fraud (gaming of elections via machines, administrative purges, etc.)

For a hint, since you referenced The BRAD BLOG, you can be the judge on how your hero, propagandist John Fund held up last week when I interviewed him (he hung up at the first commercial break), or even your other hero, the reprehensible voter fraud fraudster Hans von Spakovsky, when I was with him on NPR over the weekend.

Cowardly Fund Interview:
http://www.bradblog.com/audio/PeterBCollins_Brad_JohnFund_100308.mp3

Lying Von Spakovsky Interview:
http://www.bradblog.com/TavisSmiley_BradFriedman_HansVonSpakovsky_100308.mp3

If your readers want REAL information on your imaginary “reality of the real voter fraud perpetrated by Democrats”, I suggest you see check the fruits of the Bush Administration’s own Dept. Of Justice’s unprecedented effort to apprehend those dastardly Democratic “voter fraud” villains right here:

NYTIMES: “In 5-Year DOJ Effort, Scant Evidence of Voter Fraud”
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/washington/12fraud.html?ei=5088&en=277feccfa099c7d0&ex=1334030400&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1197490509-kQxLoEru+cH9aetsLB6CnA

Or see Bush’s own U.S. Election Assistance Commission’s inability to find “voter fraud” either in their bi-partisan report:
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=4391

But you go ahead and keep chasing those ghosts, allow yourself to be played as a tool, and continue your masters’ efforts at taking a huge dump on American values such as democracy and the U.S. Constitution.

Whadda sucker. Your grandparents who may have fought and died for democracy are likely spinning in their graves, chief.

How proud they must be of you.

]]>