<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (Video) Excerpts from Sarah Palin Interview With ABC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/09/11/video-excerpts-from-sarah-palin-interview-with-abc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/09/11/video-excerpts-from-sarah-palin-interview-with-abc/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:25:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roger Kuhn</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/09/11/video-excerpts-from-sarah-palin-interview-with-abc/comment-page-1/#comment-97556</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Kuhn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 16:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=12241#comment-97556</guid>
		<description>Charlie Gibson.......How amuzing you were to Americans, while the Democrats applauded you.

Well it didn&#039;t work Charlie. Governor Palin has more respect now than ever... and more votes also.

The editing by you and your staff of Liberals only harmed you and your network. ABC will continue to loose those of us who thought ABC was a unbais network. After all we did see you elect Bill Clinton, but we did stop Gore and Mr. Swift Boater from forming us further into a Socialist French country.

Roger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie Gibson&#8230;&#8230;.How amuzing you were to Americans, while the Democrats applauded you.</p>
<p>Well it didn&#8217;t work Charlie. Governor Palin has more respect now than ever&#8230; and more votes also.</p>
<p>The editing by you and your staff of Liberals only harmed you and your network. ABC will continue to loose those of us who thought ABC was a unbais network. After all we did see you elect Bill Clinton, but we did stop Gore and Mr. Swift Boater from forming us further into a Socialist French country.</p>
<p>Roger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oakley</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/09/11/video-excerpts-from-sarah-palin-interview-with-abc/comment-page-1/#comment-97495</link>
		<dc:creator>Oakley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 01:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=12241#comment-97495</guid>
		<description>Someone else posted this list on another comment section.

This is a list of the questions asked Obama by Gibson compared to the questions asked Palin by Gibson.

Charlie Gibson interviewed Obama and Palin. Below are the questions. Who do you think is being vetted and who is the media hiding and treating with kid gloves?

Obama interview:
How does it feel to break a glass ceiling?
How does it feel to “win”?
How does your family feel about your “winning” breaking a glass ceiling?
Who will be your VP?
Should you choose Hillary Clinton as VP?
Will you accept public finance?
What issues is your campaign about?
Will you visit Iraq?
Will you debate McCain at a town hall?
What did you think of your competitor’s [Clinton] speech?

Palin interview:
Do you have enough qualifications for the job you’re seeking? Specifically have you visited foreign countries and met foreign leaders?
Aren’t you conceited to be seeking this high level job?
Questions about foreign policy
-territorial integrity of Georgia
-allowing Georgia and Ukraine to be members of NATO
-NATO treaty
-Iranian nuclear threat
-what to do if Israel attacks Iran
-Al Qaeda motivations
-the Bush Doctrine
-attacking terrorists harbored by Pakistan
Is America fighting a holy war? [misquoted Palin] 

Obviously, Gibson and his smug attitude were trying to trip Palin.  I&#039;d like to see his demeanor in the Obama interview and see if he was so smug and condiscending with Obama</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone else posted this list on another comment section.</p>
<p>This is a list of the questions asked Obama by Gibson compared to the questions asked Palin by Gibson.</p>
<p>Charlie Gibson interviewed Obama and Palin. Below are the questions. Who do you think is being vetted and who is the media hiding and treating with kid gloves?</p>
<p>Obama interview:<br />
How does it feel to break a glass ceiling?<br />
How does it feel to “win”?<br />
How does your family feel about your “winning” breaking a glass ceiling?<br />
Who will be your VP?<br />
Should you choose Hillary Clinton as VP?<br />
Will you accept public finance?<br />
What issues is your campaign about?<br />
Will you visit Iraq?<br />
Will you debate McCain at a town hall?<br />
What did you think of your competitor’s [Clinton] speech?</p>
<p>Palin interview:<br />
Do you have enough qualifications for the job you’re seeking? Specifically have you visited foreign countries and met foreign leaders?<br />
Aren’t you conceited to be seeking this high level job?<br />
Questions about foreign policy<br />
-territorial integrity of Georgia<br />
-allowing Georgia and Ukraine to be members of NATO<br />
-NATO treaty<br />
-Iranian nuclear threat<br />
-what to do if Israel attacks Iran<br />
-Al Qaeda motivations<br />
-the Bush Doctrine<br />
-attacking terrorists harbored by Pakistan<br />
Is America fighting a holy war? [misquoted Palin] </p>
<p>Obviously, Gibson and his smug attitude were trying to trip Palin.  I&#8217;d like to see his demeanor in the Obama interview and see if he was so smug and condiscending with Obama</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/09/11/video-excerpts-from-sarah-palin-interview-with-abc/comment-page-1/#comment-97468</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 17:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=12241#comment-97468</guid>
		<description>If McCain were younger, then we could easily dismiss her lack of understanding of the basic issues and her inability to handle just a reporter, but given McCain&#039;s age, this was a very irresponsible choice by him.

