HuffPo: All Hail The New Fuhrer, Sarah Palin
It is getting rather repetitive writing that this liberal and that progressive, this blog and that news outlet, have lost it, as their journey down Unhinged Lane has ended and they are now traveling down Interstate 5150. Once again, here we go!
Naomi Wolf: The Battle Plan II: Sarah “Evita” Palin, the Muse of the Coming Police State
Please understand what you are looking at when you look at Sarah “Evita” Palin. You are looking at the designated muse of the coming American police state.
You have to understand how things work in a closing society in order to understand “Palin Power.” A gang or cabal seizes power, usually with an affable, weak figurehead at the fore. Then they will hold elections — but they will make sure that the election will be corrupted and that the next affable, weak figurehead is entirely in their control. Remember, Russia has Presidents; Russia holds elections. Dictators and gangs of thugs all over the world hold elections. It means nothing. When a cabal has seized power you can have elections and even presidents, but you have freedom.
I realized early on with horror what I was seeing in Governor Palin: the continuation of the Rove-Cheney cabal, but this time without restraints. I heard her echo Bush 2000 soundbites (“the heart of America is on display”) and realized Bush’s speechwriters were writing her — not McCain’s — speeches. I heard her tell George Bush’s lies — not McCain’s — to the American people, linking 9/11 to Iraq. I heard her make fun of Barack Obama for wanting to prevent the torture of prisoners — this is Rove-Cheney’s enthusiastic S and M, not McCain’s, who, though he shamefully colluded in the 2006 Military Tribunals Act, is also a former prisoner of war and wrote an eloquent Newsweek piece in 2005 opposing torture. I saw that she was even styled by the same skillful stylist (neutral lipstick, matte makeup, dark colors) who turned Katharine Harris from a mall rat into a stateswoman and who styles all the women in the Bush orbit –but who does not bother to style Cindy McCain.
Not too long in the past, people would be put in a straight jacket and given a medical hold for going around the bend like this. Now, they get writing gigs at the Huffington Post.
BTW, I have been reading PJ’s breakdown of the business as usual insane post by Wolf, and caught something interesting in one of his highlights
Under the Palin-Rove police state, citizens will be targeted with state cyberterrorism. Bruce Fein of the American Freedom Agenda, a former Reagan official, warned me three years ago that the Bush team went after a Republican who had crossed them through cyberstalking: they messed with his email, messed with his phones and I believe messed with his bank account — he became a cyber-pariah, unemployable and haunted.
They “messed with his email?” You mean like how that Democrat hacker did with Sarah Palin’s e-mail? Okay, sorry for the interruption. We return you now to Naomi Wolf Fantasy Theater:
Heh.
Email This
Posted by William Teach on September 23, 2008 8:59 am
» Filed Under Democrats, Elections, Liberal Media/Bias, News, Obama/Biden, Propaganda, Psychology, Sarah Palin, Unhinged, War On Terror, military
Trackback URL:
Comments
13 Responses to “HuffPo: All Hail The New Fuhrer, Sarah Palin”
-
-
-
Affiliations
The Giants
Advertise
-
-
Our Store
- Click the design to visit our store and help Stop the ACLU!
-
- More blogs about the ACLU
Syndicate Me
Liberalism is a mental disorder, but which one. It seems to inculcate sociopathic behaviors, but with an odd blending of delusion, projection, and cognitive dissonance. If you asked the author of this piece what her best personality trait was, I would bet the farm she would say “tolerance”.
We are rapidly approaching the day when analysis becomes redundant and we will simply have to deal with the problem people en masse.
I don’t know how realistic Wolf’s predictions are. But it is telling just how much her detractors embrace the very tactics she fears.
Tha Machine has decided that “analysis is redundant” and that “we will simply have to deal with the problem people en masse.” I’m wondering who that “we” is. And what’s the definition for “problem people”?
HRPKathy meanwhile wants to treat those who think differently than her as “mentally sick”. She equates “liberalism” with “spociopathy”- and what does the far right suggest doing to those they brand “sociopaths”- put them in prison or kill them?
Meanwhile the original post-author presents his not-so-subtle prescription for those pesky journalists- ” be put in a straight jacket (sic) and given a medical hold for going around the bend like this”
Whether or not you support the McCain/Palin ticket- all readers should consider the quality of the people they are getting into bed with. If you aren’t willing to travel with them to every length of extremity, then you will be the next one targeted.
Paul Simon’s hit single “Kodachrome” begins “When I think back on all the CRAP I learned in high school, it’s a wonder I can think at all…” I am a San Francisco resident, and think for myself despite being a product of San Francisco’s public school system. Although we are not contemporaries, Naomi Wolf is — along with globalist SCOTUS Justice Stephen Breyer and Carol Channing — an alumnus of elite Lowell High School, which is S.F. high schools’ equivalent of an Ivy League college. As a proud graduate of another S.F. high school, it gives me a smile every time she goes off the rails into madness.
