Obama on Palin’s Family: Taking the Moral High Ground or Merely a Convenient Ploy?
Posted on September 2, 2008
From CNN.com
Obama Says Palin’s Family Off Limits
MONROE, Michigan (CNN) — Sen. Barack Obama said firmly that families are off-limits in the campaign for president, reacting to news that GOP running mate Sarah Palin’s 17-year-old daughter is pregnant.
“Let me be as clear as possible,” Obama said. “I think people’s families are off-limits, and people’s children are especially off-limits. This shouldn’t be part of our politics. It has no relevance to Gov. Palin’s performance as governor or her potential performance as a vice president.”
———————————————————————–
A note from Radarsite: After all that I have written about the very real dangers of an Obama Presidency, whenever I hear the leftist media — and even some delusional conservatives shmoozing about how Obama has taken the moral high ground on an issue, my antennae start tingling. The latest example of OB’s claim to moral heights is his kind and generous admonishment to his followers not to attempt to draw Republican VP candidate Sarah Palin’s family into the fray. This high-toned rhetoric would have carried much more weight if his army of sycophantic minions in the leftist media had not already jumped all over these personal family issues in what they themselves later characterized as an orgiastic “feeding-frenzy”. A media frenzy so blatant and tasteless, so vile and contemptuous, that even some well-known liberal talking heads appear to be genuinely shocked.
So then this is what we have — a perfect example of how you can have your cake and eat it too. Have your character assassins do the best and most efficient hatchet job they can possibly do, as quickly and expeditiously as they can do it; then after the deed is done denounce the denouncers. After all the bloody knives have been put back in their sheaves, you can step back and look aghast at the carnage.
And there is another game afoot. If we are to make all candidate’s family members taboo for investigative journalists’ probings, doesn’t that also have the added benefit of removing OB’s embarrassingly anti-American rhetoric-spilling wife from the field of battle?
Barack Hussein Obama as president would be absolutely disastrous for this vulnerable nation of ours. To lend him or his campaign any moral weight, based on their cynical manipulation of their sympathetic media is delusional and foolhardy. The only way Barack Obama can take the high moral ground in this race is to withdraw himself from it, and not to unleash the chaos on this country that his presidency most certainly would.
» Filed Under Child Exploitation, Elections, Liberal Media/Bias, News, Obama/Biden, Sarah Palin
Trackback URL
Comments
4 Responses to “Obama on Palin’s Family: Taking the Moral High Ground or Merely a Convenient Ploy?”
Leave a Reply
Re:” Have your character assassins do the best and most efficient hatchet job they can possibly do, as quickly and expeditiously as they can do it; then after the deed is done denounce the denouncers”
You’re so right. Obama says what he has to say even though his words are empty. After study his ilk (Obama, Clinton, et al), I’ve found that he (they) do not have a conscience as it pertains to ‘guilt’. They are never wrong…always right. The never apologize for anything…just change the rhetoric and blame someone else.
I once had a discussion about good vs evil.
Among many of the items discussed was the question, “Is it good to chop someone’s head off?” Most everyone agreed that it was bad…except one respondent. If you are an Islamic Fundamentalist, it is good to chop someone’s head off. So ‘good’ all depends on what side the fence your on…Obama is not on America’s side. And the same for Clinton and their ilk.
Re:” Have your character assassins do the best and most efficient hatchet job they can possibly do, as quickly and expeditiously as they can do it; then after the deed is done denounce the denouncers”
You’re so right. Obama says what he has to say even though his words are empty. After studying his ilk (Obama, Clinton, et al), I’ve found that he (they) do not have a conscience as it pertains to ‘guilt’. They are never wrong…always right. The never apologize for anything…just change the rhetoric and blame someone else.
I once had a discussion about good vs evil.
Among many of the items discussed was the question, “Is it good to chop someone’s head off?” Most everyone agreed that it was bad…except one respondent. If you are an Islamic Fundamentalist, it is good to chop someone’s head off. So ‘good’ all depends on what side the fence you’re on…
Never mind the fence, Obama is not even in the same ballpark; same goes for the Clintons and their ilk.
Obama should never be appeased or given any accolade for something you agree with for he himself, does not believe the words that appease you. All straight out of Saul Alinsky’s text book
Thanks Norman. You said it perfectly.
rg
John — Is that cryptic and inscrutable comment supposed to be profound?