If she can&#039;t even handle Gibson, what will she do if, heaven forbid, she becomes president? Do we really think she is capable of handling the national political landscape and world affairs with competence AND nuance?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If McCain were younger, then we could easily dismiss her lack of understanding of the basic issues and her inability to handle just a reporter, but given McCain&#8217;s age, this was a very irresponsible choice by him.</p>
<p>If she can&#8217;t even handle Gibson, what will she do if, heaven forbid, she becomes president? Do we really think she is capable of handling the national political landscape and world affairs with competence AND nuance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/09/11/video-excerpts-from-sarah-palin-interview-with-abc/comment-page-1/#comment-97335</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 06:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=12241#comment-97335</guid>
		<description>I thought Governor Palin did reasonably well considering the tone of the questioner.  Gibson was condescending in manner, and most of his questions were designed to try to trip her up, including his follow-ups when he didn&#039;t get the answer he wanted.  To ask a Vice Presidential candidate whether we have the right to invade Pakistan (currently an ally in the War on Terror) if we know bin Laden is there, what kind of answer are you expecting?  She tried to answer diplomatically and he kept demanding a &quot;yes&quot; or &quot;no&quot;.  At one point he even said &quot;I got lost there in a blizzard of words.  Was that a &#039;yes&#039; or a &#039;no&#039;?&quot;  What a jerk.

He went on to misquote her comments about praying that our troops being sent into harm&#039;s way are doing God&#039;s will, so that it made her sound like a bible-thumping nut.  When she challenged the accuracy of his quotation, he stood firm, saying &quot;exact words.&quot;  He was WRONG.  He owes her an apology.  She went on to handle the question well, by the way.

She did almost as well as could be expected, given her limited experience in these areas (national policy and being hostilely interviewed by a national reporter from Washington D.C.), and I predict she&#039;ll get better as the campaign goes on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Governor Palin did reasonably well considering the tone of the questioner.  Gibson was condescending in manner, and most of his questions were designed to try to trip her up, including his follow-ups when he didn&#8217;t get the answer he wanted.  To ask a Vice Presidential candidate whether we have the right to invade Pakistan (currently an ally in the War on Terror) if we know bin Laden is there, what kind of answer are you expecting?  She tried to answer diplomatically and he kept demanding a &#8220;yes&#8221; or &#8220;no&#8221;.  At one point he even said &#8220;I got lost there in a blizzard of words.  Was that a &#8216;yes&#8217; or a &#8216;no&#8217;?&#8221;  What a jerk.</p>
<p>He went on to misquote her comments about praying that our troops being sent into harm&#8217;s way are doing God&#8217;s will, so that it made her sound like a bible-thumping nut.  When she challenged the accuracy of his quotation, he stood firm, saying &#8220;exact words.&#8221;  He was WRONG.  He owes her an apology.  She went on to handle the question well, by the way.</p>
<p>She did almost as well as could be expected, given her limited experience in these areas (national policy and being hostilely interviewed by a national reporter from Washington D.C.), and I predict she&#8217;ll get better as the campaign goes on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abc 123</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/09/11/video-excerpts-from-sarah-palin-interview-with-abc/comment-page-1/#comment-97297</link>
		<dc:creator>abc 123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 00:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=12241#comment-97297</guid>
		<description>&quot;Anyone who criticizes Governor Sarah Palin for asking Charlie Gibson to be more specific about the &quot;Bush Doctrine&quot; is trying to mislead you in at least two ways (http://hughhewitt.townhall.com/blog/g/7656b78a-a090-4a56-9bf5-0e37bdaff80a)

1.    They&#039;re pretending that the term &quot;Bush Doctrine&quot; has a single clear, unambiguous meaning that anyone who follows national affairs ought to have immediately recognized. It doesn&#039;t. 

2.    They&#039;re pretending that because Gov. Palin didn&#039;t immediately try to guess which of several plausible meanings Gibson meant to give that term, but instead asked for clarification, she therefore must have been unprepared to discuss any of them. Gov. Palin herself disproved that premise, because upon receiving the requested clarification, she immediately responded with clarity and self-assurance.

If they had bothered to look, even the Wikipedia could have cured Josh Marshall, Greg Sargent, or Andrew Sullivan of their illusion that there&#039;s a single, simple meaning to the term &quot;Bush Doctrine.&quot; When it comes to any discussion of Gov. Sarah Palin, these folks have shown us yet again that they just can&#039;t be trusted to get their basic facts right.&quot;

See some of the (many) various definitions of the “Bush Doctrine” (including the many variations used at Gibson&#039;s ABC)  at 

http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2008/09/what_exactly_is_the_bush_doctr.asp

Kudos to Governor Palin for recognizing Chuckie&#039;s MSM trap.