Come to think of it, “off the rails” is her natural habitat; only in rare occasions does she wander ON track.
On a serious note, I am truly frightened about the sharp reduction in our freedom of speech should Obama be elected. He is someone who is unwilling to admit being mistaken and has displayed an alarming willingness to encourage and do anything to intimidate and/or silence his detractors and critics.
When you combine his propensity to label any opponent as racist, unenlightened, and inhumane with the unihibited enthusiasm of his supporters to be aggressive and “get in the face” of those who don’t pledge allegience to Obama we are entering some dangerous territory. Obama’s demand that there be mandatory civil service and a domestic national security corps opens the door to a neighborhood watch infrastructure like that found in Cuba and other authoritarian states. The declaration of Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid that the “Fairness Doctrine” will be reimposed in the next session of Congress is another step in the progressive movement’s war on free speech.
We have a sitting US Senator who actively encourages his followers to silence the opposition. Teams of lawyers and activists have tried to use the Department of Justice, the IRS and the FEC to intimidate Republicans and even a group of religious groups protesting against Iran but who had retained their invitation to Sarah Palin to speak at their rally after Hillary Clinton withdrew. His campaign organization rallies supporters to shutdown talk radio shows that have the temerity to interview researchers and authors looking into Obama’s background.
Yet, the MSM is silent about this politically sanctioned attack on free speech because of their desire to see Republicans made a permanent minority party.
This is serious stuff – changes that will affect us all. Remember that when you step into the voting booth in November.
“A gang or cabal seizes power, usually with an affable, weak figurehead at the fore. Then they will hold elections — but they will make sure that the election will be corrupted and that the next affable, weak figurehead is entirely in their control.”
Transference? Sounds like she is talking about Obama.
merge divide wrote:
“Whether or not you support the McCain/Palin ticket- all readers should consider the quality of the people they are getting into bed with. If you aren’t willing to travel with them to every length of extremity, then you will be the next one targeted.”
Substituting “Obama/Biden” for “McCain/Palin” would yield a much more accurate statement.
Ditto the above: I thought it was my imagination, but Ms. Palin’s presence is shrinking from the Internet. Google features sparse but negative posts. Yahoo is more of the same. Here’s a woman, I’ve heard described as a combination of the girl next-door, Ms. Right, and “the one that got away,” who happens to have oil, in the run-up to a presidential election and, we’re seeing a handful of outdated rants. It’s been reported the Obama campaign is top-heavy with ex-Clinton staffers. Underestimate these Bolsheviks at your own peril; they spell trouble. Again, the best credential for governing is that the candidate embodies the will of the people. I think Sarah Palin does: http://theseedsof9-11.com
What kind of person is crazy enough to use a Yahoo account to conduct official government business?
And now we want to make her Vice President and give her top security clearance and access to all our nation’s secrets?
Doesn’t seem like such a good idea: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wPi17bX_4Ec
So, fjfjdvdv, explain what exactly is wrong with using a personal account? Is government sacred or something?
BTW, 1. the hacker found nothing wrong, and 2. do you approve of what the hacker did? If that was snail mail, the person would be looking at a minimum 5 years in federal jail. I haven’t seen many of you liberal “Bush is desecrating the Constitution” folks having an issue with this violation of privacy, not to mention the law.
As far as I know, most levels of government prohibit the use of official tools (like email) for unofficial or partisan purposes. That is, for example, why during the Clinton years Gore would leave the OEB to go to the DNC HQ to make fundraising phone calls.
The latest reports say none of the uncovered (purloined) email messages of Sarah Palin had any content relating to official government business.
Sounds as if she was following good government principals.
I’m a British Tory of the Margaret Thatcher tendency and looking at this stuff from the US is really really strange. The polarization between the parties is just so extreme it’s not normal at all. The two groups have retreated into mental bunkers and just cannot see anything outside their world views. In the UK things are much more fluid even in places which are typically extremist for one party or the other. People listen to arguments and can change their minds and they expect leaders to have a minimum standard of knowledge. Someone like Palin wouldn’t last 15 seconds in that environment.
To hear people defend Palin when she is so obviously not up to the job is bizarre. Put it like this, if you’re going to have a war with the rest of the world, you do at least want leaders who are as bright as the bad guys. Home spun philosophy, prayer, a fiesty temperament and good hair isn’t going to swing it with Putin. They must be laughing themselves silly.
That is an interesting point about Sarah, John. One that comes straight from the Democrat playbook.
What do you think of Obama and his qualifications?
You know something, Kathy, I’m a liberal who is pretty tired of being called an idiot or mentally ill. If you’ve got an argument, why don’t you back it up with facts instead of sweeping generalizations meant to insult people? This is a democracy, which means our future is tied to the best thoughts that we, as a nation together, can reach. Disrespecting, even hating, half of America is not a good path forward.