<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sarah Palin&#8217;s A Great Governor, Isn&#8217;t She?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/10/02/sarah-palins-a-great-governor-isnt-she/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/10/02/sarah-palins-a-great-governor-isnt-she/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:08:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: eaglewingz08</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/10/02/sarah-palins-a-great-governor-isnt-she/comment-page-1/#comment-99158</link>
		<dc:creator>eaglewingz08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=13599#comment-99158</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s really saying that there are no environmentalists in Alaska which is nonsense, or that environmentalists don&#039;t support her, or that she&#039;s against reasonable environmental policies, which is also nonsense. In fact one of the SCOTUS decisions she had reservations about was the Exxon Valdez punitive damage reduction decision. If she were in the pocket of BIG OIL or against environmentalists per se, she would have been celebrating that decision instead of taking issue with it. But again libs have a one dimensional stereotypical view of conservatives, that is thoroughly fantasy based.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s really saying that there are no environmentalists in Alaska which is nonsense, or that environmentalists don&#8217;t support her, or that she&#8217;s against reasonable environmental policies, which is also nonsense. In fact one of the SCOTUS decisions she had reservations about was the Exxon Valdez punitive damage reduction decision. If she were in the pocket of BIG OIL or against environmentalists per se, she would have been celebrating that decision instead of taking issue with it. But again libs have a one dimensional stereotypical view of conservatives, that is thoroughly fantasy based.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

