Comments on: Hats for Hypocrites

By: Phil

Phil — Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:14:33 +0000

So you think it comes down to intent?

By: Truth and Reason

Truth and Reason — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 23:44:30 +0000

Phil, yeah, the correct, most accurate translation is murder. Therefore, for the war argument to be valid, we would have to be aiming at the innocent by-standers like abortion does. Since, of course, we do not, it’s easy to see how we can be pro-life and pro-war.

By: OMG … Obama “Faith” based Merchandise … “Believers for Barack” … Just Words | Scared Monkeys

Tue, 16 Sep 2008 19:11:17 +0000

[...] you can mass produce all the religious campaign products you want, this little issue might be a greater obstacle than your marketing gimmick. To borrow the line from Stop the ACLU … [...]

By: Phil

Phil — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 12:14:39 +0000

Hello. short-time reader, first-time commenter and Democrat here. I like your site as a source for opinions I don’t usually get.

All snark and sarcasm aside, you say, “Ah, yes. The perfect compliment to your bible, which clearly says, Intentionally. Killing. Innocent. People. Is. Sin.”

Does it actually say that, (I’m no expert despite being a confirmed Catholic) or are you referring to the Ten Commandments Thou Shall Not Kill, or Murder in most modern translations?

I think we can admit that any and all war leads to the death, or killing, of innocent people, often called “Collateral Damage.”

If this is the case, and I’m not sure how you can say otherwise, my next question then would be, how can we support any candidate that supports war if we know that war will lead to the killing of innocent people and sin?

Thanks.

By: Fausta’s Blog » Blog Archive » Palin, tanned, relaxed and ready; Obama’s goods for the gullible

Tue, 16 Sep 2008 12:08:55 +0000

[...] at the”believers for Obama” merchandise, Stop the ACLU is not amused, and LaShawn Barber compares the candidates’ position from a Christian point of [...]

By: Angie

Angie — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 05:21:25 +0000

If the government were LESS involved in our lives and personal decisions, there wouldn’t be a need for rummies like Barry to make a big stink. Abolish ALL the laws, and consider the topic off limits in any way to anybody other the person making the decision and those DIRECTLY involved in its outcome. Not the fanatics. Not Joe sitting on the corner bus stop. Not the press. Not the courts. And certainly not Barry. We have too many laws, and they’re just a big nasty snarl now. Best way to cure a snarl?

Grab a pair of scissors and get to snippin.

By: MarkJ

MarkJ — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 04:11:00 +0000

“In conjunction with the rollout of his line of faith merchandise, Senator Obama announced that ‘God would call him home’ if he didn’t raise $100 million before the end of September.”

/snark