<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama on Palin&#8217;s Family: Taking the Moral High Ground or Merely a Convenient Ploy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/09/02/obama-on-palins-family-taking-the-moral-high-ground-or-merely-a-convenient-ploy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/09/02/obama-on-palins-family-taking-the-moral-high-ground-or-merely-a-convenient-ploy/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:50:16 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roger W. Gardner</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/09/02/obama-on-palins-family-taking-the-moral-high-ground-or-merely-a-convenient-ploy/comment-page-1/#comment-95967</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger W. Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 06:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=11477#comment-95967</guid>
		<description>John -- Is that cryptic and inscrutable comment supposed to be profound?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John &#8212; Is that cryptic and inscrutable comment supposed to be profound?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger W. Gardner</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/09/02/obama-on-palins-family-taking-the-moral-high-ground-or-merely-a-convenient-ploy/comment-page-1/#comment-95965</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger W. Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 06:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=11477#comment-95965</guid>
		<description>Thanks Norman. You said it perfectly.
rg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Norman. You said it perfectly.<br />
rg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norm</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/09/02/obama-on-palins-family-taking-the-moral-high-ground-or-merely-a-convenient-ploy/comment-page-1/#comment-95938</link>
		<dc:creator>Norm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 03:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=11477#comment-95938</guid>
		<description>Re:&quot; Have your character assassins do the best and most efficient hatchet job they can possibly do, as quickly and expeditiously as they can do it; then after the deed is done denounce the denouncers&quot;

You&#039;re so right.  Obama says what he has to say even though his words are empty.  After studying his ilk (Obama, Clinton, et al), I&#039;ve found that he (they) do not have a conscience as it pertains to &#039;guilt&#039;.  They are never wrong...always right.  The never apologize for anything...just change the rhetoric and blame someone else. 
I once had a discussion about good vs evil. 
Among many of the items discussed was the question, &quot;Is it good to chop someone&#039;s head off?&quot;  Most everyone agreed that it was bad...except one respondent.  If you are an Islamic Fundamentalist, it is good to chop someone&#039;s head off.  So &#039;good&#039; all depends on what side the fence you’re on...
Never mind the fence, Obama is not even in the same ballpark; same goes for the Clintons and their ilk.
Obama should never be appeased or given any accolade for something you agree with for he himself, does not believe the words that appease you.  All straight out of Saul Alinsky’s text book</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re:&#8221; Have your character assassins do the best and most efficient hatchet job they can possibly do, as quickly and expeditiously as they can do it; then after the deed is done denounce the denouncers&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re so right.  Obama says what he has to say even though his words are empty.  After studying his ilk (Obama, Clinton, et al), I&#8217;ve found that he (they) do not have a conscience as it pertains to &#8216;guilt&#8217;.  They are never wrong&#8230;always right.  The never apologize for anything&#8230;just change the rhetoric and blame someone else.<br />
I once had a discussion about good vs evil.<br />
Among many of the items discussed was the question, &#8220;Is it good to chop someone&#8217;s head off?&#8221;  Most everyone agreed that it was bad&#8230;except one respondent.  If you are an Islamic Fundamentalist, it is good to chop someone&#8217;s head off.  So &#8216;good&#8217; all depends on what side the fence you’re on&#8230;<br />
Never mind the fence, Obama is not even in the same ballpark; same goes for the Clintons and their ilk.<br />
Obama should never be appeased or given any accolade for something you agree with for he himself, does not believe the words that appease you.  All straight out of Saul Alinsky’s text book</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norm</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/09/02/obama-on-palins-family-taking-the-moral-high-ground-or-merely-a-convenient-ploy/comment-page-1/#comment-95931</link>
		<dc:creator>Norm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 02:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=11477#comment-95931</guid>
		<description>Re:&quot; Have your character assassins do the best and most efficient hatchet job they can possibly do, as quickly and expeditiously as they can do it; then after the deed is done denounce the denouncers&quot;

You&#039;re so right.  Obama says what he has to say even though his words are empty.  After study his ilk (Obama, Clinton, et al), I&#039;ve found that he (they) do not have a conscience as it pertains to &#039;guilt&#039;.  They are never wrong...always right.  The never apologize for anything...just change the rhetoric and blame someone else. 
I once had a discussion about good vs evil. 
Among many of the items discussed was the question, &quot;Is it good to chop someone&#039;s head off?&quot;  Most everyone agreed that it was bad...except one respondent.  If you are an Islamic Fundamentalist, it is good to chop someone&#039;s head off.  So &#039;good&#039; all depends on what side the fence your on...Obama is not on America&#039;s side.  And the same for Clinton and their ilk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re:&#8221; Have your character assassins do the best and most efficient hatchet job they can possibly do, as quickly and expeditiously as they can do it; then after the deed is done denounce the denouncers&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re so right.  Obama says what he has to say even though his words are empty.  After study his ilk (Obama, Clinton, et al), I&#8217;ve found that he (they) do not have a conscience as it pertains to &#8216;guilt&#8217;.  They are never wrong&#8230;always right.  The never apologize for anything&#8230;just change the rhetoric and blame someone else.<br />
I once had a discussion about good vs evil.<br />
Among many of the items discussed was the question, &#8220;Is it good to chop someone&#8217;s head off?&#8221;  Most everyone agreed that it was bad&#8230;except one respondent.  If you are an Islamic Fundamentalist, it is good to chop someone&#8217;s head off.  So &#8216;good&#8217; all depends on what side the fence your on&#8230;Obama is not on America&#8217;s side.  And the same for Clinton and their ilk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