Now, can someone please explain why nearly every one of Governor Palin&#039;s answers appeared to be cut off or edited?????????????????????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Anyone who criticizes Governor Sarah Palin for asking Charlie Gibson to be more specific about the &#8220;Bush Doctrine&#8221; is trying to mislead you in at least two ways (<a href="http://hughhewitt.townhall.com/blog/g/7656b78a-a090-4a56-9bf5-0e37bdaff80a" rel="nofollow">http://hughhewitt.townhall.com/blog/g/7656b78a-a090-4a56-9bf5-0e37bdaff80a</a>)</p>
<p>1.    They&#8217;re pretending that the term &#8220;Bush Doctrine&#8221; has a single clear, unambiguous meaning that anyone who follows national affairs ought to have immediately recognized. It doesn&#8217;t. </p>
<p>2.    They&#8217;re pretending that because Gov. Palin didn&#8217;t immediately try to guess which of several plausible meanings Gibson meant to give that term, but instead asked for clarification, she therefore must have been unprepared to discuss any of them. Gov. Palin herself disproved that premise, because upon receiving the requested clarification, she immediately responded with clarity and self-assurance.</p>
<p>If they had bothered to look, even the Wikipedia could have cured Josh Marshall, Greg Sargent, or Andrew Sullivan of their illusion that there&#8217;s a single, simple meaning to the term &#8220;Bush Doctrine.&#8221; When it comes to any discussion of Gov. Sarah Palin, these folks have shown us yet again that they just can&#8217;t be trusted to get their basic facts right.&#8221;</p>
<p>See some of the (many) various definitions of the “Bush Doctrine” (including the many variations used at Gibson&#8217;s ABC)  at </p>
<p><a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2008/09/what_exactly_is_the_bush_doctr.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2008/09/what_exactly_is_the_bush_doctr.asp</a></p>
<p>Kudos to Governor Palin for recognizing Chuckie&#8217;s MSM trap.</p>
<p>Now, can someone please explain why nearly every one of Governor Palin&#8217;s answers appeared to be cut off or edited?????????????????????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Levi</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/09/11/video-excerpts-from-sarah-palin-interview-with-abc/comment-page-1/#comment-97287</link>
		<dc:creator>Levi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=12241#comment-97287</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know why you people are complaining. Gibson lobbed her softball after softball. He explained to her what a doctrine was. He didn&#039;t press her on anything and let her get away with saying some profoundly stupid stuff, i.e., &#039;You can see Russia from Alaska!&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know why you people are complaining. Gibson lobbed her softball after softball. He explained to her what a doctrine was. He didn&#8217;t press her on anything and let her get away with saying some profoundly stupid stuff, i.e., &#8216;You can see Russia from Alaska!&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrea</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/09/11/video-excerpts-from-sarah-palin-interview-with-abc/comment-page-1/#comment-97266</link>
		<dc:creator>andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 17:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=12241#comment-97266</guid>
		<description>Are you kidding. This woman could not answer the questions. It is no wonder they have been keeping her in a cone of silence. She worries me. We are interviewing this woman to be Vice President, or possibly President. She is not up to the task. As a country, we really deserve better representation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you kidding. This woman could not answer the questions. It is no wonder they have been keeping her in a cone of silence. She worries me. We are interviewing this woman to be Vice President, or possibly President. She is not up to the task. As a country, we really deserve better representation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JAR</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/09/11/video-excerpts-from-sarah-palin-interview-with-abc/comment-page-1/#comment-97265</link>
		<dc:creator>JAR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 17:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=12241#comment-97265</guid>
		<description>COME ON ABC!!  WHY HAVEN&#039;T YOU QUESTIONED OBAMA LIKE THIS.  HE IS THE ONE RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>COME ON ABC!!  WHY HAVEN&#8217;T YOU QUESTIONED OBAMA LIKE THIS.  HE IS THE ONE RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/09/11/video-excerpts-from-sarah-palin-interview-with-abc/comment-page-1/#comment-97263</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 17:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=12241#comment-97263</guid>
		<description>The Right Honorable Charles Gibson is gettin&#039; downright dishonorable lately. And mean spirited too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Right Honorable Charles Gibson is gettin&#8217; downright dishonorable lately. And mean spirited too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/09/11/video-excerpts-from-sarah-palin-interview-with-abc/comment-page-1/#comment-97259</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=12241#comment-97259</guid>
		<description>ABC and C. Gibson showed their true nature - a strong bias, lack of ability to report the news while attempting to make the news as seen through their eyes for their own benefit, very unprofessional.  But what can one expect from a lieral-loving group of wimps.   They deserve their fate - falling, weakenning ratings.  I once had a better impression of C. Gibson, and ABC --- but no longer.   They, both, are among the bigger problems in America and the world.  Will I watch them further - not very likely, junk is junk, trash is trash -  the old saying, &#039;garbage in, garbage out&#039; applies to them more everyday, with every news cast, almost every program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ABC and C. Gibson showed their true nature &#8211; a strong bias, lack of ability to report the news while attempting to make the news as seen through their eyes for their own benefit, very unprofessional.  But what can one expect from a lieral-loving group of wimps.   They deserve their fate &#8211; falling, weakenning ratings.  I once had a better impression of C. Gibson, and ABC &#8212; but no longer.   They, both, are among the bigger problems in America and the world.  Will I watch them further &#8211; not very likely, junk is junk, trash is trash &#8211;  the old saying, &#8216;garbage in, garbage out&#8217; applies to them more everyday, with every news cast, almost every program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
